Challenges, Obstacles in Implementing TAPI Pipeline Project in Taliban Era

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An analyst of Afghanistan affairs, saying that implementation of the “TAPI” pipeline project will help to develop the legitimacy of the Taliban at the regional and international levels, added: Considering the spread of insecurity caused by ISIS in recent days, as the main rival of the Taliban in Afghanistan, it seems that there is no necessary trust from other players, including Turkmenistan, regarding the operationalization of that project.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Mojtaba Norouzi referred to Afghanistan’s decision to send a delegation to Turkmenistan to negotiate the issues related to the implementation of the “TAPI” pipeline project, including gas prices, as well as the Taliban industrial township and noted: Challenges so far have faced implementation of the TAPI project with a dead end; issues related to the security of investment in Afghanistan and the uncertainty of whether the country’s rulers can guarantee security of the pipeline have been among the most important challenges.
Challenges facing implementation of “TAPI” project
He added: Although such challenge also exists in Pakistan; none of the rulers of Afghanistan have been able to convince other countries that they can provide the security of the pipeline and show that this large investment can lead to sustainable results.
The expert on Afghanistan affairs pointed to the many differences between India and Pakistan and said: TAPI pipeline project will be economically meaningful when it can reach India; but India’s mistrust of Pakistan and Islamabad’s fear of New Delhi due to the consequences of India’s access to cheaper energy and being on the path of further development is among the main challenges of the project, which has kept this project at a standstill until today. This is a major issue in international relations, the management of which is naturally considered beyond the Taliban’s ability.
Norouzi continued: Despite all the slogans raised so far and the repeated talk on its operationalization, the necessary trust has not yet been established between the four parties of the project, and this lack of trust has disrupted the investment process.
Regarding the consequences of the implementation of the project, he noted: What was thought to act as a catalyst for this project to be finally operational was the pressure of external forces. There was this assessment that during the period of the US presence in Afghanistan, due to the policy and grand strategy that it pursues in the region, it will seek to remove the Islamic Republic of Iran from the transit routes of goods and energy and speed up implementation of the project, but at that stage Also, the project was not implemented and the United States could not accelerate it either.
Recalling that the cost of completing the TAPI pipeline project is estimated at 10 billion dollars, the expert added: Now that external powers are not paying attention to this issue, it is more difficult to progress the project than before.
Furthermore, Norouzi addressed the security issues and challenges of Afghanistan and referring to the statements of the Taliban officials who stated that they are looking for the creation of a special security unit with the aim of providing security for the TAPI project, he added: Considering the development of insecurities that have occurred in recent days by “ISIS” as the main rival of the Taliban in Afghanistan, it seems that there is no necessary trust from other players, including Turkmenistan, regarding the operationalization of the project.
Saying that Afghanistan has repeatedly talked about starting construction of the project but its construction has not started yet, he reminded: Basically, first of all, it is important to provide the necessary trust for the ability to create security, and according to the practical measures of the parties, it seems that other main players did not believe some claims.
The analyst of Afghanistan affairs pointed to the Taliban’s attempt to make the implementation of the project conditional on the political recognition of their government and emphasized: The Taliban is not in a position to set conditions for the implementation of the project and do not have the upper hand to set conditions for their recognition. More than other parties, the Taliban needs financial income acquired from implementation of the “TAPI” project.
Pakistan does not have a positive attitude about TAPI
Pointing to the many problems that Pakistan is facing in maintaining security of the TAPI pipeline project, regarding the possibility of cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan to make it operational, Norouzi said: The problem on the Pakistani side has many complications and the TAPI project, under such circumstances, cannot overcome those issues and push the country to work directly and honestly with the Taliban. The factors affecting the decision-making and orientation of implementation of the “TAPI” pipeline for Pakistan are different compared to those for Afghanistan, and this project is not worth much for Pakistan to change its macro strategies for it.
According to the expert on Afghanistan affairs, Pakistan does not have a positive view of extending the project to India, and because of the threats it feels from that point, it is not very willing to cooperate with the Taliban in this field.
Norouzi continued: Before this, the Asian Development Bank had stopped financing the project of transferring Turkmenistan’s gas through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India due to non-recognition of the Taliban. Under the current situation, implementation of the project will definitely help to develop the legitimacy of the Taliban at the regional and international level.
He added: The Taliban want more than anything else to show the conditions in such a way that regional players trust them and their position is so established that countries are willing to implement large projects with long-term joint investments with them. In fact, they tend to gain credit by using such projects.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading