Strategic Consequences of Ansarullah Field Advances in Ma’rib

2021/12/04 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A West Asian affairs analyst says that it is very difficult and impossible for the Saudis to accept a political dialogue in the current situation and that there will be no solution to start political talks or clarify the situation in the Yemeni war until Ma'rib is liberated. He said: Ansarullah is determined to liberate Ma'rib and we will see this happen in the future.

Speaking to the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Reza Mirabian said that despite all the efforts of the Saudi coalition to reduce the pressure on the Ma’rib front, the Yemeni army and the People’s Committees continued their progress at the southern gate of Ma’rib. He noted that Ma’rib has become a battleground between Yemeni forces and Saudi-affiliated militias; because of the abundance of energy resources and its role in providing energy to different regions of Yemen, this province is of strategic importance.

He added: “The forces affiliated with Mansour Hadi, the resigned president, have suffered heavy defeats in recent days and have lost many of their positions in East and Central Al-Belkin.”

 

Ansarullah’s determination to liberate Ma’rib

Mirabian added: “The rapid developments in Yemen and Ansarullah’s upper hand in the war show that there is nothing left until the official defeat of Saudi Arabia in Ma’rib, and it seems that given the current situation, Ansarullah is determined to liberate Ma’rib and we will see this happen in the future.” The liberation of Ma’rib will give Ansarullah a better position in the political negotiations.

Referring to several rounds of direct and indirect political talks between Ansarullah and Saudi Arabia, the West Asian affairs expert said: “Ansarullah has never rejected the political solution package; however, they set five conditions for the conclusion of the political negotiations, which in the current situation have given priority to two conditions: “lifting the siege of Yemen” and “stopping the aggression.” However, the Saudis have not accepted these conditions.

Referring to the remarks made by the foreign minister of the National Salvation Government to the effect that the Saudis must open Sanaa airport and ports as signs of ceasefire in order to achieve a just peace,” Mirabian said: “The Saudis want political negotiations while continuing their attacks and siege.” But Ansarullah rejects such conditions, emphasizing that this would put them in a position of weakness.

According to the expert on West Asian affairs, now that the situation on the battlefield in Ma’rib has become extremely critical and the province is on the verge of collapse, and on the other hand, we hear reports on the withdrawal of government forces and the possibility of other withdrawals in the future, these issues are addressed again.

Referring to a report in the British Wall Street Journal that Washington had rejected a Saudi request for intelligence and military support to target positions used by Yemeni Ansarullah to attack targets deep inside Saudi territory, he said: “In the current situation US pressure on the Saudis are increasing and Washington believes that Riyadh must accept a political solution with minimal damage. Of course, the Saudis have not accepted this so far, and political negotiations will reach nowhere until they accept these facts.

Mirabian pointing to Ansarullah’s talks with the tribes of the southern provinces of Yemen and the possibility of reaching an agreement with them, said: “Ansarullah, while not closing the door to reach a political solution with Saudi Arabia, also has the upper hand in the field and military advances.” We also see deterrence and attacks deep into Saudi Arabia. In this situation, neither the puppet government forces controlled by Riyadh nor the Emirati and Saudi forces are able to confront Ansarullah.

Stressing that it is very difficult and impossible for the Saudis to accept a political dialogue in these circumstances, he added: “It seems that there will be no solution to start political negotiations or clarify the situation in the Yemeni war until the liberation of Ma’rib.” Ansarullah has also officially announced that, whether negotiations take place or not, they will not negotiate until Ma’rib is liberated. Of course, given the situation on the ground and the political developments in Yemen, it is not possible to predict a specific time for the liberation of Ma’rib, and the war will continue in the short term.

Mirabian, meanwhile, said that the Western media had also acknowledged in recent days that Riyadh was reconsidering its strategy in Yemen. Satellite imagery has also shown that Saudi Arabia is reducing its military presence in Yemen in order to strengthen the protection of its borders, and this decision seems to have been made in anticipation of the dominance of Ansarullah forces over Ma’rib.

 

American awareness of Saudi weakness

Referring to US military, arms and political support for Saudi Arabia in the Yemeni war, he continued: “US support for Saudi Arabia is now more limited than before.” The Americans are pressuring Saudi Arabia to end the war quickly; because they also know that the future losses will be more for Saudi Arabia.

Mirabian said: “The United States has warned Saudi Arabia in various ways that the continuation of the war will lead to the closure of the doors of a peaceful return of Saudi Arabia from Yemen.” Therefore, the Saudis must leave the war in Yemen with the least damage. Given the developments of the past six years, the Americans know that Saudi Arabia is incapable of confronting Ansarullah.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading