Strategic Objectives of Saudi Arabia for Fanning Tension in Lebanon

2021/11/13 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: Any effort aimed at economic collapse of the coalition government is at first stage a kind of investment made by Saudi Arabia for the next Lebanese election in March 2022. Hossein Sayahi, Researcher, International Affairs

George Kordahi, the person supported by Hezbollah who now assumes the post of the minister of information of Lebanon, took position towards the Yemeni war in a TV program and declared that the attack of Saudi Arabia to Yemen is a clear example of assault and Yemenis are also defending their own country.

Following this position, Saudi Arabia declared last week that she was going to stop imports from Lebanon and sent a message to the Lebanese ambassador to leave Saudi Arabia within 48 hours. The decision was followed and repeated by Bahrain, UAE and Kuwait.

This was the latest measure taken by Saudi Arabia in connection with Lebanon that many analysts have interpreted it not merely as a reaction to the viewpoints of the Lebanese minister but as a measure planned to change the regional balance particularly in competition with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

This is the case while the measure can intensify the spiraling economic crisis in Lebanon because Saudi Arabia and her allegiant regional countries are considered to be big markets for Lebanese made commodities, as the volume of imports to three countries of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE amounted to nearly $ 750 million in 2020.

Moreover, severance of relations with Lebanon may create increasing problems for 350000 Lebanese working in these countries.

Despite the efforts made by the Prime Minister and President of Lebanon to reduce tensions with Saudi Arabia and convincing the country to change her mind in connection with the severance of relations with Lebanon, Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia has announced that the issue was far beyond the expression of an idea by a minister and the decision by Saudi Arabia was not made to react to the issue, but based on the situation that Lebanon was placed in.

He underscored that interaction between the two countries is neither constructive nor useful as long as the Lebanese government finds a solution to disentangle it from the present political structure of the country in which Hezbollah plays an instrumental role. In views of such expression of view, now one may ask the question what are the factors to cause Saudi Arabia make such a decision?

Hezbollah Upper-hand

As countries like Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon are said to be the regional field of competition between Saudi Arabia and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in view of Iran’s support to Hezbollah and strengthening of political positions of Hezbollah within the recent years, Saudi Arabia has decided to practice a kind of balance change in this field. Now, Riyadh hopes to make a change through which the situation will lead to reverse to her interests at least in Lebanon.

Lebanon is a field competition in which Saudi household is not willing to have a little chance, like Yemen, for success. As mentioned earlier, the main problem of Saudi Arabia in Lebanon is Hezbollah supremacy over political foundations as well as its noticeable popular base in the country, an organization that is seen by Saudis as allegiant and valuable regional partner of Iran as their most traditional and the largest competitor.

In this connection, Joseph Bahout an expert on the Middle East at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace believes that Saudis know well that in relation to Lebanon they do not want just one thing; i.e. Iran’s influence in the country but they do not know what they have to do against such influence.

Despite the Sunni Muslims are the majority of population in Lebanon but after the assassination of Rafiq Hariri as her powerful ally in 2005, Saudi Arabia has not managed to create a noticeable influence through an integrated proxy ally in Lebanon so far, the influence that according to evidences, Iran has achieved by Hezbollah.

Thus, vis-à-vis Iran’s influence in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia has always adopted a policy to approach the central government and make effort to weaken Hezbollah’s positions in Lebanese political foundations. Now, in view of the recent failures, it seems that Saudi Arabia does not consider the continuation of such policy useful and has tried to weaken and or collapse the government of Lebanon which is seen by the country as strongly influenced by Hezbollah, the decision that pursues certain objectives and results.

From this point of view, any effort aimed at economic collapse of the coalition government is at first stage a kind of investment made by Saudi Arabia for the next Lebanese election in March 2022. Since Western countries have also expressed their explicit support to the next election to be held in due time, Riyadh believes that weakening of living sustenance and also economic collapse as well as political struggles in Lebanon may lead to  weakened position of Hezbollah and her allies among voters who enjoy to have the majority in Lebanon.

On the other side, Saudi measure to isolate Lebanon under relative dominance of Hezbollah may lead to a kind of agreement between Saudis and the Zionist regime on their common objectives; the two sides have common views on breaking Iran’s influence in Lebanon and also weakening Hezbollah’s circumstance, the situation that seems to be attractive but challenging for Saudi Arabia.

Approaching the Zionist regime, especially in regional security arrangements will cost a lot for Saudi Arabia, the costs that Saudi Arabia is not willing to pay because of her economic plans in 2030 perspective. Moreover, this will be unacceptable for the public opinions of Muslim societies.

Having remembered the unsuccessful experience to siege Qatar and also pressing Sa’ad Hariri to resign after his failure to confront Hezbollah in 2017, it seems that Saudi Arabia is unable to demonstrate a noticeable achievement in connection with Lebanon this time to change the regional balance in competition with Iran. However, the efforts made by Saudi Arabia to flex her muscle in Lebanon should not be taken easily.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر