Russia the Main Target in Transfer of American Troops from Germany to Poland

Strategic Council Online - Perhaps one of the goals of the United States in transferring troops from Germany to Poland is to divert Moscow's attention to Russia's western borders, forcing the Russians to spend a significant portion of their troops and equipment, as well as their military budgets on the western borders. Seyed Reza Mirtaher - Expert in Military and Strategic Issues

One of the main propaganda themes of President Donald Trump during his frequent trips to Europe ever since he entered the White House in January 2017 has been criticizing NATO member states for failing to spend 2% of their GDP on defense and military issues. In particular, Trump has sharply criticized Germany as Europe’s largest economy and the most important country in the European Union and NATO.

The Germans currently spend about 1.3 to 1.4 percent of their GDP on defense. Of course, Berlin has repeatedly promised to increase this to two percent, but in practice it has not yet done this. That is why it was almost two months ago that the President of the United States suddenly announced that he would lower the number of American troops in Germany from 34,000 to 22,000. The Pentagon later raised the issue, with Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announcing that some of the troops would return to the United States and that some would be relocated to other European countries, including Italy, Poland and the Baltic republics.

But it seems that the main goal of the United States, which, of course, was fulfilled under the pretext of Germany’s failure to stick to its defense commitments, is basically to increase the number of its troops in Eastern Europe, especially in the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as Poland. It serves as a barrier between the West and Russia. The Poles are deeply afraid of Russian threats, especially after the Ukraine crisis, given their experiences during World War II that a tacit agreement was reached between Stalin and Hitler over the partition of Poland. Therefore, the Poles seek to increase security guarantees, especially to boost the presence of NATO forces in the country.

The United States, as the most important member of NATO, which, of course, pursues its own interests and goals from the siege of Russia and increasing confrontation with this country, aligns its goal with Poland, and we see that at least 1,000 to 1,500 of American troops will be transferred to Poland. In fact another part of the American forces will be present in Poland on a rotating basis. Washington’s move has provoked reaction from Russia, and the Kremlin has warned the United States in this regard.

Recently, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stressed that NATO seeks to increase confrontation with Russia and expand Eastward. This raises Moscow’s sensitivity to the West’s real intentions and reveals the reasons for the growing military presence, the strengthening of the military, and the growing trend of heavy military equipment depots in the Baltic states and Poland.

It is now clear that it is the Americans who have provoked Russia and increased confrontation with Moscow in Eastern Europe. Perhaps one of the goals of the United States is to divert Moscow’s attention to Russia’s western borders, forcing the Russians to devote a significant portion of their forces and equipment, as well as their military budget, to the western borders. The Americans had a similar approach to the Soviet Union earlier in the Cold War and tried to destroy the Soviet economy by creating a massive arms race, which they succeeded to do.

Of course, this US move, which means increasing the number of troops in Poland, must be analyzed along with other measures, especially withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty or INF; because these cases together indicate that the United States has a hand in the development and deployment of short-range and medium-range missiles equipped with low-power nuclear warheads. At the same time, it is speculated that the United States may deploy short- and medium-range missiles in countries such as Poland or the Baltic republics, which pose a direct threat to Russia’s national security, in the not-too-distant future, given that it is not subject to the restrictions of the INF. This, of course, will provoke a backlash from Russia, although the Russians have for several years, in response to the US deployment of anti-missile systems in Poland, deployed Alexander missile systems in two types of cruise and ballistic missiles in the Kaliningrad region, an area remote from Russia and near Poland. In general, the US military action in Europe seems to be one that will increase Russia’s presence and provoke reciprocal reactions. Undoubtedly, this strategy of the Trump administration will not be in the interest of European security and international security.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading