The Necessity of Shaping Technology Diplomacy in a Data-Driven Global Order

Strategic Council Online-Interview: An international technology expert said, "While the world is moving towards the bipolarization of cyberspace and digital separation, Iran is inevitably compelled to establish its independent position in the new data-driven order by redefining technology diplomacy."

Iran’s Digital Diplomacy in the Face of Global Digital Divergence
Mehran Sharifi, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, stated: “Recent developments indicate that the global digital order is on a path of divergence; such that what was known as the global internet up to a decade ago is now dividing into several technological and political domains.” Referring to a concept termed the “Digital Iron Curtain” by the Atlantic Council think tank, the expert said: “The world’s move away from a free internet is not merely due to the security policies of Russia or China, but is the result of geopolitical competition among major powers over data, cyber control, and technological influence; meaning, in the world of data, we are also witnessing an East-West bloc formation.”
The researcher emphasized: “In such an environment, Iran must shape its digital diplomacy considering foreign policy considerations, technological independence, and multilateral cooperation within the Global South.” He added: “In a world where the U.S. and its allies seek dominance over the data chain, cloud infrastructure, and artificial intelligence, one cannot remain solely reliant on a consumer-centric approach; just as one should not unilaterally rely on the data world of Russia and China either. In this context, while maintaining independence alongside other countries, Iran must have an active share in redefining the rules of the global digital order.”

Security and Technological Challenges in the Era of “Digital Separation”
Sharifi further clarified: “The new digital divide is, in fact, a technological schism that simultaneously encompasses security, economic, and political dimensions.” He explained: “Technology is no longer just a tool for development; it has become a tool for pressure, influence, and even deterrence; and this is precisely where technology diplomacy intertwines with national security.”
He noted: “In research reports from the Hoover Institution and other Western entities, China’s ‘Digital Silk Road’ is referred to as an effort to form a technology bloc independent of the West.” Sharifi said: “By investing in intercontinental cables, 5G networks, and indigenous positioning systems, China is creating a chain of non-Western digital connectivity. Iran can achieve multilateral technological links through a similar approach, tailored to its own capacities, via regional cooperation within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization or BRICS.”
The expert believes: “Sanction pressures and restrictions on access to Western technologies, although challenging, also present an opportunity to review the country’s digital policies; because sanctions have caused Iran to shift its focus from dependence on exclusive Western platforms towards the indigenization of cloud services, cybersecurity infrastructures, and independent networks.” The international technology analyst considers “Iran’s major challenge in the era of digital separation not to be merely technology, but smart regulation and shaping international cyber relations.” He emphasized: “In the new space, any country that can harmonize its data interaction rules and digital sovereignty with non-Western partners will be in a better position to maintain technological independence.”

Shaping a South-Centric Technology Diplomacy
Sharifi stated: “The effective strategy in facing the global digital divide is neither isolation nor submission, but active participation in Global South structures.” He added: “Many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America face limitations similar to Iran’s. These countries desire the establishment of a fairer system in the digital space where data and infrastructure do not become tools of domination.”
According to the expert, “Iran should pursue its technology diplomacy along three axes: First, developing independent communication infrastructures and indigenous data centers to reduce dependence on Western routes; second, participating in joint projects on cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and cryptocurrencies within the framework of BRICS Plus and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization; and third, creating links between universities, startups, and formal diplomacy to strengthen and transfer technology and train specialized human resources.”
Sharifi stated: “In the new world, digital power is national power; a country that fails to demonstrate its own identity, sovereignty, and ability to create technology in cyberspace will become a second-rate actor in the field of diplomacy as well.” Sharifi concluded with a warning: “If countries act without a plan in the face of the bipolarization trend in cyberspace, the world will face a version of a digital Cold War; a battle this time not over land, but over data, artificial intelligence, and the human mind.”

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

An Analysis of Europe’s Approach Towards Iran

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sanctions imposed by the European Union against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the activation of the snapback mechanism represent an effort to exert additional political and economic pressure on our country to change the system’s behavior regarding regional developments.

The Outlook for Ukraine Peace Negotiations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After nearly four years of conflict, the outlook for Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations remains unclear; not due to a lack of initiatives, but because of deep conflicts of interest, Russia’s strategy of exploiting the battlefield situation politically, and European confusion and lack of consensus. Achieving a lasting peace seems out of reach.

Review of the 2026 budget of the Zionist regime

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: It appears that the primary focus of the 2026 budget of the Israeli regime is on simultaneously managing war pressures, social discontent, and political ambiguities; even if this approach leads to the postponement of structural reforms and increases financial risks in the medium-term horizon.

The Implications of the United States’ New National Security Strategy on Global Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS 2025) is not merely a revision of Washington’s foreign policy, but an official declaration redefining its interests, sphere of influence, and the framework of international relations. This change could shake the foundations of the post-Cold War order and place Europe and NATO in a difficult position.

The goals of the Israeli regime in its military attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asian affairs expert said: One of the main objectives of the recent attacks by the Israeli regime on Syria is to prevent the establishment of a strong central authority or government in Syria. Therefore, it is trying to prevent the comprehensive rule of the new government under the name of Ahmad al-Sharaa or al-Julani by attacking and invading southern Syria and various regions of the country, even Damascus.

China’s Strategy to Become a Global Military Power

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With its large arsenal of hypersonic missiles, advanced cyber capabilities, extensive satellite network, and survivable nuclear triad, China has become a serious competitor to the United States. Nevertheless, in strategic documents, including the 2025 National Security Document, China describes itself as a development-oriented power committed to the international order, whose path to rise does not pass through war.

Loading