Escalation of tension between China and the United States and the future of mutual relations

2020/11/06 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A Shahid Beheshti University scholar says the present rivalry between China and the United States is an effort to attract more markets, adding that the economic dependence and mutual needs of the two countries would prevent a military confrontation between them.

Ali Bigdeli told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the Chinese have not yet lost the US lucrative market for their goods and would therefore not allow tensions with the US government to escalate to a degree which could endanger such commercial relations.

Referring to the intensification of tensions between China and the United States, Bigdeli said ‘it does not appear that differences between China and the United States have reached its peak as the Chinese would not allow tensions damage its trade relations.’

He said China and the United States registered about 750 billion dollars in bilateral trade relations at its peak, adding that Chinese owned more than half of the trade balance with the United States.

‘Of this amount, between 400 to 500 billion dollars was in favour of Chinese export to the US. Of course, some has reduced during the past four years when Trump came into power. However, the US is unable to continue its commercial life without China and China cannot deprive itself of the huge profits of the American market for its goods. As we see, in spite of these differences, China has stepped up its imports from the US.’

Bigdeli pointed to the escalation of the trade war between the US and China despite the conditions created as the result of US elections and China’s retaliatory move in the framework of law to reciprocate US measures, saying differences between the two countries have heightened due to self-centred mutually-exclusive thinking and isolationism of the Republican Party against any international law, institute and consensus.

Referring to the significance of China in the debates and competitions between the two major candidates in the US elections, he said Joe Biden attacked Trump policies towards China and blamed him for such misgiving as the market of China if very profitable for American goods and US companies should not lose such a market in this way.

He said the US policy of confrontation with China, as we see it today, is being pursued only by the Republicans and it is highly unlikely the US wants severance of relations and communications with China even though there is already chaos in relations between the two powers.

Bigdeli highlighted the estimation of the International Monetary Fund on China’s economic growth by 2020 and said the intensification of tensions can be blamed on the US concern of China’s economic growth and its economic future.

‘Rivalry between China and the United States is an effort aimed at attracting more markets. Even though China is less likely to replace US climate and natural advantages and has failed so far to take over US dollar despite making a great deal of efforts, Americans consider China as their number one enemy.’

He said China is trying hard in political and economic fronts to gain more power and influence over the US and changing some of its strategic policies in its rivalry with the US, adding that China, in addition to playing a more active political role, has succeeded in recent years to enter markets in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf sheikhdoms.

Referring to regular US arms sells to Taiwan and pressure on China over the issue of Uighurs, he said the rivalry between China and the US would never result in a military confrontation in spite of the escalation of tension between them because it is not in the US interest and China is not in a position to engage itself in a military confrontation while being at the threshold of economic growth.

‘For a country which is on the edge of becoming the world’s number one economy, it is irrational to engage in war and conflict.’

He said the probable victory of Joe Biden in the US elections would be in the interest of China and defuse tensions, adding that ‘if Republicans win, Trump would not seek war with China and would take any action which would ruin the foundation of relations with China.’

Bigdeli said China would be disadvantaged if Trump is re-elected because Republicans seek anti-leftist tendencies, adding that differences may growth with China if Trump wins the elections while Biden, as a Democrat, would defuse tensions.

‘Notwithstanding, both China and the US would manage their relations in a way tensions are controllable.’

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Loading