UAE Dual Policy versus Iran

2021/12/26 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An expert of the Middle East affairs commented on the recent efforts made by UAE to preserve its relations with Washington and simultaneous expansion of ties with Tehran and Tel Aviv and said:” UAE tries to use its relations with Iran as a leverage in line with its interests with Israeli regime and the U.S. and employs its relations with Tel Aviv and Washington as a leverage versus Iran in order to keep all parties.

Ghaasem Mohebali in an interview with the site of Strategic Council Online stated:” UAE is looking for a kind of relations in its foreign policy based on which it can establish relations with all countries in the Middle East in accordance with its interests and demands”.

Having stated that UAE as a military ally of the U.S. Mohabeali said:” Abu Dhabi has recently expanded its relations with Tel Aviv too and has entered into major treaties with the Zionist regime.

Having referred to the point that Iran is a neighbor to UAE, the expert said:” from one hand UAE intends to use the U.S. and Israeli regime to the benefit of its relations with Iran and proceed with its demands and policies versus Tehran or as they believe to remove Iran’s threat, and from the other hand it seeks to employ trade potentials with Iran in order to use Tehran as an scapegoat versus the U.S. and Israel and to deal with both sides”.

According to the expert, at the moment Abu Dhabi policy is to take the maximum benefit from the gaps that exist between Iran and the West. Because they feel Iran needs its relations with UAE. The U.S. and the Zionist regime also intend to exploit Abu Dhabi capacity and to establish a unified front against Iran in collaboration with South Persian Gulf countries.

Having replied to the question about the impediments before the advancement of the UAE policies, Mohebali said:” UAE raises from one hand a number of baseless claims on Abu Musa Island, and from the other hand following the Arab Spring, the regional policies of the country in Yemen, Egypt and Libya caused it to be in competition with some of the regional countries like Qatar, Turkey and to some extent Saudi Arabia”,

Having stated that one of the UAE concerns has always been the issue of Muslim Brotherhood in Arab world, he said:” In this connection, UAE along with Saudi Arabia have always been in competition with Turkey and Qatar in Libya and Egypt; Qatar and Turkey have extended their support to Muslim Brotherhood and UAE and Saudi Arabia were the supporters of military personnel in Egypt and Libya”.

According to the expert, despite being a neighbor to Iran, UAE has raised a number of claims against three islands particularly Abu Musa and intends to take concession from Iran through expanding her relations with the Zionist regime and the U.S. In the meantime, it needs the trade relations with Iran too”.

Mohebli underscored:” Iran is an important trade partners of UAE in the region and Abu Dhabi does not want to miss this opportunity.

The expert of the Middle East affairs mentioned that having a secure region is in line with the interests of all Persian Gulf countries, particularly UAE. He said:” these countries neither have the capability to enter into a clash alone nor it serves their interests, but in some cases like Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, these countries attempt to involve greater powers in the region aiming at removing threat”.

In connection with the looking of the Southern Persian Gulf littoral countries, particularly UAE versus Iran, Mohebali continued to explain:” While these countries avoid direct confrontation with Iran but they intend to use the U.S. and Israeli regime and to place them versus Iran”.

According to the expert, some of Arab countries set the stage for a dual game, i.e. when the region is heading towards a crisis they try to show a green light to Iran from one hand and to preserve their strategic relations with the U.S. and Israeli regime from the other hand.

The expert of the Middle East affairs commented on the background of UAE policies against Iran and said:” the country has practiced a policy in accordance with the regional situation during the 40 plus years after the Islamic Revolution of Iran based on the strategy to contain and control Iran and in the meantime played a winks and nods game with Tehran”.

He continued:” UAE set the relations in accordance with the situation, i.e. if the relations of Tehran with the U.S. and Europe improve, they will also try not to stay behind the trend and when the relations between Iran and greater powers like European countries or the U.S. suffer from a problems, they also try to preserve their relations with Iran but go along and accompany with the Western powers. This strategy adopted by the UAE has always remained unchanged during post-Islamic Revolution of Iran”.

Mohebali referred to some measures taken by Emiratis and said these movements are considered as giving false assurance to Iran and the example of which is the recent visit of Security Advisor of UAE to Iran.

The expert continued:” As Abu Dhabi had planned the visit of the prime minister of Israeli regime and concluding high level contracts and whereas Iran’s declared policy is to improve relations with Southern Persian Gulf littoral countries, they tried to show the gesture as if they are improving their relations with Tehran”.

He emphasized:” in fact, Abu Dhabi tried to moderate Tehran’s further reaction in case of expansion of UAE – Zionist regime relations and dragging the regime into the region that can be a reaction along with a threat”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading