Ups & Downs of Macron Foreign Policy on Iran

2022/01/18 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Foreign policy of France, as the seventh economy of the world have been overshadowed by many variables during the past four years such as taking office by Trump, outbreak of corona crisis, yellow vests crisis, Brexit, and quick developments taken place in the Middle East region. Such variables have undoubtedly overshadowed the relations and cooperation between the two countries of Iran and France during the period. Hadi Khazaei, Expert of European Affairs

Coincidence of the large part of Macron’s presidency (May 14, 2017 until January 2020) in France with those years of Trump tenure of office in the USA, in view of his political and economic attitude based on unilateralism and merely securing economic interests of the U.S. that sometimes incurred abundant economic costs upon some European countries such as France too, left effects on Macron’s attitude on Iran’s developments.

Amid all this, external factors such as the beginning of divergence among EU members, boosting of power and role of regional players, increasing of public opinion role as a pressure center, unwillingness of major powers to involve themselves directly in clashes, employing the sanction leverage against corporations, the willingness of newly emerged economic powers like China and India to play a more active role in political international developments along with loosening obedience of countries to the decisions made by international organizations and unions (weakening of multilateralism) have left a lot of effects on France’s attitude in her foreign policy during the past four years which we are going to review in three different junctions as follows:

1-Revival of Relations from 2017 to 2018

Since Macron was elected as the French President in 2017 until the U.S.  withdrawal from JCPOA (first stage) which took a year and is called the revival period of relations, the foreign policy of the two countries was mainly focused on economic rather than political pivots.

However, French President never denied his concerns about Iran’s missile program and its role in the region’s developments particularly in Syria and Lebanon in his remarks but in view of removal of sanctions within the framework of JCPOA agreement, French large corporations were making effort to preserve and expand their presence in Iranian market quickly and in competitions with other European rivals. Very important contracts were signed among major French companies (like TOTAL, Peugeot and Renault, Airbus and Sanofi) with Iranian companies, valued more than $ 16 billion in such a way that the volume of economic relations between the two countries rose to nearly 4 billion euros by the end of 2017.

2-Sharp Reduction of Relations & Gradual Increase of Threats (2018 – 2020)      

Within this period which coincided with the longest term of Macron’s tenure of office as French President, like other European partners the foreign policy of France tangibly changed coincided as Trump threats rose.

Despite supporting and standing by JCPOA, the country practically took the lead in strengthening the policy of tying developments of the region and Iran’s missile program to JCPOA and after the quick exit of French companies from Iranian market, it opened a new window of pressure coupled with threat to resort to snap back mechanism.

Reaction of French statesmen particularly Le Drian, Foreign Minister of the country at this junction and against the Iranian authorities who urged France to undertake its JCPOA commitments, was to adopt time buying policy aiming at prevention of any damage to strategic relations of France with the Zionist regime and the U.S. and gaining economic benefits from the expansion of its economic cooperation with the Persian Gulf countries and selling arms to them.

On the other side, Paris made effort to boost threats such as using snap back mechanism (automatic return of sanctions) and threat to act collectively within the EU against Iran and thus to pave the ground to play a probable intermediate role in holding negotiation between the U.S. and Iran.

Adoption of the policy of exerting pressure against Iran coincided with mere reliance on political support to JCPOA by France, despite Trump’s inattention to the red lines of Europe such as the principle of multilateralism caused the credibility of France, as an independent and influential power to international developments to be questioned. Particularly, the country had not already passed successfully tests like Brexit talks as well as Libya, Syria and Lebanon crises. During the period, the level of economic interactions with France was down to 300 million euro, the lowest level within the recent years.

3-Conditioning of the Revival of Relations to Success in Vienna Talks (2021)          

Resistance of and positions taken by our country based on disallowing French authorities to instrumentally use Iran along with taking office by Biden as the new U.S. President caused France to pay more attention to the issue of resumption of Vienna talks aiming at the return of the U.S. and Iran back to negotiating table rather than the issue of Iran missile program and its role in the developments of the region during 2021.

However, the approach did not mean Macron’s ignorance to deal with Iran’s missile program and criticizing its role in the developments of the region but it was the result of France’s certainty of non-success of the previous approach and playing the intermediate role between Iran and the U.S. as well as the result of presidential election in Iran.

To this end, (making effort for returning the U.S. to JCPOA and resumption of talks) France kept on the pressure against Iran within the framework of various statements of EU3 and stressed on the necessity of the partnership of the Persian Gulf countries in the talks. Yet, it had to admit the reality that guaranteeing the security and stability of the region is impossible without Iran’s cooperation.

To conclude the review, increasing dependence and economic inter-relationship between France and the U.S. along with other variables involved in the foreign policy that mentioned above within the past four years, was an important impediment for France to play a relative role to sort out crises and expand her relations with Iran which should be taken into attention in preparation of the road map to adjust and expand the relations in future.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading