loader image

Necessity of Global Stand against U.S. Sanctions

2021/10/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Interview: Having pointed out the recent statement issued by thirty countries including Iran, China, Russia, Palestine, Belarus, Pakistan, Egypt, Venezuela and Bolivia on condemning to resort the coercive unilateral measures such as sanctions against developing countries, an expert on the U.S. said:” It is obvious that when the U.S. pressurizes countries under the pretext of sanctions, those countries try to both minimize their dependence on the U.S. economy and maximize their capacities to boost their cooperation with other countries subjected to similar sanctions”.

Amir Ali Abolfath in an interview with the site of Strategic Council on Foreign Relations pointed out the possibility of formation of a club among those sanction-fighting countries in future continued:” however, the club containing those countries subjected to sanctions has not been formed”.

He stressed:” In fact, it can be said that perhaps an unwritten agreement among these countries is being formed based on mutual necessities”.

The expert explained:” when a country suffers from difficulties to use the U.S. dollar or international banking system like SWIFT, then she approaches other countries that can provide new capacities for her. Using national currencies, or currencies other than U.S. dollar and euro, clearing or barter deals, joint venture in countries pressurized under sanctions, and formation of regional blocs are among measures that countries like Iran, being under sanction regime, can put in their agenda”.

Having stressed on the point that Americans have dauntlessly extended their sanctions within the past decades, he added:” the sanctions were addressing the U.S. enemies and rivals at the outset. But today, even the U.S. allies are pressurized by sanctions. In a way, it can be said that the U.S. is strongly addicted to imposing sanction and sanction policy. Now, tens of countries, a large number of companies, a long list of real and legal entities throughout the world are enlisted in the U.S. sanctions”.

According to Abolfath, the more extensive the sanctions, the stronger become the anti-sanctions cooperation.

He continued:” There was a time when only three or four countries were subjected to sanctions and unable to do something collectively. But now, there is a range of countries and companies that are enlisted in sanctions and can find each other and try their best to promote capacities to meet their mutual requirements”.

On the future of such anti-sanction policies, he explained:” It seems that such cooperation and policies will be strengthened in future, because the U.S. does neither plan to put aside her sanction policy nor loosens the severity of her policies. That’s why reciprocity against such U.S. policy is to strengthen the cooperation among those countries and foundations any of which are somehow subjected to sanctions due to a reason. Moreover, the necessity requires that these countries and foundations will take step towards cooperation with each other”.

Having ultimately pointed out that Iran as one of the countries that is subjected to the severest sanction regimes of the U.S., Abolfath said:” This very point requires Iran to head towards cooperation with other sanctioned countries in order to meet their mutual needs, because diplomacy needs economic background and it is a must for Iran to dynamic her economy”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Ansarollah’s Effective “Balancing” in Al-Aqsa Battle

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Al-Aqsa Storm was a response to the crimes committed by the Zionist regime against the Palestinian nation, which caused irreparable damage to that regime.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert in regional affairs

An analysis of former French ambassadors’ criticism of Macron’s approach to Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Interview: Referring to the publication of a letter by several French ex-ambassadors regarding the developments in Gaza in Le Monde newspaper, the former ambassador of Iran to France stated that the positions of France in the Gaza war and the events that have affected the diplomacy of this country since the beginning of the conflicts have caused reactions in the French diplomatic circles. He added that it is noteworthy that the French ambassadors considered the destruction of Hamas to be an illusion and that these different positions have become a little more public.

Russia-Armenia Divergence on the Rise

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A university professor said that the nationalist movements in Armenia believe that Moscow’s measures not only have no benefit for them but have also imposed some costs; and added that in a situation where Russia, which is currently involved in Ukraine, acting in its interests, Armenia has decided that it would be more beneficial to closely cooperate with the international community while pursuing its interests.

US interests and goals in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: During the past few days, the Gaza Strip witnessed a temporary ceasefire for the mutual release of Zionist and Palestinian prisoners and limited aid to Gaza. The ceasefire was finally implemented not because of respect for the UN General Assembly vote or the Security Council resolution but because of political negotiations, the mediation of Qatar, and the United States’s green light.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Vague Prospect of China-US Summit Agreements

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A faculty member of the Institute of Strategic Studies said that it should be seen whether the Chinese will violate the agreement to re-establish military relations with the United States due to Biden’s calling Xi Jinping a dictator, added: If once again they conclude that establishment of relations between the military forces of the two countries should be delayed, it shows that the recent meeting between the two presidents has not been successful.

Internal Differences in Zionist Regime’s Cabinet over Gaza War, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Field and political estimates show that elements in the Zionist regime’s cabinet are seeking a “war of attrition” in Gaza. Because the end of this war will be the “starting point” of the escalation of problems in the Occupied Territories, especially against the cabinet and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Ansarollah’s Effective “Balancing” in Al-Aqsa Battle

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Al-Aqsa Storm was a response to the crimes committed by the Zionist regime against the Palestinian nation, which caused irreparable damage to that regime.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert in regional affairs

An analysis of former French ambassadors’ criticism of Macron’s approach to Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Interview: Referring to the publication of a letter by several French ex-ambassadors regarding the developments in Gaza in Le Monde newspaper, the former ambassador of Iran to France stated that the positions of France in the Gaza war and the events that have affected the diplomacy of this country since the beginning of the conflicts have caused reactions in the French diplomatic circles. He added that it is noteworthy that the French ambassadors considered the destruction of Hamas to be an illusion and that these different positions have become a little more public.

Russia-Armenia Divergence on the Rise

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A university professor said that the nationalist movements in Armenia believe that Moscow’s measures not only have no benefit for them but have also imposed some costs; and added that in a situation where Russia, which is currently involved in Ukraine, acting in its interests, Armenia has decided that it would be more beneficial to closely cooperate with the international community while pursuing its interests.

US interests and goals in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: During the past few days, the Gaza Strip witnessed a temporary ceasefire for the mutual release of Zionist and Palestinian prisoners and limited aid to Gaza. The ceasefire was finally implemented not because of respect for the UN General Assembly vote or the Security Council resolution but because of political negotiations, the mediation of Qatar, and the United States’s green light.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Vague Prospect of China-US Summit Agreements

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A faculty member of the Institute of Strategic Studies said that it should be seen whether the Chinese will violate the agreement to re-establish military relations with the United States due to Biden’s calling Xi Jinping a dictator, added: If once again they conclude that establishment of relations between the military forces of the two countries should be delayed, it shows that the recent meeting between the two presidents has not been successful.

Internal Differences in Zionist Regime’s Cabinet over Gaza War, Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Field and political estimates show that elements in the Zionist regime’s cabinet are seeking a “war of attrition” in Gaza. Because the end of this war will be the “starting point” of the escalation of problems in the Occupied Territories, especially against the cabinet and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional affairs

Loading