Causes & Consequences of North Korea Missile Tests

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: As a legacy of Cold War era, prevailing concern over Korean peninsula is among challenges which has continued to date even after the (cold) war finished between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Mohammad Javad Ghahremani, Expert on China issues

In 1990’s when the communist government in North Korea was concerned about its existence, it put severely the development of its military capabilities in its agenda. Although at various junctions, several rounds of fruitless negotiations were held with the U.S. about the crisis in the peninsula, but it is still considered as one of the most heated developments in international system.

Within the recent years and during the tenure of office of President Donald Trump in the U.S., despite three unprecedented meetings between him and Kim Jung Un the leader of North Korea held, as was predictable there was no specific achievement emanated from the meetings.

Pyongyang has conducted several missile tests as of September 2021 and the culmination of the tests was during the first half of January 2022. Within less than two weeks there were three hypersonic missile tests; the first was on January 5, the second was a week later on January 12, 2022.

As was referred to in the reports, the last launched missile experienced 10 Mach speed. But it was not the end of the story. On Friday January 14, 2022 two ballistic missiles were tested by Pyongyang again.

Important points can be mentioned on the evaluation of North Korea missile tests;

First, one of the show off power instruments of North Korea is considered to be its missile tests. Pyongyang has always displayed either its anger from the policy of its enemies by missile tests or boasts others about its increasing military capabilities. For example, in this respect hypersonic missiles place North Korea next to China, Russia and the U.S.

Along with it, with its hypersonic missile tests, North Korea will increase its maneuver power particularly with respect to the capabilities of this type of missile (maneuverability, high speed, and flying at lower levels). Likewise, the policy of diversification of missile capability of Pyongyang will increase the possibility to confront with and overcome the existing defensive missile systems in the region.

Yet, one of the issues worth to mention is that short-range and medium-range missile tests indicate that Pyongyang has concentrated on the regional targets. In this way, while developing its missile capability and finding its weak and strength points, North Korea would instigate less sensitivity of the U.S. In such circumstances however, the country can even boost its long- range missiles, but it has now made the U.S. authorities doubt in adopting crucial decision.

This is an important issue too that such a measure can provide Pyongyang an upper hand in any probable diplomatic talks with Joe Biden Administration. Although the U.S. authorities have so far referred to the issue that they are ready for diplomatic interaction with North Korea but it was Pyongyang that showed no warm welcome. In June, the U.S. Special Representative for DPRK said that he is ready to meet with Pyongyang anywhere, anytime and without any precondition.

Having reviewed the pathology of the U.S. policy on North Korea by Biden Administration, it seems that at least within the past year, there was not too much attention paid to North Korea issue in the U.S. foreign policy. In a situation when the U.S. is engaged in several key issues including Taiwan, Ukraine and or Iran nuclear deal, adding the North Korea nuclear issue will further sophisticate the situation for Washington. This will be also favorable to Russia and China when they are at the highest tension level with the U.S. during the past few decades. The tests can also be conducted with the instigation of Russia and China and or with smartness and understanding of Kim Jung Un about the U.S. involvement at other fronts and in order to take more concessions from the country. However, the tests were accompanied with sanctions imposed by the U.S. Department of Treasury against the country.

To conclude, it can be said that North Korea missile tests may experience an escalating trend in the coming year. In that case, Biden Administration will be obliged to put the North Korea dossier once again in its agenda and its priority along with other existing dossiers in the U.S. foreign policy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading