Strategic Importance of Rapprochement between Iran & Saudi Arabia

2021/10/06 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Opinion: Iran and Saudi Arabia have experienced tossing relations within the past few decades, which ultimately led to severance of relations in 2016 and heightening tensions in their relations. Hamid Khoshayand, Analyst, International Affairs

Although relations between the two countries have been convulsive within the past 5 years but during the past few months and after the commencement of direct talks in Baghdad, initiated by Iraqi government, they have entered into a new détente phase.

An over-view of the developments of the past few years and current implications clearly show that Saudi court has played a principal and effective role in fanning crisis of bilateral relations. This is the case while the Islamic Republic of Iran has always expressed her readiness to sort out existing tensions.

Even martyr Soleimani made efforts to improve the relations between the two countries before his martyrdom during the last months of his life. Saudi Arabia was the main agenda of the last foreign trip of martyr Soleimani to Iraq aimed at sorting out disputes between the two countries, which was suspended with the assassination of the honorable Soleimani who was martyred by the U.S.

A high wall of distrust and hostility that cast its shadow within the past years due to different political, security and diplomatic reasons has provided ample grounds and opportunities for some external players such as the Zionist regime and the U.S. to proceed with their political, economic, security and military benefits.

Signing of several hundred billions of dollar worth contracts of weapons purchase from the U.S., militarization of Riyadh foreign policy, weakening of Saudi Arabia’s national security, spread of terrorism and extremism in the region, continuation of Yemen war, widening of religious-ethnical and inter-faiths-political gaps at regional level and in the world of Islam and intensification of regional competitions are all among important consequences that have emanated and emerged within the past few years followed by intensification of tensions in relations between Tehran and Riyadh; they all have happened to entangle Saudi Arabia more than any other country with various difficulties and problems.

Today, the Zionist regime and the U.S. are two main winners of convulsive relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Effective factors to the new attitude adopted by Saudi Arabia are as follows:

  1. International level

At international level, what caused Riyadh to negotiate and compromise with Iran are the changes taking place inside the U.S. and at international level. Taking office by Biden who, unlike Trump, has not willingness to put his full weight behind Saudi Arabia from one side, and change of power pole in international system which is being transferred from the West to the East from the other side have made Saudis to conclude that in regional competitions with Iran, they can’t count on the U.S. and Western countries’ support like in the past.

Today, the main concentration and the limelight of the U.S. foreign policy, as well as defense and security affairs have been inclined from the West Asia to China; recent developments of Afghanistan and the flee of Ashraf Ghani and his government is a useful experience for Saudis that the U.S. can’t be trusted.

  1. Regional level

At regional level, Yemen is considered to be an important factor for the necessity of rapprochement of relations between Tehran and Riyadh. It is crystal clear that Saudi Arabia has completely lost the war in Yemen. The war did not only realize the determined objectives of Saudi Arabia in the country but made them face with different security, political, military and of course, economic problems.

Yemen war has reduced the foreign currency reserves of Saudi Arabia from $750 billion to $ 450 billion! A country where not even a bullet was shot against within the past 100 years, now its capital and every other inch of the country has become the target of barrage of missiles and drone units of Ansarullah because of miscalculation and insist on her convulsive measures!

  1. Internal level

The country has different plans for her development and transition from an oil-based economy to non-oil based and to become the economic pole of the region, the advancement and realization of which require foreign investment. Economic outlook 2030, NEOM Mega-project, or smart city of $ 500 billion, and other economic programs in a situation where the country is within the reach of missiles of Ansarullah, and suffers from an unhealthy foreign policy can not realize even at very low levels either.

Rapprochement of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia has strategic importance, a few examples of which are as follows:

  • Removal of costs caused from bilateral disputes
  • Possibility of the settlement of major part of existing challenges at regional level (Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, etc.)
  • Boosting security and stability levels of the Western Asia and the World of Islam
  • Reducing the lobbies’ pressure of Saudi Arabia in the U.S. against Iran on the region’s missiles and nuclear issues
  • Facilitating the transition process of Saudi Arabia from an oil-based to non-oil based economy

Although the progress of Tehran-Riyadh peace talks is time taking and face a difficult way ahead, yet it depends on the willingness and preparedness of Saudi Arabia to adopt principled attitudes as well as independent and realistic behaviors more than anything else.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading