Players behind Resignation of Mustapha Adib

2020/10/03 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The most likely scenario Lebanon is presently faced with is not to allow the prime minister proposed by Michel Aoun to form government in the absence of the consent of Saad Hariri, Fouad Siniora and Samir Geagea, and finally, with the widening of political vacuum, the Lebanese President will be forced to appoint Saad Hariri to form the government. Hassan Hanizadeh – Expert on Middle East Affairs

On Saturday, September 26, Mustapha Adib, who had been appointed to form the cabinet less than a month earlier resigned, saying he could not fulfil the task of forming a government. He apologized for failing to meet the demands of the Lebanese people to establish a reformist government. Hours after the announcement of Mustapha Adib’s stepping down those close to the French president said that Adib’s resignation was the result of “a collective betrayal of the Lebanese political parties.”

Reacting to the resignation, French President Emmanuel Macron also said the Lebanese groups had explicitly opposed respecting their commitment to France and the international community. According to Macron, Lebanese officials preferred individual interests to national interests. The French president also said that former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri made a mistake to add tribal criterion to the distribution of ministerial posts; there was no such a thing as tribe in that initiative.

In fact, Mustapha Adib’s refusal to form government is the result of some domestic, regional and international events. Internally, the sabotage of the triangle of Saad Hariri and Fouad Siniora, former Lebanese prime ministers, and Samir Geagea, Leader of the Lebanese Forces, in the process of forming a technocrat and non-political government should not be ignored. Hariri, Siniora, and Geagea, after appointment of Mustapha Adib as the Prime Minister of Lebanon, set new conditions for him. These three influential Lebanese figures called on the Adib government to put key ministries at the disposal of March 14 Movement Alliance and refrain from participating the March 8 Alliance. But since Mustapha Adib sought to form a technocrat government far from traditional Lebanese tribal demands, he opposed Hariri, Siniora and Geagea’s request. In the regional dimension, Saudi Arabia and the UAE made their financial assistance to the new Lebanese government conditional on the disarmament of the Hezbollah, which was opposed by the proposed Prime Minister Mustapha Adib, President Michel Aoun and Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. In this crisis, Saudi Arabia is seeking to return Saad Hariri to power. Therefore, Riyadh has played a role in sabotaging formation of the government, and its attempts are aimed at re-appointment of either Fouad Siniora or Saad Hariri as prime minister.

In international dimension, France had asked Mustapha Adib’s government to hand over the posts of Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Finance and Minister of Defense to the figures with dual Lebanese-French nationalities. However, despite the fact that Mustapha Adib has a French wife and holds dual French citizenship, he opposed the proposal.

It should be noted that France considers itself the kind mother of Lebanon and has always tried to resolve crisis based on its own patterns and interests in the event of a crisis in Lebanon. Therefore, it is possible that within the next days a high-ranking French political figure visit Beirut in order to resolve the crisis of the formation of the Lebanese government. The best scenario for France in the case of Lebanon is that persons like Adib or Hassan Diab who are inclined towards France be appointed.

France is reluctant with regard to the appointment of Hariri as Hariri’s time has expired for France, and Paris is looking for a figure with less political and financial corruption.

The United States also openly called on Mustapha Adib to remove Hezbollah from the Lebanese power structure as a first step, which was opposed by Mustapha Adib, Michel Aoun and Nabih Berri.

However, in this process, Hezbollah actually played the role of a balancing hammer. Although Hezbollah has the most parliamentary seats, it has never sought its shares in the power structure, but what is important for it is to maintain its popular and social status.

Therefore, as a result of these pressures and after 3 weeks of consultations and bringing formation of the cabinet to a deadlock, Mr. Adib withdrew from continuing his task.

The most likely scenario Lebanon is presently faced with is not to allow the prime minister proposed by Michel Aoun to form a government without the consent of Saad Hariri, Fouad Siniora and Samir Geagea, and finally with the widening of political vacuum, the Lebanese President will be forced to appoint Saad Hariri to form the cabinet.

However, the Lebanese people also have the experience of doing things better in the absence of a stable government and run their affairs better than in the presence of a government.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading