loader image

US Budget Deficit: Trump’s Achilles Heel!

Strategic Council Online: Donald Trump's general plan is aimed at restoring the US administration’s financial stability in a bid to balance the budget over a 10-year period, but it is unclear how he wants to stabilize the budget without an economic plan to raise taxes and launch fundamental reforms in social security and health care sectors in the long run. Reza Majidzadeh - Economic Researcher

The US Treasury Department reported a 27 percent increase in budget deficit over the first 10 months of this year. This is due to a two-fold increase in government spending on tax revenues; expenditures increased by 8 percent and tax revenues by 3 percent,  including spending on building a border wall between the United States and Mexico. The U.S. fiscal deficit has already exceeded the full-year figure for last year, as spending growth outpaces revenue. While still a modest source of income, tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in the trade war helped almost double customs duties to $57 billion in the period.

The annual budget deficit is expected to exceed $1 trillion starting in 2022, the Congressional Budget Office has said but this is a modest increase compared to the jump in defense and healthcare spending. The US Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the deficit will increase to more than $1 trillion by 2022.

A look at Treasury figures for fiscal year 2018 shows that all budget items, including individual income tax, have increased, with only a corporate tax rate showing a decline of 31% from 2017, part of Trump’s stimulus fiscal policy to expand corporate business and job creation in the United States.

 

US Budget Persistent Deficit

There seems to be persistence among Republican presidents in the United States to inherit a much larger budget deficit than their predecessors, but in the tradition of Democratic presidents like Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, there has been a tendency to reduce the administration deficit. The Republican tax-deduction approach makes it difficult to finance many government spending.

But what policies will Trump adopt about this deficit? Trump’s approach to the budget is outlined in his draft budget for 2020. Trump’s general plan is aimed at restoring the US administration’s financial stability in a bid to balance the budget over a 10 year period, but it is unclear how he wants to stabilize the budget without an economic plan to raise taxes and launch fundamental reforms in social security and health care sectors in the long run.

Trump believes by 2034, the budget deficit will become budget surplus, and over the next decade, government spending will be reduced by $2.7 trillion. Out of this figure $2.1 trillion comes from spending on mandatory programs. But the important point is that only 24% of these spending cuts are implemented over the first five fiscal years of the 10-year budget balancing outlook.

Trump’s policy is based on debt reduction and spending cuts and seeks to reduce the deficit to $ 202 billion by 2029, after reaching a $1.1 trillion deficit in 2021. While over the ten-year horizon, government projects based on public debt-creation will increase by $7.5 trillion. So one of these two policy bases doesn’t seem very solid.

But another important point is that if Trump wins the 2020 election, his proposals, based on budget balancing in the 10-year outlook, will be handed over to another government in the fifth year of this policy vision, and if a democratic government comes to power then it is likely Trump’s ten-year plan would be rejected and this would be another challenge. However, in the proposed plan, spending ceilings will take effect from 2021 and the 2020 US elections have not yet been held. In addition, as for the spending ceiling, Trump has acted on the opposite direction of the 2018 and 2019 budgets, and in past budgets could have eliminated the boundary between defense and non-defense spending and set a single maximum ceiling for all government voluntary spending.

In both previous budgets, each dollar of increase in US defense spending was offset by one-dollar decrease in its military spending. In fact, Trump plans to implement a budget control measure for 2020 that will have a single ceiling for defense and non-defense budgets, and the amount of funds allocated to the defense sector will be $71 billion less than the 2019 US budget. Non-defense spending in the US budget for 2020 is estimated at $543 billion, down from $56 billion on the 2019 budget. But the cuts will be offset by a maximum exemption from US military overseas spending, and Trump is seeking a $156 billion defense budget on contingent overseas spending. However, such an approach may make it difficult to control spending strategy and reduce national debt.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading