Analyzed review on main political issues in the Middle East

2018/10/17 | Opinion, Publications

Strategic Council Online: The Middle East continues to live in a transitional and unstable situation. At the same time, the will of the main regional and some international actors appears to be more focused on resolving the existing crises rather than moving towards creating the new crises.

Mohamadreza Raouf Sheibani[i]

The exceptions are USA, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia continues to pursue the failed policies of “burned land” in her war in Yemen and “excluding Iran” in any regional arrangements. There is a unilateral attempt by the United States in order to change the regional order in favor of Israel.  

The question of Palestine

The question of Palestine, as the main question in the Middle East and the cause of many crises in our region, remains unresolved. Trump’s approach, along with Netanyahu’s irresponsible and harsh positions, has increased frustration among the Palestinians and escalating the situation in the occupied territories. In this context, a new round of uprisings and tensions in Palestine will be the main possibility.  The Trump’s deal of the century on Palestine issue, which was not consulted with anybody, even with her European partners, raised the possibility of further tensions in Palestinian territory.

Possible unrest In Lebanon

In Lebanon, the parliamentary elections were held well and without any security or political problems. The Lebanese are now waiting for a political consensus between the Lebanese groups to form their government.

Certainly, prolonging the process of forming a government in Lebanon provides the conditions for a new phase of unrest. The role of Israel in this regard should not be ignored. Of course, Hezbollah of Lebanon, along with her heavy responsibility in fighting against terrorism inside and outside Lebanon, has shown responsible behavior during the parliamentary elections as well as the current stage in forming the government.  

Stability in Iraq

In Iraq, the process of parliamentary election and the election of the President and the Prime Minister, indicate the relative political stability in the country in the foreseeable future.  It seems that Saudi is going to accept the realities in Iraq and ready to play within the game rules.

Syria, opposition yet interested in Regime Change

In Syria, the process of political settlement took a serious and principled form. The three guarantors of Astana meeting, with the assistance of the United Nations and its Special envoy in Syria, after Tehran summit, are finalizing the necessary tools for beginning the important round of political dialogue between the Syrians. But the start of this political process is still facing obstacles. The approach of the opposition is one of the reasons for the lack of progress. They want what they could not get it on the battlefield to achieve it through influencing the political mechanism and through fundamental changes in the decision-making process. It seems that the opposition and some of their supporters are still following the policy of regime change in Syria, not the reform and sharing in the national government.

Syria’s Facts

Other facts on the Syrian issue;

  • The Syrian military situation is closely linked to three main factors: the situation in Idlib, the Turkish army’s occupation of some Syria territory, and US military occupation policy. In my opinion, if these issues are not resolved, the Syrian crisis will not be resolved.
  • The Turkish approach in Idlib case is an attempt to cause too much concern within European countries.
  • On Turkey-Russia agreement on Idlib, it can be said that this plan does not represent a shift on the political situation in Syria, It is not a turning point, but It will be an appropriate way out, that will prevent Idlib, which has about three million civilians, from the bloody battle.
  • Israel is still trying to change the title of the crisis from the Syrian crisis to a regional one. The Iranian presence in Syria is a legitimate presence and Iran will remain in Syria as needed. It is not in the interest of stability and calm in Syria that the issue of Iranian forces becomes a controversial issue. It is better to be the concern of occupying forces in Syria and its future consequences.
  • In this regard, Iran is unlikely to think to establish a military base in Syria. The strengthening and equipping of the Syrian army is Iran’s strategic objective, which is in contrast with Israel’s military strategy vis-à-vis the army of its neighbors.
  • An Israeli strategic fault in a Russian plane crash leads to the deployment of the S-300 strategic missiles as one of the consequences of this event, which changed the military balance of the region at the expense of Europe.

[i] Senior fellow of IPIS

Ex-ambassador of Iran to Syria

Ex-Deputy minister on Arabian affairs

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading