Questioning the Taliban-US Agreement!

2019/09/07 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Whether the Taliban-US agreement will lead to a ceasefire or an understanding with the Afghan central government remains unclear. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi- Expert on Afghanistan

The ninth round of the Taliban-US talks on Afghan peace was held in Doha, Qatar recently, after which negotiations between the Taliban and the US entered a new phase;

Qatar-based broadcaster Al Jazeera said the United States and the Taliban have agreed on formation of an interim government in Afghanistan. It said that the transitional period will be 14 months.

At the current stage, according to the agreement, the Taliban will have a share of power in Afghanistan and will give verifiable assurances that the Taliban will not permit terrorist organizations to maintain a toehold in territory under their control so that the interests of Washington and its allies would not be jeopardized.

The Americans, on the other hand, have accepted that the Taliban be part of the ruling establishment and participate in democratic mechanisms. It should be noted that both the Taliban and the Americans need this agreement because in these circumstances, the Taliban can participate in power and Americans can keep some of their troops at Afghan bases.

In fact, the Taliban and Washington have reached an agreement and now the debate is on the intra-Afghan talks. But whether such an understanding will lead to a ceasefire or an understanding with the Afghan central government is still unclear.

Of course, it seems unlikely that the central government would accept such an understanding and debate on the formation of a provisional government. Unless the Taliban prepares to enter into talks with the central government and the United States helps to hold the next round of talks between the Taliban and the Kabul government. In this case, an intra-Afghan solution may be obtained.

Concerning the interim government, it has long been debated because the tenure of the incumbent government has ended and it is continuing work upon a ruling by the Supreme Court. In other words, inside Afghanistan, some people question the legitimacy of the current government.

On the other hand, although the Taliban-US agreement on the interim government has been released, it is unclear whether a full agreement has been reached or not. The formation of the interim government has been the demand of all groups, and even the presidential candidates have raised the issue. But the question is who will lead the interim government. In fact, the Taliban are seeking to take over the interim government and nominate their own candidate. However, the rest of the political and social groups and even the Karzai government have a different outlook.

So the main issue, namely the formation of an interim government is correct, but what the quality and composition of this government would be is a matter of debate and does not seem to be easily resolved. Another important point in this regard is that the Taliban do not recognize the current government in principle, which is why the election debate has been called into question. So it is now debated whether peace with the Taliban should be a top priority or holding the election?!

The scheduled for the elections, however, is September 6, and there is not much time left. In fact, it is very difficult in the short run to decide whether or not to hold an election. On the other hand, the Afghan government is determined to hold elections under any circumstances and has taken all necessary measures in this regard. So if there is to be an agreement between the United States and the Taliban over a provisional government, this should also be raised in Kabul and the central government, political and social groups and jihadist parties should announce their consent. Otherwise it is not possible for the US and the Taliban alone to carry out such a project by bypassing the Afghan people and government.

Of course, as noted above, the Kabul government’s response to the formation of an interim government without their involvement is undoubtedly negative. Because the Kabul government has already emphasized that the elections be held first and then proceed accordingly. It has voiced opposition to the formation of a transitional government which the central government says is not clear when it would be able to hold the election. Therefore, the central government in Kabul would not accept the idea unless some unexpected events may occur.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading