Dimensions, Messages of Saudi, Pakistan and US air maneuver

Strategic Council Online - Former Iranian ambassador in Pakistan said that the joint exercise of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United States was a positive message from both sides, despite some resentments, adding: The resentment and despair of the Pakistanis is not so great as to have a profound effect on the building blocks and key components of the strengthening of Saudi-Pakistani relations.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mashallah Shakeri said that the joint air exercise of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United States has messages, noting: For various reasons, Pakistan-Saudi relations are not very favorable in the current situation and do not have the prominence of the past. However, the expectations of the two sides were not met and there is some mutual resentment in the political arena; but this does not mean that the resentment would be extended to other regions.

Referring to the influence and position of the military in Pakistan’s political system, he added: In that country, the military has roles both on and behind the scenes, and wherever it is felt that politicians should not come forward, the military enters and is usually considered the backbone of maintaining relations; therefore, this joint exercise seems to be a positive message from both sides.

Ties among Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the US in military arena

Recalling that the three countries have some ties in military arena, the Iranian diplomat said: Structure of the army and the armed forces of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have a lot in common with each other, including in the area of military equipment, aircraft and other equipment that are typically American, higher education of the military officers of the two countries in the United States and therefore their military structure is American.

Shakeri referred to Saudi-Pakistani military interactions and continued: For example, Mr. Raheel Sharif, the former commander of the Pakistani army, was appointed as the commander of the coalition that Saudi Arabia formed as the Counter-Terrorism Coalition. There are unconfirmed reports that Pakistani military forces are assisting Saudi Arabia directly or indirectly at lower levels.

The expert on international affairs added: Bahrain, Jordan and Egypt were the three countries that participated in this exercise as observers, which shows a kind of similarity in policies with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Emphasizing the need to pay attention to the unity and dependence of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in the economic and military fields, he continued: In any case, Pakistan has enjoyed Saudi generosity to Muslim countries in need and has benefited from Saudi Arabia’s position from different angles. Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, needs Pakistan, which is mainly in the field of skilled and expert manpower in the military.

Pakistani-Saudi military relations

Shakeri referred to the historical evidence of the close relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, adding: Saudi Arabia has paid attention to Pakistan both historically and at different times, which have deep roots and cannot be eliminated in the relations between the two countries. The Pakistani military has significant trade-offs in both Saudi military training and joint maneuvers.

The former Iranian ambassador to Islamabad added: In a way, the Pakistanis have guaranteed the supply of Saudi military demands at any time and in any amount and level they can. In addition, US domination of relations between the two countries is very influential in the proximity of the two countries.

Saying that the Pakistanis expected more from Saudi Arabia’s support for the Kashmir issue, he said: However, the resentment and despair of the Pakistanis is not enough to have a profound effect on the building blocks and key components of the strengthening of Saudi-Pakistani relations. It is a miscalculation to think that there is a difference in the relations between the two countries. Relations between the two countries are still in place. Although there is a rift in this relationship, we cannot attribute it to their military relations.

However, Shakeri stressed: The Pakistanis are not waiting for orders to regulate their relations with other countries, and they have their own parameters and components in regulating their foreign relations, as we see in their relations with China, which is not very desirable to the United States.

Referring to the objectives of the exercise, he said that it is normal and natural to do it with other countries every year and added: Pakistan holds regular exercises with the Chinese every year, Pakistan naval exercises with Japan and South Korea to ensure maritime security are noteworthy. They have held several air and naval exercises with China, Turkey, Russia and Saudi Arabia. They have had two exercises with Iran; therefore, joint military exercises of Pakistani military forces with other countries is not a new and innovative issue.

In Pakistan’s view, exercises are not a message to a third country

Saying that the Pakistanis do not see the exercises as a signal to other countries, and despite some references to their traditional rival, India, say they are not a threat to a third country, Shakeri said: The exercise was dubbed the “Aces Meet 2021” maneuvers. Although the concept of terrorism is different in the eyes of the three countries, they have emphasized that given that the armed forces and their military structure are of the same gender, those exercises make them realize their strengths and weaknesses.

He also said that the level of the closing ceremony they held was not excellent and outstanding and their honorary guest was the Saudi ambassador to Islamabad and the representative of the Americans was the air attaché of the US embassy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

France’s Role-Making in West Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European issues spoke about France’s efforts to negotiate with regional countries on the Gaza war; West Asia is having hard times and in the process of transformation; Netanyahu is finished, and everyone is preparing for a significant change.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

France’s Role-Making in West Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European issues spoke about France’s efforts to negotiate with regional countries on the Gaza war; West Asia is having hard times and in the process of transformation; Netanyahu is finished, and everyone is preparing for a significant change.

Loading