Comparative Study of Taliban’s Dominant Model for Governance

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A professor at the University of Religions and Denominations said that the “Islamic Emirate” of the Taliban means non-interference of the people and other groups and parties in politics and social affairs, adding: It seems that in the future, apart from pressuring the Afghan people to implement what they call Islamic law, we will be witness to almost no significant difference between the Taliban government and the governance models in some Sunni religion countries.

Hojatoleslam Dr. Mahdi Farmanian, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, stated: The closest model of government to the model of the “Islamic Emirate” of the Taliban will be the government of Saudi Arabia during the reign of “Abdul Aziz” between 1900 up to 1953.

Saudi Arabia’s past governance, a model for Taliban rule

Saying that sons of Abdul Aziz chose more secularist approaches in administering  the government and cope with some issues with tolerance, he added: It seems that in the model of the “Islamic Emirate”, we will be witness to the presence of a head of government without holding elections and paying attention to the principles of democracy. The people must pledge allegiance to the head, and the opposition will be treated with violence. Of course, the Taliban seek to enforce Sharia in Afghanistan; while Sharia is not enforced in many cases in Saudi Arabia due to the approach of the rulers.

Stating that the Islamic Emirate means that people and other groups and parties do not interfere in politics and social affairs, the university professor continued: The Taliban, along with the head of government, will have a leadership council called the “Council of settelment”, which will be formed to consult with the head on any issues he deem necessary, and members of the council will be elected by the same head.

While explaining the differences between Saudi Wahhabism with the Taliban, Farmanian stated: The origin of the Taliban’s thoughts goes back to the Sunni currents of the subcontinent, and in particular to the Deobandi school of thought; because most of the Taliban and its leaders are educated in Deobandi schools. Meanwhile, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam played a key role in supporting Afghanistan’s Sunni jihadist forces and the Taliban mobilization, to the extent that even the draft of the Taliban constitution has been prepared by that group. Of course, due to the diverse range of opinions in Deobandi schools and consequently the Taliban, their school of thought is the school of “contradictory dualities”.

The difference between the Caliphate and the Emirate

Explaining that the model of the “Islamic Emirate” is not seriously different from the “Islamic Caliphate” in terms of governmental characteristics, Farmanian said: In the view of the Sunnis, the “Caliphate” has characteristics; the Ottoman Empire would not introduce its government as a “caliphate” either, because in this view, one of the prevailing conditions is that it must be “Qurayshi”; but after that empire became powerful, there were justifications that, for example, if the ruler is not a Qurayshi, the position of the caliphate can be considered for him. It seems that the Taliban will take the same approach in the future.

Referring to the demarcations between countries and the efforts for nation-building in accordance with those demarcations, he continued: Mohammad Rashid Reza, the religious thinker and political activist in Egypt and Syria in the late Ottoman period, stated for the first time in his book that ‘we cannot establish an Islamic Caliphate because of the situation we are witnessing in the Islamic world; instead, we must seek to establish an “Islamic state” within a specific geographical area’.

The researcher of Islamic currents, sects and religions said: The Muslim Brotherhood also sought to establish an Islamic government in a specific geographical area, but they eventually accepted the elections and tried to dominate over the government through it; but the Taliban do not believe in such a way, and if they come to power, in the coming years they will move towards the appointment of a Qurayshi as leader and will talk about the Islamic Caliphate.

He reminded: Of course, the Taliban did not have a positive view of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt; to the extent that during the Taliban rule, their books were banned from entering into Afghanistan. Such an approach stems from the past fatwas of the scholars of India, Sindh and Pakistan, and of course the positions of the Brotherhood populations against such view have further intensified those differences.

Saying that we will not see a significant difference between the Taliban government and the Arab governance models in some Sunni countries, Farmanian said: The only difference we may see will be stricter attitude towards the people with regard to what they call implementation of the Sharia; especially since such approach towards women is quite noticeable.

Foreign policy in the Islamic Emirate

The associate professor of the University of Religions and Denominations said that in this period of Taliban rule, we will be witness to coordination between the United States and the Taliban, adding: In the new era, the Taliban will drastically change their approach to the international community and connect with all countries in the region and the world; as in the past, they will not show anti-American attitudes and probably will only not recognize Israel; but there will be no official or serious threat or opposition to it. On the other hand, as we see in Turkey at the time of Mr. Erdogan, sometimes they will only take a stand on some of the atrocities committed against Muslims and will change their style and method under the influence of time.

At the same time, he stressed: Due to various historical issues and different ideological bases between the Taliban and Wahhabism, there will be no serious alliance between Saudi Arabia and the Taliban. The Taliban will interact with Saudi Arabia and have relations with it like any other country, and while they will not speak out against it, they will not form a serious alliance against other countries.

Farmanian said: Afghanistan’s geographical location is as such that it does not have access to the sea, and for this reason it is necessary to meet its needs from the Pakistan or Iran. The Taliban will certainly pay attention to such issues in the new era, given its experience.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implicit Decree “Preventing Attack on Rafah” – ICJ Decision in South Africa vs. Israel Lawsuit

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: On February 12, the South African government once again appealed to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) to demand the indication of new measures in light of statements made by the Israeli prime minister’s office on the necessity of a military incursion into the Rafah region in the Gaza Strip and in light of subsequent operations conducted thereafter.

How to Make the Most of the Provisional Order of the International Court of Justice

Strategic Council Online – Note: The recent provisional order indicated by the International Court of Justice on the “Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) – if used astutely – could constitute a “turning point” in the struggle of civil advocates and governments committed to the Palestinian cause. Before this decision, two other significant legal instruments had been produced at the highest levels of the United Nations concerning Israel, but unfortunately – despite their remarkable potential – neither was adequately exploited by pro-Palestine governments – including the “Palestinian Authority” – due to lassitude in some instances, unwarranted prudence in others, or even the fear that engaging the Israeli regime in any manner on a formal stage could wrongly be construed as its “recognition.”
Reza Nasri – International Jurist

Predictable Scenarios in US Elections and Iran’s Approach

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: While the Gaza crisis and Israel’s inhuman behavior in dealing with the people of the Strip cast a shadow over all international issues and has become the biggest challenge facing the world community, the type and nature of America’s relationship with the Israeli regime and the impact of its actions on the global level and in different regions have also made the upcoming US elections a key and important issue in 2024.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – university professor

An Analysis of Recent Saudi Statement about Normalization of Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East affairs says Saudi Arabia’s recent statement stands for two issues, which indicates Riyadh’s compliance with US policies. The first issue is that Saudi Arabia has supported the two-state plan with Washington’s backing. In contrast, the Palestinians and Resistance Axis countries have strong reservations about the two-state scheme.

France and the European Union seek to challenge Russia’s role in the South Caucasus

Strategic Council Online—Interview: The former ambassador of Iran to the Republic of Azerbaijan said that the positions of the European Union’s foreign policy in support of Armenia and opposition to the Republic of Azerbaijan are in the context of challenging Russia’s role in the developments in the South Caucasus and also in the continuation of Europe’s conflict with Russia over Ukraine.

Changing the Political Scene of the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online: An expert on European issues said: The war of attrition in Ukraine has caused Russia and the supporters of Ukraine to sharpen their tone towards each other in the political arena. to show that they are still determined to advance their goals in the war.

Loading