Consequences and objectives of the joint military drills of China and Russia

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: Numerous joint military drilles between China and Russia in recent years could be considered as one of the clear manifestations of the expansion and consolidation of cooperation between the two countries especially in the military front. Mohammad Javad Qahremani—PhD in International Relations

Even though the two countries have held several bilateral and multilateral joint military drills in the past two decades, the quality and dimensions of such drills are gradually expanding and becoming sophisticated. Notwithstanding, the recent military maneuver between Russia and China codenamed “Zapad/Interaction-2021” which began on Monday 09 August 2021 in Ningxia Hui in northwestern China cannot be assessed without attention to the status quo of relations between Moscow and Beijing.

 

A review of the recent year’s relations between China and Moscow indicates that 2014 is a turning point in bilateral relations. The crisis of Ukraine which was accompanied by various pressures by the West against Russia, guided Moscow to find a reliable partner in the East. Even though the leaders of Russia were aware of the long-term challenges in their relations with China, proximity with Beijing would provide an appropriate tool for this country to confront European and American countries. At least, in the energy dimension, China would provide a proper alternative market for this country.

However, these relations were not limited solely to the energy sector but also included numerous economic and military areas. In 2018, bilateral trade between Russia and China reached about 100 billion dollars and in the military sector, cooperation between the two included various dimensions such as the selling of weapons, holding joint military exercises, nuclear cooperation and other issues.

On the other hand, Beijing put on its foreign policy agenda the expansion of relations with Moscow for many strategic, military and economic reasons. This expansion of relations has become more critical for Beijing with the escalation of tension with the United States.

On such a basis, the recent military drill should be viewed within the framework of expansion of cooperation in the military sector. Holing military wargames is on one hand suggestive of the level of mutual trust between the two sides and on the other, presents a warning to the common threats of the two countries. The number of joint military drills of the two countries in recent years is well demonstrative of the will of the parties to expand military cooperation and coordination.

Notwithstanding, confrontation with probable threats of the two countries is another motivator of China and Russia in holding military drills. Under the present circumstances, especially after the withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan, uncertainty towards future of the Central and Southern Asia regions is the common concern of the Chinese and Russian leaders. Like the counter-terrorism mechanism of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Moscow and Beijing have serious determination for demonstrating their ability to precent a common security commodity. Until recently, it was imagined that the US is responsible for that. In the same manner, the introduction and presentation of the self as a responsible activist would be a result of cooperation in line with strengthening stability and combating insecurity in this region.

In addition to the above issues, the role of the United States in the recent reservations of relations between Moscow and Beijing should not be ignored. Following the meeting between Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin in June, numerous discussions were made in academic and policy making circles concerning that the United States is seeking the advancement of the policy of détente with Russia in order to make it distant from China. Following this meeting, the Chinese officials emphasized stability in their relations with Russia and after that, the two sides renewed the strategic, friendship and cooperation participation agreement. Under such conditions, holding a joint military drill could be considered as China’s determination to expand relations with Russia and of course a warning to the US that China’s relations with Russia are inviolable.

There are several outstanding features about the recent military maneuver which makes it distinguishable from the previous military drills: this joint military drill was the first joint exercise hosted by China after the outbreak of Covid-19. Moreover, in this drill, the military forces of Russia participating in the drills used some of the equipment of the China’s Army. In the military drill of 2020 in the Caucasus, for the first time, the Russian military equipment and arms were used by the participating military forces of China. One of the other outstanding features of the recent military drill was the presence of some advanced weaponry of China such as the G-20 fighter jets.

In addition to China, Russia has a lot of motivation too to join common military drills with China due to the lack of trust to Western policies. Moreover, holding joint military drills in the highest level of use of weapons could provide Moscow with this opportunity that even in view of the efforts of the West to deescalate tensions, it can exploit the expansion of its relations with Beijing as a tool to exert pressure on the West and or gain more concessions.

In conclusion, the recent military drill demonstrates the effort of China and Russia to enhance cooperation in confronting common threats which could be created in the coming months or years in the region. It also sends a serious signal to their systemic rival ie the United States, In sum, the two parties enjoy sufficient motivation to maintain the present progressive trend which has been the main feature of their relations in the past several years.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading