Factors Effective in Rapid Advancement of Taliban in Afghanistan

2021/07/04 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on Afghanistan affairs regarding the recent developments in Afghanistan and the rise of the Taliban said: In recent days, the Taliban have succeeded in gaining control over almost large parts of Afghanistan. This dominance is important when we look at the partition of Afghanistan before the Taliban took control; in that division, one part of about 8 to 10 percent was under the control of the Taliban, one part of 20 to 30 percent was under the control of the government and the rest were almost gray areas that were not under the effective control of any of those forces.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Nozar Shafiei emphasized: Currently, the Taliban have succeeded in making significant progress in the gray areas; therefore, as time goes on, unlike in the past, when the Taliban wanted to dominate the time instead of the land, now they want to dominate both land and time; that means they want the areas under their control still remain under their control.

The university professor, in response to what factors led to such progress explained: Undoubtedly, the first factor is the withdrawal of the United States and NATO from Afghanistan. It was quite predictable that the Taliban would be able to make such progress as soon as the US and NATO withdraw from Afghanistan.

He attributed the second factor to the weakness of the Afghan army, adding: The Afghan army has suffered not because of the number of personnel, training and weapons, but because of the asymmetry of the war; this means that the Afghan army is trained for a regular and classic war, but the operations carried out by the Taliban are largely irregular, which makes it difficult for the army to deal with the Taliban.

According to the expert, the third factor is the weakness of the government; because the government of Afghanistan is a contract government, that is, the result of a contract between different forces. Those different forces are constantly fighting for more power; therefore, this damage within the government has paved the way for the Taliban to show its strength.

Shafiei described the fourth factor as the psychological dimension of the case and noted: Before 2001, when the Taliban were conducting operations, those operations were mainly suicidal, that is to say they would attack directly on the front lines of the enemy, and although they might have suffered casualties, they would however break the enemy’s front line. The fears that existed after 2001 are still present in the Afghan people, government, military and paramilitary groups, so part of the Taliban’s rapid advance is due to the immediate surrender and evacuation of the scene by government-affiliated forces.

The expert on Afghanistan affairs considered the green light and the support given to the Taliban by some countries in the region, specifically China and Pakistan, as the fifth factor, explaining: In other words, Pakistan definitely supports the Taliban and China does not take a stand against the Taliban. This is because China is influencing the Taliban through Pakistan.

He also cited the Taliban-affiliated social body as important, citing it as the sixth factor. The Taliban are part of the Pashtun ethnic group and the Pashtun community is one of the most traditional tribes in Afghanistan and even in the world. Therefore, the Taliban ideology has a lot of buyers among that ethnic group.

Describing the seventh factor involved in the Taliban’s rise, the expert described poverty in Afghanistan, adding: There is now a large segment of Afghan society, especially the unemployed youth, who are actually using the war as a job opportunity. Therefore, any group that pays more money, a part of those young people will join that group. The Taliban are able to recruit those forces through the drug trade and financial support from some countries.

According to Shafiei, the inefficiency of and corruption in the government is also one of the concerns and worries among the people of Afghanistan and therefore has deprived the government of social asset; therefore, the people do not welcome the government and do not resist the Taliban’s progress.

Shafiei believes that in spite of all such issues, the scene of Afghanistan is the scene of the possibilities and anything is likely to happen in that country.

Regarding the consequences of insecurity in Afghanistan and the possibility of its spread to neighboring countries, the expert said: Currently, the behavior of the Taliban and the developments that will take place after the possible takeover of the Taliban in Afghanistan are quite clear for some countries, and vague for others. For example, for a country like Pakistan, everything is clear and the success of the Taliban is considered the success of Pakistan. There is also the possibility of reconciliation with the Taliban for China, due to the deep ties between Islamabad and Beijing.

Regarding the Taliban’s relations with Iran, Russia, India, the United States and Central Asian countries, he explained that there are serious ambiguities in those relations, noting: If the Taliban take power, the interests of those countries will be seriously ambiguous. Because, some countries may now think that developments in Afghanistan are under control, but the reality is that when a political and military force goes through an acute phase and consolidates its power, its pattern of behavior may change.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر