Turkey’s Targets, Interests in Possible Attack on North Syria

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on international affairs considered the growing domestic criticism of Erdogan’s policies as an important factor in putting nationalist and emotional issues on the agenda, such as attack on Kurdish armed groups in north Syria, adding: From the internal point of view, the Turkish president needs to carry out military operations on the Syrian soil, but such attack could slow down or disrupt the process of negotiations of the Syrian groups on drafting the constitution.

Rahman Ghahremanpour, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to some published reports that Turkey is ready to conduct two military operations in Syria without prior notice, and said one of the important issues raised in Erdogan’s meeting with Biden on the sidelines of the G20 summit was the Turkish military attack on north Syria, adding: James Jeffrey, the former US Special Representative for Syria, has stated that the US did not agree with the Turkish attack on north Syria.

Passive US position

At the same time, he added: But the statements of Erdogan and some other people indicate that although the United States did not agree, it did not oppose either and took a passive position. In fact, it seems that such a case does not matter much for the US.

The expert on international affairs, recalling that the United States has traditionally sided with the Kurds in the Middle East, said: Since 2019, when Trump announced his intention to leave Syria, it became clear that US support for the Kurds was also declining. At the same time, some Democrats demanded that the United States not withdraw from Syria, and Trump temporarily halted the withdrawal of US troops from the Kurdish areas of Syria; however, it became clear that the long-term policy of the United States is not to stay in the Kurdish regions of Syria.

Possibility of Turkish military operation

Ghahremanpour, stating that on the sidelines of the G20 summit, the United States neither gave the green light to Turkey, nor did it have any serious opposition, or its opposition was very passive, continued: It was said that the country intended to start its operation on November 2; but in his recent remarks, Erdogan did not speak decisively in this regard, saying only that he would take whatever measure necessary, so it is not clear whether this military action is definite or not.

At the same time, he said: Given the developments that have taken place in Syria and given that the government of that country is gradually exercising its sovereignty over the whole of Syria, such military action of Turkey this time, more than before, has faced international opposition.

Referring to the expression of interest of some Arab countries to strengthen and expand relations with Syria and increase in the cost of any military action against Syria by Turkey, the international affairs analyst noted: Erdogan seems to need this military action internally, because criticism against him and his government’s economic policies has risen sharply in the past two months, and a recent poll showed that if Erdogan’s opponents and rivals could get united they could defeat him in the next presidential elections.

Ghahremanpour continued: On the other hand; the devaluation of lira against dollar and 20 percent inflation and political interferences in the central bank’s policies have drawn a great deal of criticism of the Turkish president; while, it should be borne in mind that Biden and leaders of European countries are keenly looking for an opportunity to weaken Erdogan and remove him from the scene of Turkish politics.

He said: In such circumstances, Erdogan has usually shown that in order to manage public opinion, and in particular his supporters, he is trying to put a nationalist and emotional issue on the agenda, such as attacking Kurdish armed groups. In the two operations “Shield of the Euphrates” and “Claw”, we witnessed that with the beginning of such operation, even his opponents inside, cautiously criticized the operations and considered it in favor of Turkish security.

The international affairs analyst added that the operation that Turkey intends to carry out in Syria is an attempt to cut off the Kurds in the east and west of Syria and form a continuous strip in the north of Syria and create a buffer zone between the Kurds in Syria and Turkey. This measure strengthens nationalist sentiments at the level of public opinion and to some extent increases support for Erdogan.

 

Turkey’s concern about Russia-US reaction

Ghahremanpour, referring to the news about deployment of Russian fighters to areas of Hasakah in northeast Syria, simultaneously with the Turkish troops lining up in those areas, continued: Although Erdogan, like Putin, in some cases acts fearlessly, he is a cautious politician and takes action when he is sure that he will not face with a serious reaction from Russia and the United States. So if he concludes that he will not face a sharp reaction from Russia and the United States, he will probably carry out the operations. He is evaluating reactions and positions these days.

He further referred to the Syrian military moves to maintain its territorial integrity and efforts to withdraw Turkish troops from its territory and said: According to the agreement that Syria has made with the Syrian Kurdish Defense Units, the security of the northern regions has been entrusted to this group. Of course, those units are not militarily capable of confronting the Turkish army, and there is a kind of military imbalance.

Ghahremanpour said: Turkey may suffer some casualties in such possible operations; as in recent days, it was faced with the firing of rockets from Kurdish areas, killing two Turkish soldiers; but in general, as we saw in Operation Euphrates Shield and Claw, neither the government of Syria nor the Kurdish People’s Units alone can stand against Turkey. For this reason, Turkey seeks to neutralize protests and reactions of the United States and Russia. Of course, in the international arena, Turkey will also face protests, because this attack in the current situation could slow down and disrupt the process of negotiations between the Syrian groups on t drafting of the constitution.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading