New wave of confrontation between Moscow and West in the East of Ukraine and the Black Sea

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: In recent weeks and parallel with an increase in military movements along the Black Sea and Russia-Ukraine border, this region has been once again brought into the global focus. Seyyed Nader Noorbakhsh-European affairs analyst

Present circumstances are generally rooted in a crisis which erupted since 2014 in the relations between Russia and Ukraine. After that, Russia annexed Crimea to its soil in a referendum—something reciprocated by Western countries with measures such as sanctions on Russia and evicting it from the G8 group of countries.

Remarkable to mention that Ukraine is home to a remarkable population with Russian descent who are mostly residing in the east of the country and are seeking autonomy from Kiev. This is while in recent years, and concurrent with the escalation of tension, the Russian-sympathizer separatist militias in Donbas, east of Ukraine, have resorted to direct military confrontation against the central government in Kiev. At the present time, two self-ruled republics in this region namely Donetsk and Luhansk are out of the control of the federal government. Moreover, during the conflicts of the past seven years, more than 13,000 people have been killed. Russia has denied any interference in the conflicts. Yet it accuses Ukraine of trying to commit genocide of Russian Ukrainians in this region in case it continues with its advancement.  Many of the Russian Ukrainians have received Russian passports since 2019. Ukraine has recently moved a huge number of its military forces to these regions and Russia has reciprocated by sending its military forces and vehicles to its border with Ukraine.  This may change current policy of Russia to support separatists in their direct military confrontation with Ukraine. Ukraine considers confrontations in this region not a domestic conflict but a war between Russia and Ukraine. Kiev has renewed its request to become a NATO member and join the military alliance to seek its support. In the meantime, Ukraine has threatened to move towards the production of nuclear weapons should it not receive sufficient support and action by NATO. Furthermore, Turkey, another important country in the strategic region of the Black Sea, has recently sold military equipment including drones to Ukraine. On one hand, Belarus that is now more inclined towards Russia after last year’s disturbances in the country has stationed military forces to its border with Ukraine and has participated in many wargames with Russia in the region. On the other, the issue of Ukraine has turned into the scene of the presence of foreign forces. During the past several days, various reports have indicated that NATO is deciding to send its marine forces to the Black Sea. According to the Russian minister of defense, NATO has stationed more than 40,000 military troops in Russia’s proximity—a measure which has been harshly criticized by Moscow. Even Kremlin has threatened to stop the movement of warships of foreign third parties to the Black Sea for at least six months. Moreover, Russia has moved some of its warships from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea.

Foreign fighters from other countries have been also involved in both fronts; recently, reports were released indicating that Serbian volunteers from the Balkans have been moved to this region to fight for Russia. In the opposite front, groups from Chechnya, Georgia and some Belarusians opposed to Lukashenko are supporting Ukraine. Moreover, neo-Nazi rightist extremist groups such as the Azov Movement are fighting against Russians. In fact, as against many populist rightist extremist groups that have good relations with Russia, neo-Nazi groups have been able to establish a network in the Scandinavian countries, France, Germany and Austria in support of Ukraine. On such a basis, the involvement of neo-Nazi groups have provided Russia with the chance to introduce, in its media propaganda, its movements as a Russian fight against fascism as in the Second World War.

A glance at the performance of Russia in issues related to Georgia, Crimea, Syria and Belarus suggest that Moscow benefits from its geopolitical advantages properly and is highly unlikely to back down on its positions. After the annexation of Crimea, Ukraine lost some of marine territory in the east of the country. Russia has a upper hand now in the Azov Sea. At the present time, Russia, relying on various leverages, tries to maintain its position. For example, a strategic position for Russia is the Kaliningrad region located in the north of Poland. Russia has turned this region into a base for the stationing of missile platforms capable of targeting many spots in Europe. Moreover, Russia can use tools and leverages against the West and NATO such as energy, cyber-attacks, public opinion manipulation through cyberspace and media and support for Eurosceptic population opposition and anti-NATO groups. Of course, with Joe Biden in the White House, the US would heighten its anti-Russian policies and may impose more sanctions under the excuse of the detention of Navalny and protests in Russia as leverages of pressure for the West.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Strategic Importance of India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on subcontinental issues said that India and the United Arab Emirates are working on the first phase of the creation of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, known as the IMEC Corridor (ArabMed), which is an alternative route to the Strait of Hormuz and China’s Silk Road plan. Although there are some speculations that with the continuation of the war in Gaza and the unrest in the Middle East, work on this corridor may be sidelined.

Withdrawal of Russian Forces from South Caucasus; Strategy or Tactic?

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus affairs said: Following news reports that the Kremlin has implicitly confirmed that Russian peacekeepers are withdrawing from the Nagorno-Karabakh region and taking their weapons and equipment with them, this question is seriously raised: Does Russia want to hand over the South Caucasus region to the West?

Netanyahu’s War Cabinet’s Efforts to Divert Public Opinion from The Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime is trying to “psychologically exploit” the recent events in the region to divert the world public opinion from the crimes this regime is committing in Gaza. Examining the atmosphere prevailing in the political and media circles of the Zionist regime and the centers aligned with it at the regional and international level shows that this regime seeks to “highlight and dominate” the recent tensions with the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it could reduce the heavy pressure that is felt in the domestic, regional, and international public opinion and even European governments against the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Military Confrontation between Iran and the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: In the last hours of April 14, the Islamic Republic of Iran launched a missile and drone attack against the Occupied Territories, which continued until the next morning. This was despite Iran’s prior notification to some regional and transregional countries about the certainty of our country’s response and military action; America and Israel could not prevent this attack.

The Outlook of Geopolitical Competition Among Major Powers in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A Caucasus affairs expert said: “If the trend of divergence among regional countries, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, from Russia accelerates, Russians may show a more serious reaction and even prevent the traditional regional order change using force.”

Loading