Winners and Losers of Afghan Loya Jirga

2019/05/15 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: In a general assessment, it can be concluded that Mr. Ashraf Ghani played a successful game by holding the recent Loya Jirga (Grand Assembly) meeting. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi - Subcontinent Affairs Expert

The Loya Jirga meeting on Afghan peace was held from April 9 to May 4. The meeting was attended by 3200 delegates from across Afghanistan by issuing a 23-point resolution and closing address of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani.

However, the Loya Jirga faced several problems; first, within the ruling establishment, the part pertaining to Abdullah Abdullah and the Northern alliance team boycotted the meeting. Meanwhile, political parties and jihadi figures, in addition to the Taliban, boycotted the Loya Jirga. Therefore, the gap created within the establishment was further deepened by holding the Loya Jirga.

From another angle, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai took some action in this meeting, which seems to have succeeded. Because in talks with the Taliban, the Americans had bypassed Mr. Ghani and political groups too had ignored him.

Earlier, in the traditional Loya Jirga, and in critical circumstances, religious scholars, tribal leaders and influential people in the capital city and other regions used to be present and make decisions, but Mr. Ghani breached the tradition and convened a Loya Jirga comprising people who were not considered in political equations. He went to villages, small towns and large cities to find people who were not really important and who contributed a young generation to the Loya Jirga. At the same time, women accounted for 25 to 30 percent of the delegates.

These actions were totally new, and in some way strengthened the argument that Ashraf Ghani is sending this message to his opponents, that he enjoys a good social base among the people. The Afghan president also sent the message to Washington that they could not ignore him, and the Taliban also realized that if they want to achieve peace, they should reach agreement with the Central Government.

Under such circumstances, taking into account the 23 point resolution issued at the end of the Loya Jirga confab in which recommendations were made to the government, the Taliban, the United States and the international community, it can be said that Ashraf Ghani is a complicated actor who has been able to make more picks and make the parties understand that they are not be able to ignore him in the upcoming elections. Therefore, in a general assessment, it can be concluded that Mr. Ashraf Ghani played a successful game by holding the recent Loya Jirga.

Regarding the Taliban vision on Loya Jirga meeting, it should be noted that the group from the outset evaluated it as an illegitimate and propaganda move for Ashraf Ghani and did not accept the results; the Taliban rejected the Loya Jirga requests of the group, including a ceasefire during Ramadan saying that they will continue to fight especially that an article included in the final statement indicated that the statement came from a think tank and was the fruit of the sympathy and consultation of a number of educated and political people.

In this part of the statement, the Taliban have been asked to observe a month-long ceasefire in Ramadan and stop the war and killings. But the Taliban did not accept the demand and said they would continue the jihad. This Taliban response will entail two problems for them: first, against whom will they wage their jihad? Because they do not operate against the American forces and it is the people of Afghanistan and innocent civilians who are killed. Therefore, the Loya Jirga has questioned the very essence of the Taliban jihad. Another point is that during Ramadan which is a holy month in the Islamic World, the Taliban will continue the war and killing while the government’s ceasefire proposal is a wiser move.

Therefore, by raising the issue, Ashraf Ghani has thrown the ball in Taliban court. On the other hand, in the Loya Jirga, it was said that there are different readings of Islam and that religious scholars should set a single reading of Islam. This is very difficult for the Taliban because many religious scholars neither endorse wars during Ramadan nor jihad against Muslims. From their point of view, jihad must be against the infidels. As a result, the Loya Jirga has put the Taliban in a sensitive position by raising these issues, although the Taliban have shown a negative attitude and stated that they will continue to operate not only during Ramadan, but also will intensify the jihad. This stance has brought the Taliban under question ideologically before the public.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Loading