Importance of and Reason for Iran’s Interaction with Taliban

2021/02/19 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Although for a long time, governments were the most important and only players in international politics and power was the first and most important determinant of international equations, in recent decades and with the emergence of non-governmental players, we have been witness to their role-playing. Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on International Affairs

With the emergence of new and non-governmental players in the arena of the international system, relations have also changed and new forms of relations have taken shape. Domestic and transnational players, who are devoid of a governmental format, enter the field of politics and use the paths and methods that are recognized in foreign policy to influence international relations.

From this perspective, the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran also has a variety of real and legal players on the other side of the borders that formally and informally influence the decision-making process and behaviour of foreign policy in various ways.

Regarding the recent negotiations between Iran and the Taliban, it is necessary to pay attention to the following points:

First point: For the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Taliban is part of the current and future reality of Afghanistan and the region that cannot be ignored. The Taliban is a group that 1- has an extraterritorial nature and transnational connections, the scope of whose activities has spread to more than one country; 2- has an impact on other international players. In other words, the Taliban has entered into the diplomatic arena in recent years. If, from a specific perspective, diplomacy is divided into the four categories: denial diplomacy, marginal diplomacy, parallel diplomacy, and unintentional diplomacy, the Taliban, with the exception of denial diplomacy, which is highly destabilizing and causes severe ambiguity and separation among governmental and non-governmental political players, has actively entered into three dimensions of diplomacy. The inevitable result of the Taliban entering into the diplomatic arena could be a “divergence from violent and terrorist activities.”

Second point: The interaction and talks of the Islamic Republic of Iran are with that part of the Taliban that is no longer considered as a terrorist. At the time of Burhanuddin Rabbani (the tenth president of Afghanistan), when the Taliban emerged, it was a violent and terrorist group that, with US support, sought to seize absolute power in Afghanistan and on behalf of the United States pursue its goals. Therefore, it was a serious threat to Iran, Russia and China. After the Taliban failed to achieve its goals with the bravery of Afghan Mujahideen, especially the martyr Ahmad Shah Massoud, it gradually marginalized and eventually changed its approach as such that in recent years, it has constantly tried to play a role as a “political current” and a group inside Afghanistan in the political future of the country. The face of the Taliban is now more of a “political figure” with whom foreign countries, typically in coordination with the Afghan government, enter into negotiations. In this regard, Iran’s negotiations with the Taliban, which controls about 70 percent of Afghanistan, is an issue that can both lead to peace and development in Afghanistan and also prevent the Taliban to fall into the trap of profiteering countries that continue their attempts to push the group towards a monopolist terrorist tool. In simpler terms, Tehran believes that “dialogue and engagement” is the most important tool to encourage the group to play a constructive role in Afghanistan’s peace and development process and to repel terrorism, which is on the rise with the activities of ISIS in Afghanistan.

Third point; the Islamic Republic of Iran has always rejected the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and recognized the government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, headed by Ashraf Ghani, as the official and legal government of Afghanistan. On the other hand, in the face of the Taliban, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always taken into account the Taliban’s position on Iran’s internal developments in recent years. The fact that the Taliban condemns the assassination of Sardar Soleimani and martyr Fakhrizadeh and denounces the killing of Shiites in Afghanistan, as well as the quality and quantity of its activities inside Afghanistan.

Fourth point: It is significant that the fight against ISIS is one of the main activities of the Taliban and withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan is one of their main demands, and its realization is not only a great achievement for the Afghan people, but also for the Islamic Republic of Iran and the region. Today, the Taliban is practically standing up to the ISIS in Afghanistan; the ISIS which, if the depth and scope of its terrorist activities in Afghanistan expand, the consequences will be far more severe for Iran than the activities of ISIS in Iraq and Syria due to Iran’s long and common border with Afghanistan and the special cultural and civilizational convergence of the two countries. Therefore, it is necessary and useful to talk to the Taliban, who seeks to ground ISIS, maintain the security and health of the Shiites, expel the United States from Afghanistan, and bring peace to the country. Of course, the Taliban should also be warned that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not support the Taliban who seeks violence, monopolistic power-seeking and insecurity.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading