Alarm Bell for Iraq Following US Sanction on Hashd Al-Shaabi Commander

2021/01/16 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The American adventurism in Iraq is not over and in the latest destructive measure, the US Treasury Department has boycotted Faleh al-Fayyad, the commander of the Iraqi Hashd al-Shaabi, on the pretext of human rights violations! Hamid Khoshayand - International affairs analyst

The move could be the starting point for other sanctions against Iraqi politicians and leaders who do not tolerate US policies in their country. Sanctions are being imposed on al-Fayyad while he had recently warned against plots to tarnish the image of Hashd al-Shaabi Organization. “The withdrawal of American troops will give Iraq real independence, and our response to the assassination of these two martyred commanders is the expulsion of foreign troops,” he said recently martyrdom anniversary of Sardar Soleimani and martyr Abu Mahdi.

Targets

The US administration, which has been the main and the most important element and cause of instability and insecurity in Iraq and most of the current problems in that country, both in the economic and in political-security fields, go back to the policies of the White House, pursues two main objectives in Fayyad’s boycott which can be scrutinized as follows:

  • Weakening of Hashd al-Shaabi

The main answer to the question as why the United States boycotted al-Fayyad should be sought in the performance and position of Hashd al-Shaabi. The al-Fayyad boycott, which is in fact the boycott of an anti-American ideology, comes at a time when the Americans, despite various efforts, have failed in dismantling Hashd al-Shaabi, one of the strategic plans of the White House. Americans, both the Republicans and the Democrats, see Hashd al-Shaabi, which has a special social structure and characteristics, as an organization that thwarts its security and political plans in Iraq.

Hashd al-Shaabi is a popular and legal organization and in fact part of the Iraqi government, which has both a favorable political position and a good popular base. Popularity, emphasis on national unity, defense for ethnic and religious pluralism in Iraq, emphasis on Iraqi national and religious identity, preservation of Iraq’s territorial integrity in the face of Balkanized plans, and countering occupation have all given a special authoritarian aspect to Hashd al-Shaabi. Therefore, Hashd is an organization that is institutionalized and, contrary to the perception of the Americans, it is not easily eliminated or weakened, even by using security, political and legal mechanisms. Therefore, the United States is currently finding the solution in weakening the leadership of this organization, which is the responsibility of Faleh al-Fayyad.

  • Destabilizing Iraq

American plans and strategies in the West Asian region, especially in Iraq, are designed as such that they cannot be implemented in a safe and stable environment. In a simpler term, American plans are written in a way that is easier to be accomplished in an insecure and unstable environment. The Faleh al-Fayyad boycott, which is in fact the boycott of a stabilizing and security-building popular organization in Iraq, essentially pursues the target of creating a split within the organization on the one hand and a split between Hashd al-Shaabi and the Iraqi government on the other hand. For the US administration, this could lead to the weakening of the organizational forces that have played the most important role in destroying ISIS and thwarting US plans in Iraq.

The US administration seeks to pave the way for instability and consequently resurgence of the terrorist groups in Iraq by sanctioning the commander of Hashd al-Shaabi. The resurgence of terrorism in Iraq is also the best excuse for the continued presence of American forces in Iraq because insecurity is a good ground for the US to continue its presence in Iraq. Meanwhile, providing security in various cities and border areas and curbing any operations by terrorist groups and foreign countries is the most important security-military function of the Hashd in Iraq. This causes the Hashd to have the upper hand in military and security strategies and plans, thus destroying the nature and philosophy of the American forces in Iraq.

Dimensions

The boycott of the head of the Hashd al-Shaabi Organization, in addition to the aforementioned targets, also has various dimensions, which are referred to as follows:

First, the Faleh al-Fayyad boycott, under any pretext, means nothing more than the US administration’s hostile approach to the Axis of Resistance. The US government has a problem with the Islamic resistance and is opposed to its activities which are only in the direction of achieving peace and security in the region. Therefore, it uses any means to express this opposition and prevent the peaceful and security activities of the groups and leaders of the resistance, and assassination and sanctions are the two cases of such important tools.

Second, the Fayyad boycott should not be analyzed in the context of Iraq alone. Al-Fayyad is the commander of one of the most important regional organizations with more than 100,000 forces; therefore, the boycott of Fayyad, meaning the boycott of Hashd al-Shaabi which is one of the important pillars of Iraqi power and Islamic resistance, also has regional objectives.

Thirdly, Hashd al-Shaabi is not only a military and security organization, but also operates in the economic, civil and construction fields, and has provided valuable services in Iraq so far. From this perspective, the boycott of the commander of Hashd al-Shaabi Organization means confronting the process of development and progress in Iraq, for which Hashd is one of the effective factors in advancing this process.

Fourthly, the boycott of Faleh al-Fayyad, although an illegal act against the Iraqi people and the sovereignty and national interests of that country, in a special sense means the explicit recognition of the United States of the military, security and political power of that organization. The Hashd al-Shaabi is the most important political force in Iraq, which continues to insist that American forces should evacuate Iraq.

Meanwhile, Washington hoped to be able to prevent the follow up of the assassination case of Haj Qassem and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis as well as the follow up of the parliamentary resolution through the influence it enjoyed in different parts. However, the boycott of the commander of Hashd al-Shaabi, which intends to intimidate other Iraqi officials and personalities in pursuing the parliamentary resolution, shows that Washington’s efforts through its infiltrators have been thwarted and that the White House has entered the scene directly. On the other hand, the recent sanctions show Washington’s inability to use the military option to counter Hashd al-Shaabi; because the Americans are well aware that it is not in their best interest to escalate the military conflict, otherwise they would have reacted sharply to the targeting of their military convoys in Iraq in recent weeks.

Conclusion

According to what was written, the US administration has problems with the resistance groups and grassroots organizations at the top of which stands Hashd al-Shaabi Organization and cannot accept their activities and positive role on the path of peace, security and safeguarding the Iraqi territorial integrity. The US consideration and view is that when the people’s forces enter the field of defense and security in a country like Iraq, there would no longer remain any justification for the presence and activity of the American forces.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Iran’s Position in the Regional Balance of Power

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated that following the end of the 12-day war between the Israeli regime and Iran, which began on June 12 with the regime’s aggressive attacks on our country’s soil, resulting in the martyrdom of several military commanders, nuclear scientists, and even civilians, many questions arose. Among them was how Iran managed to shift the regional balance of power in its favor despite the extensive attacks by the Israeli regime on our country.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Iran’s Position in the Regional Balance of Power

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A researcher on West Asian affairs stated that following the end of the 12-day war between the Israeli regime and Iran, which began on June 12 with the regime’s aggressive attacks on our country’s soil, resulting in the martyrdom of several military commanders, nuclear scientists, and even civilians, many questions arose. Among them was how Iran managed to shift the regional balance of power in its favor despite the extensive attacks by the Israeli regime on our country.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر