Overview of Paris Intl. Conference & Perspective of Withdrawal of Russian and Turkish Forces from Libya

2021/12/02 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online-Interview: Having commented on the role and importance of interferences of foreign players in Libya and challenges ahead of the elections in the country, an analyst of international affairs said:” as long as foreign forces will not withdraw from Libya there is no guarantee to hold healthy elections and it is unclear that when the result of the elections opposes the interests of military groups, how would they react?

Having pointed out the holding of Paris International Conference on Libya, emphasis on holding the elections and also withdrawal of Russian and Turkish forces from the country, Sabri Anooshe in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations reminded that:” the Conference was held by the President of the French Republic in a situation that the country is on the brink of an election and Mr. Macron attempts to solidify  French interests in Libya and thus increase his chance of success in the upcoming election.

Interferences of Foreign Players in Libya  

Having reminded that in the European Union there is a competition between France and Italy to have influence, authority and share in Libya, he added:” Libya used to be a colony of Italy. The country still has interests in gas and oil fields of Libya. Italy had good relations with Ghaddafi and was criticizing NATO for unseating him. As Libyan oil is light and thus valuable for Europe and even the U.S. and her gas is also needed by Europe, the countries will not quit interfering in Libya.

Having said that due to disputes with Morocco, the export of Algeria’s gas to Spain has become time taking, the analyst of international affairs said” If the foreign players come to realize that peace should be established in Libya, this will happen. As every single group of internal players is supported by a number of regional players and international powers, therefore the internal players alone can not reach such an agreement.

Anooshe explained the aspects of Libyan importance for the U.S. and Europe, particularly in security, economic, immigration and organized crimes.  He stated that Italy, France and Germany play a role in Libya, but he attached the main role for the UK and the U.S. Anooshe continued:” Libyan hard currency reserves have been blocked in British and Maltese banks. According to some reports, as much as $ 100 billion of Libyan hard currency reserves are frozen in the banks of the two countries, without even a single dollar of interests given to Libya! The U.S. also hopes to exploit Libyan gas and coasts, thus attempts to assume the first role in the country. Anyway, Libya has strategic and geo-strategic sensitive status.

Having said the Libya’s neighbors, particularly Algeria and Tunisia support peace and stability in the country, the former Iranian diplomat added:” due to eleven years of war in Libya, the two countries have lost in economic and security fields. UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt support Haftar, but Qatar and Turkey axis are supporters of Tripoli.

Various Ambiguities over Holding Next Month Elections

He pointed out the emphasis of Paris International Conference on the necessity of holding the elections during December 2021 and added:” There are various ambiguities about holding the elections. It seems that internal groups in Libya are determined to hold it but there is no consensus among foreign players. There are 11 candidates for presidency at the moment, among them which one could be useful to serve more for the interests of France, Italy, the U.S., Turkey, Saudi Arabia and even Egypt?

Concerning the emphasis of the International Conference on the withdrawal of foreign forces particularly Turkish and Russian ones from the country, Anooshe said:” France plays some roles in this connection, the country indeed, supports Haftar and Eastern Libya Fraction”.

Having pointed out the Russia’s support to the results of Paris International Conference and also the ambiguous and critical position of Turkey on the withdrawal of her forces from Libya, the international analyst continued:” Turkish presence in Libya has hegemonic and prestigious, economic, security and strategic aspects for them. Ankara is looking for the revival of her historic clout in the North of Africa. Moreover, Turkey has some competitors for gas and oil of East Mediterranean and is alone among them. The only country that signed contract with Turkey is Tripoli government, as the supporter of Turkish interests in East Mediterranean.

East Mediterranean, Focal Point of Crisis in Future

Having said that it seems the East Mediterranean will become the focal point of crisis in future, he added:” Greece, Cyprus, the Zionist regime and Egypt have the same mind against Turkey, and Turkey is looking for an alliance no matter how weak it is. Now, Turkey sells drone to Tripoli which proved to be very decisive in war against Haftar. Moreover, Turkey charges Tripoli for stationing her forces there, which has benefits for military and economic costs of Turkey.

Russia & Turkey Positions on Their Exit from Libya           

In connection with Russia’s role in Libya, Anooshe said:” the country has strategic and geopolitical benefits for Russia. Putin invested on Haftar and makes effort to revive his position because of Haftar’s presence and to establish a military base in Libya. Now, Russia is also observing the issue of withdrawal of Turkish forces from Libya and can not withdraw his forces from the country without receiving reassurances on Turkish exit. All such issues will leave effect on the trend of elections in Libya”.

Having said that all parties involved have stressed that non-presence of foreign forces will guarantee healthy elections, he emphasized:” it must be asked that at present condition, who can guarantee healthy elections in Libya”.

The former Iranian diplomat to Tripoli pointed out to different scenarios raised on holding elections in due time in Libya and the importance of providing security to this field and added:” Some believe that Haftar may disorder the present situation with military measures. According to the reports of Libyan media, Haftar has accepted the withdrawal of 400 personnel of foreign forces from the country; but according to available data and information Russia has more than 2000 military forces in Libya. Moreover, the role of Chad forces and Darfur Sudanese forces should also be considered.

Anooshe stated:” as long as these forces do not withdraw from Libya, guaranteeing healthy elections is meaningless and it is not clear if the result of the elections opposes the interests of the military groups and also Haftar, how would they react”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading