Future of Washington-Pyongyang Relations?

2019/01/09 | Economy, Opinion

Strategic Council Online: US-North Korea relations are currently stalled, that is neither a specific movement is being taken on the part of Washington, nor does Pyongyang want to meet the demands of the other side the way they wish. Ismail Bashari - Expert on Korean Peninsula affairs

President Donald Trump first tried to take political advantage of this relationship, that is he displayed a diplomatic gesture, then portrayed his talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un a victory before the world countries and claimed that he has been able to minimize one of the major threats in East Asia. Of course, in his talks with the North Korean leader, Trump had given some promises to the North Korean leader and in response, some steps were taken on the part of Pyongyang. North Korea stopped its missile tests and destroyed some facilities in the hope that the sanctions against his country would be reduced. In the second phase, which is a matter of discussions these days, it has been agreed that the United States end its joint exercises with Japan and South Korea and bring its nuclear presence in South Korea to an end, that is strategic weapons from other parts of the world would not be transferred to the Korean Peninsula and stocked there.

These were the goals the leaders of Washington and Pyongyang had put on the agenda following the Singapore talks. But over the past year, it was North Korea which fulfilled some of its commitments; the United States in return only reduced its war games in South Korea but took no action to ease the sanctions against Pyongyang, saying it would take action after denuclearization of North Korea.

This is while North Korea is not willing to take any action in this regard without getting significant concessions, most notably the disarmament of South Korea of US made tactical nukes.

Another point to be made here relates to the regional moves: Both South Korea and Japan have been trying to improve their relations with North Korea. In particular, South Korea has welcomed the current relationship and détente with its northern neighbour and there have been exchanges of visits by the top officials of the two countries. Therefore, there have been openings in Seoul-Pyongyang relations.

Meantime, the American pressures on China, on the one hand, and on Russia, on the other hand, at the international level, or in other words, the trade war against Beijing or the sanctions against Moscow, have made the two countries more reluctant towards resolving the Korean Peninsula problem, particularly if it is supposed to end in Washington’s favour.

Therefore, the United States has so far failed in persuading North Korea on denuclearization, and the issue is not even followed by South Korean officials so seriously.

Because from Seoul’s final perspective, the unity of the two Koreas is the target even if it occurs by creating a Confederation. Thus, it can be said that the two Koreas are willing to move towards forging unity by preserving the existing systems.

In fact, the South Korean nationalists might be interested to see a united Korea taking shape armed with nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. The analysis that the views of the South Korean President are fully in line with the outlooks of his American counterpart is incorrect.

From forging ties with Pyongyang, South Korea is pursuing its own special relations, but the United States seeks to portray talks with North Korea as a successful policy to the world and benefit from the same approach against Iran and other countries.

For this reason, there is already a type of stagnation in the Pyongyang-Washington talks and North Korea’s denuclearization. Therefore, it can be said that the success that Trump thought had achieved has now become an incomplete and almost ineffective gain. Unless the two parties put new talks on the agenda or the United States takes some practical measures to encourage North Korea to denuclearize. As a result, the question of whether the future of North Korean-US relations, as well as the talks between them, ends in these issues, especially Washington’s economic activity.

Because the sanctions have made life so hard for the people of North Korea, and its dealings with the countries of the world have been very difficult following the US pressures and Security Council resolutions. So Pyongyang seeks to reduce the sanctions so that it can take a breath.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Saudi Hesitation about FTA between PGCC and China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat said about the hesitation of Saudi Arabia to interact with China in the framework of the free trade agreement between China and the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council: This issue does not have just economic or political reasons. The reasons for this delay have changed momentarily due to regional and international developments and are definitely in line with the interests of each of the parties to the agreement.

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Saudi Hesitation about FTA between PGCC and China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat said about the hesitation of Saudi Arabia to interact with China in the framework of the free trade agreement between China and the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council: This issue does not have just economic or political reasons. The reasons for this delay have changed momentarily due to regional and international developments and are definitely in line with the interests of each of the parties to the agreement.

An Analysis of UNGA Resolution for Full Membership of Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that tearing up the UN Charter by the representative of the Israeli regime in response to the resolution on the full membership of Palestine means that the representative of this regime has admitted the end of what is called the state of Israel.

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Loading