loader image

Russia the Main Target in Transfer of American Troops from Germany to Poland

Strategic Council Online - Perhaps one of the goals of the United States in transferring troops from Germany to Poland is to divert Moscow's attention to Russia's western borders, forcing the Russians to spend a significant portion of their troops and equipment, as well as their military budgets on the western borders. Seyed Reza Mirtaher - Expert in Military and Strategic Issues

One of the main propaganda themes of President Donald Trump during his frequent trips to Europe ever since he entered the White House in January 2017 has been criticizing NATO member states for failing to spend 2% of their GDP on defense and military issues. In particular, Trump has sharply criticized Germany as Europe’s largest economy and the most important country in the European Union and NATO.

The Germans currently spend about 1.3 to 1.4 percent of their GDP on defense. Of course, Berlin has repeatedly promised to increase this to two percent, but in practice it has not yet done this. That is why it was almost two months ago that the President of the United States suddenly announced that he would lower the number of American troops in Germany from 34,000 to 22,000. The Pentagon later raised the issue, with Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announcing that some of the troops would return to the United States and that some would be relocated to other European countries, including Italy, Poland and the Baltic republics.

But it seems that the main goal of the United States, which, of course, was fulfilled under the pretext of Germany’s failure to stick to its defense commitments, is basically to increase the number of its troops in Eastern Europe, especially in the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as Poland. It serves as a barrier between the West and Russia. The Poles are deeply afraid of Russian threats, especially after the Ukraine crisis, given their experiences during World War II that a tacit agreement was reached between Stalin and Hitler over the partition of Poland. Therefore, the Poles seek to increase security guarantees, especially to boost the presence of NATO forces in the country.

The United States, as the most important member of NATO, which, of course, pursues its own interests and goals from the siege of Russia and increasing confrontation with this country, aligns its goal with Poland, and we see that at least 1,000 to 1,500 of American troops will be transferred to Poland. In fact another part of the American forces will be present in Poland on a rotating basis. Washington’s move has provoked reaction from Russia, and the Kremlin has warned the United States in this regard.

Recently, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stressed that NATO seeks to increase confrontation with Russia and expand Eastward. This raises Moscow’s sensitivity to the West’s real intentions and reveals the reasons for the growing military presence, the strengthening of the military, and the growing trend of heavy military equipment depots in the Baltic states and Poland.

It is now clear that it is the Americans who have provoked Russia and increased confrontation with Moscow in Eastern Europe. Perhaps one of the goals of the United States is to divert Moscow’s attention to Russia’s western borders, forcing the Russians to devote a significant portion of their forces and equipment, as well as their military budget, to the western borders. The Americans had a similar approach to the Soviet Union earlier in the Cold War and tried to destroy the Soviet economy by creating a massive arms race, which they succeeded to do.

Of course, this US move, which means increasing the number of troops in Poland, must be analyzed along with other measures, especially withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty or INF; because these cases together indicate that the United States has a hand in the development and deployment of short-range and medium-range missiles equipped with low-power nuclear warheads. At the same time, it is speculated that the United States may deploy short- and medium-range missiles in countries such as Poland or the Baltic republics, which pose a direct threat to Russia’s national security, in the not-too-distant future, given that it is not subject to the restrictions of the INF. This, of course, will provoke a backlash from Russia, although the Russians have for several years, in response to the US deployment of anti-missile systems in Poland, deployed Alexander missile systems in two types of cruise and ballistic missiles in the Kaliningrad region, an area remote from Russia and near Poland. In general, the US military action in Europe seems to be one that will increase Russia’s presence and provoke reciprocal reactions. Undoubtedly, this strategy of the Trump administration will not be in the interest of European security and international security.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading