Challenges & Consequences of Declining Trend of Russian Gas Export to 12 European Countries

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Member of Scientific Board, Institute of Strategic Studies stated that Europe was one of the main losers of war in Ukraine. He said:” at least in short term, Europe’s economy will pay more prices, and the rising inflation trend followed by recession already in place, will impress global economy including oil-based economies as well as developing countries”.

Mehdi Shapouri in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations pointed out to declining of Russian energy export to Europe and the warning of some of economic authorities on its political and social consequences for these countries and spelled out:” with regards to infrastructures and its finishing within a period of time, Europeans could acquire their required energy from Russia which had a kind of monopoly role in European energy market with much less prices; that’s why it will not be easy to sever the dependence and will bear high price”.
Having stated that most of Russian infrastructures were targeting Europe and recently it diverted them towards China, he said:” Russia used to use energy as a political and geopolitical instrument, with the end of the dependence, Russia will also have to bear considerable costs. But European governments have concluded that sooner or later, they have to pay the price for minimizing their dependence on Russia, and at later stage, they have to put an end to the dependence in order to proceed with independent policies in connection with Russia. In such a situation, Russia will lose one of its most important pivots of its geopolitical game versus Europe.

Substantial Changes in Geopolitics of Energy Export
Having reminded that replacing oil with gas is easier due to the wide range of its producers and its easy transferability for Europe, and they try to reduce as much as 90% of oil import from Russia by the end of 2022, the expert of international affairs added:” we witness the lobbying of European countries to buy oil and gas from central Asian, Caucasian, African and the Middle East countries. The developments have made essential changes in the geopolitics of energy exports and will be completed in future”.
Having emphasized that the cut of energy imports from Russia by Europe is a great development in international economy and geopolitics which has various consequences, Shapouri continued:” at least in short term, European economy will pay more prices and with rising inflation followed by stagnation, this will leave effects on global economy. In view of economies inter-relationship, it will impress oil economies and also developing countries”.
He said:” in view of the mistrust already formed, the delimitation between Russia and Europe will become more serious in long run, and Russia will focus its attention on the export of oil and gas to Asian countries particularly India and China. At the moment, China acquires its required energy with more discounts and better conditions from Russia and Iran in comparison with the West. Moreover, the similar facility is provided to India and its energy imports from Russia is not comparable with the last year. The situation is more suitable for Asian economies in comparison with the Western economies”.
The analyst of international affairs added:” Earlier, Russian oil revenues originated from Europe used to be more than double of its gas revenues. In view of replacing suppliers, Russian oil revenues will be sharply reduced. However, Moscow will sell its oil to other markets and will expand its market. As we witness, the amount of Russian oil exports to China has also surpassed the Saudi Arabia’s oil exports”.
According to Shapouri, Russia will anyway, sell its oil with discounts in the market, but in order to make its routes, it has to pay extra changes too, and it has to pay for oil transfer as well as its insurance to sell its oils to buyers. Therefore, Russia’s economy will seriously be impressed by the new situation.
Having referred to surpassing of the U.S. gas export to Europe comparing with that of Russia’s, and registration of a historic record, the scientific board member of Institute for Strategic Studies spelled out:” the U.S. can replace a noticeable part of European dependence on Russian gas with very high prices. If Europe can not manage to procure a part of its gas requirements from Asian countries, it may consider the investment on transferring the U.S. gas through pipeline, which is coupled with its own geopolitical and political consequences”.
The expert of international affairs referred to the Europeans dissatisfaction and the losses incurred upon industries followed by the problems caused by rising energy prices. Having stated that one of the senior managers of a French energy supplier company had warned about threatening of Europe’s social and political integration because of energy rising prices, he added:” Europe was one of the main losers of war in Ukraine, that economically lost a lot in the light of these developments”.

Possible Rising Dissatisfactions & Demonstrations of Europeans
Having elaborated the consequences caused by limitation of energy supply to European countries in long term, Shapouri added:” when the effects of limits and rising energy prices in Europe reveal thoroughly, there will be social dissatisfactions and protests. In such an atmosphere, Right wing raises populistic slogans and thus will have greater chance for activity”.
The scientific board member of Institute for Strategic Studies stated that in order to keep Europe in unison with its consensus, the U.S. will pay attention to Europe’s considerations, as we witnessed facilities with regards to importation of oil from Venezuela. He said:” Yet, they are not ready to ignore some of their strategies and to import energy carriers from other countries at any price. In this connection, Iran’s rich energy resources will be an availing opportunity for Europe, which can realize the diversification of their energy suppliers through investment in this industry as well as long term cooperation”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading