Strategic Consequences of Increase in US Military Budget

2023/01/02 | Defense & Security, Opinion

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: The US military budget for 2023 with an “unprecedented” figure of 858 billion dollars, which is 80 billion dollars more than this year’s military budget, was approved by the Senate with 83 votes in favor and 11 votes against. This issue has faced many criticisms within the United States. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on international affairs

Allocation of 10 billion dollars in aid to Taiwan and 6 billion dollars to contain Russia in Europe, 600 million dollars of which includes aid to Ukraine, are among the “controversial” parts of the 2023 military budget, which have given it an anti-Chinese and anti-Russian nature. This is in addition to the separate figures allocated in the 2023 military budget to exclude Russia from some international organizations.

Allocation of 858 billion dollars in military budget for just one year shows the growing trend of “militarism” in the US foreign policy, which was formed due to the increasing influence of the “military collection” in it.

This issue, focusing on the approved military spending for 2023, will not only have “significant consequences” in the domestic arena of the United States, but will also create “new challenges” at the international level.

Internal consequences; increase in military spending of the United States in a situation under which the economic indicators and public welfare in that country are decreasing day by day and inflation and costs of living are increasing, will be definitely “troublesome” for the administration and the House of Representatives and the Senate in terms of public opinion.

The US administration has increased the military expenses while the inflation rate of that country has quadrupled compared to the last decade. This year, the inflation rate broke the 40-year record for the first time, and according to official statistics, exceeded 8.5 percent.

At the same time, the prices of energy carriers and fuel consumed by the people have also increased in recent months and the cost of living has increased to the extent that according to a new survey by “Qualtrics Institute”, more than half of the American wage earners are looking for a second job or more to cover their expenses.

Domestic critics, including Biden’s fellow party members, regarding the unprecedented increase in US military spending, believe that in an era of inflation, the Biden administration and most members of the Congress think that the Pentagon should receive more money and the people should receive less money, even in a situation under which the Biden administration to date, has not proposed any legislation to help people during a confusing cost-of-living crisis.

International consequences; increase in military spending of the United States, from one point of view, means the strengthening of the “crisis-making administration” and “biological crisis” in the US, the signs of which can be seen in the country’s regional and international policies.

Abusing various crises in the four corners of the world is the main characteristic of such a government; a government that seeks to intensify the mechanisms of “militarization” in various regions of the world, especially East Asia, Russia’s surrounding area, and West Asia, with an aim of taking advantage politically, economically, militarily, etc.

Allocating a significant amount (10 billion dollars) in the 2023 military budget to Taiwan, of which 2 billion dollars is supposed to be given to Taiwan in the form of weapons in the first step, is a worrying issue that has been met with a strong reaction from China.

While “warning” the US, the Chinese government has asked the Biden administration to remove anti-Chinese spending from the 2023 military budget. Beijing has also warned that if the US continues to play with the Taiwan card against China, that country will take all the necessary measures to defend its sovereignty, security and territorial integrity.

As for allocating funds to push Russia away from Europe and strengthen Ukraine in the war against Moscow, not only this will do nothing to stop the war in Ukraine, but will lead to the escalation of the arms race.

Considering that in the 2023 military budget, arms manufacturing companies, which always play a key role in foreign policy, have been allowed to produce war equipment without restrictions, therefore this issue will also increase arms competition.

As a result, those companies will try to create the basis for the expansion of regional wars and emerging crises in the world in order to obtain “maximum profit” from the sale of weapons.

It is worth noting that of the 14 trillion dollars that the Pentagon has spent since the start of the war in Afghanistan in 2001, one-third to one-half of it has been allocated to defense contractors. For example, in 2022, despite the Biden administration’s rhetoric about supply chain issues and inflationary challenges, military contractors earned higher-than-usual profit margins, Raytheon made 3.9 billion dollars and Lockheed Martin 4.2 billion dollars!

Final point

Representatives of the Congress have increased US military spending for 2023 to such an extent that it even surpassed the peak of the Pentagon’s military budgets during the Cold War! In the words of Stephen Selmer, one of the founders of the Security Policy Reform Institute, this figure puts military budgets during the Cold War to shame! If the US continues this path, we will likely see a trillion dollar annual military budget in the near future.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

Loading