Monopolist Configuration of Taliban Interim Cabinet & Its Consequences

2021/09/14 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An analyst of Afghanistan affairs having said that the victor of the Taliban’s list is the Haqqani faction and Pakistan, and Molla Baradar faction has been marginalized, said:” Afghanistan society is now experiencing a profound gap between the government and other ethnics and religious sects. The situation is very dangerous and may lead to an internal war.

Pirmohammad Molla Zehi in an interview with the site of Strategic Council for Foreign Relations having said that the decision to launch a military attack on Panjshir and settling the intra-Taliban disputes are basically among those issues that were reviewed in the course of the visit of the head of ISI of Pakistan to Kabul. He stated that:” Apparently, with Pakistan’s management, Taliban decided not to declare the Islamic Emirates of Afghanistan for the time being and to form a caretaker cabinet containing Quetta Council and Haqqani Network. They also appointed acting ministers for ministries, but the combination was not the same as the Taliban had promised and observers expected for.

The analyst of Afghanistan affairs continued:” It was conceived that Taliban would not head towards the monopoly of power while the monopoly of power is functionalized both ethnically and ideologically at the present time. Everybody is from Pashtun ethnic group, they have not let other ethnicities take a share in power, and by ideological monopoly, they have not let any other political and religious group participate in the government.

MollaZehi told:” Obviously, other excluded ethnics may approach the resistance front and strengthen Panjshir. We witness the positions taken by Afghanistan political groups that represent they have not accepted the structure (of power) and they may join the resistance. Time requires as to when and how the resistance shows itself, but it is true that Afghanistan society is now experiencing a profound gap between the government and other ethnicities and religious sects. The situation is very dangerous and may lead to an internal war.

Victor of Taliban’s List; Haqqani Faction & Pakistan                  

Having said that the victor of Taliban’s list is Haqqani faction and Pakistan, and Molla Baradar faction has been marginalized, said:” Quetta Council or Peshawar Council have differences of opinions with Haqqani Network on behavior and the type of government they want to form, but at a present junction, Haqqani Network has the military power. Kabul was seized by them, but the Quetta Council has no other elements except conventional forces at the leadership level. The dealing made by Pakistan is also in favor of the Haqqani Network; because the military power is at their disposal.

According to the expert on Afghanistan, It seems that there is a compromise between the two sides in which the Quetta Council had admitted to its weak position. The dealing might have been made on the leadership post.

MollaZehi explained:” There might have been a compromise that cabinet members are mostly from Haqqani Network and military issues will be taken care of by them to organize in future, provided that there will be no critique against Molla Akhund leadership from their side. However, this is a separate issue how this agreement is going to be functionalized; but at the moment, Haqqani Network has appointed the leader, and if they achieve this post too, Quetta Council will be practically neutralized with a cosmetic presence. They will not be able to take any action, and Pakistan will overwhelmingly overrule Afghanistan.

Military Restrictions of Quetta Council against Haqqani Network        

Having referred to some analyses on the possibility of separation of Quetta Council from Haqqani Network, the outbreak of clashes and internal disputes among Taliban, he said:” Quetta Council has no military potential to stand against Haqqani network. Therefore, it may play an antagonist role and remain in the government, but they can’t take arms. It shouldn’t be forgotten that an important part of Taliban forces have gone towards Haqqani Network. Their important field commanders did not accept the compromised agreement signed between the Taliban and the U.S. in Doha. That’s why they either left the country or joined ISIS. Now, a part of ISIS is the very same Taliban forces who were dissatisfied with the Doha talks.

Having stated that Quetta Council has an upper political hand, MollaZehi added:” Haqqani Network is in the U.S. terrorist list, and they had offered a $ 5 million reward for the head of Mr. Sirajuddin Haqqni who is now appointed as the acting minister of interior, and after nominating Taliban cabinet ministers, they have increased the reward to $ 10 million. If the Taliban wants to be recognized by the West, they will have no options but to accept Quetta Council to some extent.

Having referred to the effects of the presence of Quetta Council members in Guantanamo prison who know the U.S. better, he spelled out:” Quetta Council will not take any risk for a military clash. Moreover, there is no internal stable condition, therefore, they try their best to sort out the disputes among themselves and Pakistan will (mediate to) make a compromise.

Having stated that people, as well as political and ethnical groups of Afghanistan, have not accepted the cabinet introduced by the Taliban, stressed that:” For sure, resistance against the monopoly will be definite. It can’t be said that at least 50% of the non-Pashtun population will surrender. Today situation in Afghanistan is different from the situation in the past. Other ethnicities are now familiar with arms too. They can fight, organize, and demonstrate. But the problem goes beyond Afghanistan. We should also take into account the presence and the role played by major and regional powers in this country. For example, China and Russia may secure their interests with Taliban presence, replace the West, and sort out the financial difficulties of Afghanistan.

In the meantime, he added that:” if the gap between Taliban government and other popular and civil groups leads to internal war, the regional countries will have to support one of the parties. In that case, the internal war will turn to a proxy war. In such a condition, there might be chaos and ISIS will take action with its ambition.

Having stated that Taliban has no concern about the popular protests, he called the appointment message of Sirajuddin Haqqani as the acting minister of interior was to create a security and repressive atmosphere and said:” They are in a full authority position and made their agreements with the U.S. and try to suppress any disturbance on their way”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading