India’s Strategy on Central Asian Countries

2022/02/22 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert of Asian affairs considered the virtual Summit Meeting of five Central Asian countries on Afghanistan in line with New Big Game of hegemon powers of the region and said:” new relations between Russia and India is kind of deal for broad presence of New Delhi in the Asia’s Heartland in order to make a balance versus China.

Having stated that after the virtual Meeting of China with the leaders of Central Asian countries, India also joined the initiative and for the first time held a Summit Meeting with the heads of states of five Central Asian countries, Behrouz Ayaz in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations noted then:” the main topics raised in the virtual meeting were trade cooperation, post-Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, fighting terrorism as well as extremism in the region”.

He added:” in the Meeting, India emphasized on development of Chabahar Port for deepening of its economic relations with five Central Asian countries, which by itself can indirectly be considered as a reaction to China’s investment in Gwadar Port of Pakistan. Yet, with a more profound study of reasons and consequences of the Meeting, one can say geopolitical factors as well as strategic motivations of hegemon powers of the region were among the main impetuses of the Meeting”.

Having reminded that the virtual meeting underscored the economics as an important factor, in a way that they agreed to set up Trade Council of India and Central Asia, the expert of Asian affairs said:” during 2020 until 2021 the total export of India to Central Asia amounted to $ 658 million, while its imports from the same region during the same period stood at $ 826 million. In this connection, New Delhi provided an agreement amounted to $ 1 billion to the five Central Asian countries to cover different projects on information technology, agriculture, health and education”.

In the meantime, Ayaz emphasized:” Having looked at the issue from a different angle, it can be said that the Meeting had a political and security nature. The recent developments that caused Taliban takeover, made New Delhi as a loser and Islamabad as a winner of a political game in Afghanistan. In the past few years, India was not only trying to expand its investments in Afghanistan but also considered the country as a linking bridge to connect to the Central Asian markets”.

He continued:” Taliban’s repeated domination over the country and concerns about the new wave of extremism in the Central Asia made Central Asian countries and India to take more serious steps to strengthen their relations. Three countries of Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have common borders with Afghanistan which has exposed them to the security concerns about the other side of the border. Thus, the security related border cooperation may drive them to conclude defense agreements with India”.

The expert of Asian affairs spelled out:” with an overwhelming look at the developments of Asia continent, it should be said that the recent Meeting has been taken place in line with New Big Game of hegemon powers of the region”.

He explained:” China is an emerging power at global level that dreams of becoming a global hegemon. This has been encountered with the U.S. preventive measures at global level, and with Indian and even Russian deterrent measures at regional level. In view of the declared strategies of the past, Indo – Pacific strategy raised by Shinzo Abe, the then Japan’s Prime Minister, and Open and Free Indo – Pacific strategy that was raised by Trump Administration can be considered to control China at regional and global levels”.

According to Ayaz; Indian measures in geopolitical region of Indo – Pacific as well as geographical region of Central Asian can be analyzed in competition with China”.

Having stated that the Central Asia has sensitive strategic position and high economic importance that drew the attention of two powerful players of Asia, i.e. China and Russia for years, the analyst of Asian affairs said:” with a historic impression to the region as the legacy of Cold War era, Moscow casts a security look at its back yard. While, Beijing casts an economic look in line with One Belt, One Road plan and pays attention to the importation of energy to the region”.

He added:” within the past several years, and in order to promote economic relations, and in fact for its strategic relations, India has also pinned its eyes to this region. The U.S. departure from the region last year from one hand, and competition between Beijing and Moscow from the other hand made Russia to once again tries to expand its relations with India. The recent visit of Mr. Putin, the Russian President to New Delhi on December 5, 2021 can be assessed in line with this goal and to create a balance versus the expansion of China’s influence in Eurasia”.

Ayaz continued:” it seems that new relations between Russia and India is a kind of a deal for broad presence of New Delhi in the Heartland region or the Heartland of Asia to create balance versus China; therefore, competition between China and India in Shanghai Cooperation Organization for regional superiority has shown itself this time on the global chess board. Beijing is after ambitious strategy of Silk Road and New Delhi is after Extended Neighborhood strategy to be linked with Central Asia and to compete with China”.

He stressed:” holding the New Delhi virtual Meeting at Summit level with Central Asian countries only two days after China Summit Meeting with these countries and the proposal of $ 1 billion aid to these countries versus the $ 500 million of Chinese aid extended to them can be assessed in line with this; therefore, India as a new player has joined the New Big Game on Global Chess Board”.

Ayaz referred to the competitions and challenges between India and Pakistan, particularly with respect to Afghanistan and said:” In order to prevent the repeated influence of India in Kabul, Pakistan hinders the arrival of humanitarian aids to Afghanistan. Expansion of New Delhi relations with Muslim countries of Central Asia and its preparedness to develop and invest in Chabahar Port that in a way is considered as a competitor to Gwadar Port of Pakistan will lead to negative reaction of Islamabad”.

The analyst of Asian issues said:” Although the hostile relations of the country with Islamabad continues to overshadow between them, but in the meantime it is not a decisive factor in the present strategies of New Delhi; because New Delhi has recently set the pawns of its chess board against China not Pakistan”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading