Reasons for Central Banks to Increase Gold Reserves

2022/01/18 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The central banks in various countries have recently begun to increase their gold reserves, so that the reserves of this precious metal have reached their highest level in the last three decades. Such a trend becomes even more important when the measure of the central banks coincides with a reduction in the US dollar assets and in the midst of Federal Reserve meetings to decide on the US interest rates and purchase of bonds. Reza Majidzadeh – Director of Simorgh Development Working Group, Pasargad Millennium Plan Think Tank

Even though nearly five decades have passed since the dollar-gold relationship broke down, the connection between them is still of great importance. In fact, the relationship between gold and the US dollar is very old and there is an inverse relationship between them today; as the appreciation of the dollar will lead to lower gold prices. Likewise, if there is an increase in the price of gold today, it will indicate a weakening of the US dollar. The exchange rate equals the purchasing power of different currencies; that is to say, the exchange rate between national currencies is adjusted to match the price ratio of countries; but in practice, in the long run, the exchange rate is separated from purchasing power parity. However, changes in relative price levels are one of the determinants of the exchange rate; therefore, variables affecting the purchasing power parity and relative prices and prices of key elements (such as the interest rates) affect the relationship between currencies and the decision to exchange foreign exchange reserves or alternative assets (such as gold). In addition, the dollar is a dominant global currency, and the rise and fall of the US dollar is influential in determining the value of the currencies of other countries; but the increase or decrease of the value of gold has no effect on the value of the national currency of countries; particularly after the severance of the dollar-gold relationship by Nixon in the 1970s and the end of the Bretton Woods system, countries no longer need gold to back their national currency, and for national economies, gold acts as a safe and covert asset.

Given the widespread debate in the Federal Reserve for making decision over the interest rate, the gold market and gold reserves have become increasingly sensitive as political tensions over Ukraine increase the desire to buy gold among traders and the accumulation of gold reserves among central banks has increased. In fact, gold is considered as a safe haven before inflationary pressures and risk coverage in the field of potential tensions in Europe. It was at the September 2021 meeting of the Federal Reserve that the decline in bond purchases for November last year and the increase in the interest rate for this year was predicted. At the time, such forecast and warning led to a decline in the value of gold, but now, despite the decline and fluctuation in the value of gold, the World Gold Council has reported that the central banks have increased their gold reserves by more than 4,500 tons. Although the long-term roots of such a trend can be traced back to the 2008 financial crisis and efforts of the countries to accumulate safe-haven assets during the crisis, in the continuation of this trend, efforts of emerging economies to transit from pure reliance on the dollar system in global trade and finance have also been the bedrock of the increase in gold reserves.

Measures such as exclusion of the dollar from market transactions in China and the dominance of the yuan, along with the efforts of other countries to consolidate bilateral or multilateral currency pacts that have intensified since Donald Trump’s trade war, although not being able yet to seriously shake the position of the dollar as the dominant global currency, it marks the beginning of a process that reflects the simultaneous efforts of the emerging economies to de-monopolize international financial relations. Although such trends do not seem to lead to the replacement of another dominant currency in the international economy, the likely outcome will be creation of competing currency-trading systems that will reduce the transaction costs for the emerging economies, given the prospect of continuing economic-political tensions.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

The Necessity of Vigilance in Confronting the Zionist Regime’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime, which enjoyed the comprehensive support of the United States in its recent aggression against Iran, initially believed that with the surprise in the early days, the war would end quickly and the Islamic Republic of Iran would be defeated. However, contrary to the calculations of the regime and the White House, Iran immediately seized the initiative and, in response to the attacks and aggression of the Zionist regime and in self-defense, inflicted irreparable blows on this regime. As a result, the regime was ultimately scrambling to stop the attacks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

The Necessity of Vigilance in Confronting the Zionist Regime’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime, which enjoyed the comprehensive support of the United States in its recent aggression against Iran, initially believed that with the surprise in the early days, the war would end quickly and the Islamic Republic of Iran would be defeated. However, contrary to the calculations of the regime and the White House, Iran immediately seized the initiative and, in response to the attacks and aggression of the Zionist regime and in self-defense, inflicted irreparable blows on this regime. As a result, the regime was ultimately scrambling to stop the attacks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر