Consequences of Continued Protests for France and Europe

Strategic Council Online - An expert on European developments, referring to the continued protests of the French people against performance of the government of Emmanuel Macron and its effects on the decline of regional and international power in that country, said: Macron will continue to face other waves of dissatisfaction under different excuses and motives.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Morteza Makki referred to the continuation of protests in France which has led to the creation of a security mood in the protests and said: The protests we have been witnessing in recent weeks in France are related to the “Comprehensive Security Law” which has been proposed by the government, approved by the National Assembly, and is being surveyed in the Senate.

Saying that one of the provisions of the Comprehensive Security Law is a ban on publication of images of police forces which is believed to impose limitations on the French media in covering reports and violent approach of the police against the protesters. He noted: As France is said to be a cradle of democracy, holding protest rallies and authorized strikes has become routine and the citizens can take to the streets in protest to a variety of issues and, therefore, ratification of such a law is certainly not favourable for the French citizens.

French Protest Performance of Macron Government

Referring to the serious protests by the syndicates and unions against the French National Assembly approval, the expert on European affairs said: Of course, these protests and strikes are not limited to the said bill; there are other kinds of dissatisfactions and the protests against the Comprehensive Security Law became a spark and an excuse for other French protests against the performance of Emmanuel Macron government.

Makki pointed to the strong presence of various protest groups in the rallies, including the “Yellow Vests”, and added: The main protests of this group are against inequality, injustice, as well as the plans and policies of the Macron government.

He said: In any case, Macron had promised to be able to meet many of the demands of the French people during his term of office, but in more than three years of his administration, not only has his government failed to meet many of the demands of the French people, rather, his government’s policies, along with the consequences of the Coronavirus pandemic, have shrunk the country’s economic growth and also eliminated many employment opportunities, and reduced the purchasing power of the people, especially of the middle and poor classes, to the same extent.

Possibility of Continued Protests against Macron Govt. Policies

Makki stressed: Those economic conditions are not something that could be covered up in France, and in the one-year-plus left from the Macron administration, he would likely face other waves of discontent with different excuses and motivations.

Regarding the consequences of the protests in France’s political position, he said: Those laws are not laws aimed at ensuring equality, justice and freedom of the media, and reactions to those laws will certainly have a profound effect on Emmanuel Macron’s status at the international level, especially in Europe. Macron’s position in France will deal a blow on his position at the EU level.

The expert on European developments further remarked: France is one of the two driving forces of the European Union and plays a key role in the European integration process. Along with Germany, it plays a pivotal and effective role in advancing EU programs. Given that Macron has not been able to establish a strong position for himself within France, he certainly cannot advance many of the convergence and decision-making processes in the EU as well.

The weakening of Macron’s Position and Strengthening of Far-Right

Regarding the effects of the protests and the weakening of Macron’s position in French domestic politics, Makki said: Given the 2018 elections, in which none of the traditional parties, the right, the left and the centre, could win a strong parliamentary majority, certainly if Mr. Macron fails to make specific changes in the political and economic arena of France during the time remaining from his presidency, he could pave the way for the coming to power of Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s far right.

He added: Macron entered the Elysee Palace at a time when we were witnessing a change in many political equations in France. The parties of the left, the right and the centre were marginalized and he was the flag bearer of moderation in France against the National Front led by Ms. Marine Le Pen, but he practically failed to meet many demands of the French voters and we are now witnessing to the popularity of the far-right led by Marine Le Pen.

Makki further elaborated: The traditional right and left currents among the French people have faced the sharpest decline in popularity in the aftermath of the World War II, and the unfavourable record of Mr. Macron’s government could pave the way for the National Front to come to power.

According to the expert on European affairs: Certainly, if the far-right comes to power, we will see a different France as well as a different Europe, because they are leading the process of leaving the EU, the anti-Islamist current and the current that believes in the failure of the coexistence of different cultural and political groups in the French society and the rise of extremist currents can bring about serious changes in the French politics.

He said: This is the most important concern that is widely raised in the French media and political circles as the main consequence of Macron’s inefficiency during his presidency.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading