25-Year Cooperation Agreement between China and National interests of Iran

2021/05/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online- Signing of the 25-year agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and China within the past few months, has fanned a lot of debates. Efforts have been made to assess it from different points of view in this short article and to elaborate its consequences for Iran’s national interest. Arash Raeissinia, Professor of International Relations, Tehran University

Having scrutinized the draft first published in June 2020, it is assumed that energy in economic fields is the most important area covered by the Agreement. Iran is in need of investment, especially in infrastructures from one hand, and China needs the security of supply in its required energy from other hand. It should be remembered that Iran is the only country that can provide strategic access of China to the Persian Gulf energy resources through the land connecting network, and save China from its dependence on the Malaga Strait and its vulnerable Achilles heel. In the meantime, Iran is the only oil-rich country in West Asia that follows its own independent energy policies.

Other fields such as scientific and technological areas will be similarly influenced by the Agreement Cooperation. Scientific cooperation in new technologies, especially Nano-technology has been referred to in the text of the Agreement repeatedly. A country like Iran is in need of the most recent know-how in infrastructure, logistics, and rail-road to play its important role in the new silk road.

Although, the achievements are important, yet it is assumed that lack of strategic conceptions has reduced the capacities of the Agreement to superficial levels. This could be seen in the understanding of the process emanated from the unwanted outcomes of the competition between China and the US at the international level which, wantedly or unwantedly, will bring about the combination of important threats and opportunities for Iran. Biden’s policies against China are in line with Trump policies against Beijing. However, Biden tries to adopt a multilateral approach along with his European allies. The US is unable to exert pressure on the land Belt, it therefore, is not following the US previous policies like New Silk Road Initiative (NSRI) to link the Central Asia to India through Afghanistan, of which Tapi pipeline (Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India) and Lapis lazuli corridors are the remaining parts. Instead, the US will concentrate on the sea rout where it can exert pressure on China. For the first time during Trump Administration, Pentagon combined Asia-Pacific and Indian Oceans centcoms to make the Indo-Pacific cent-com in order to contain China in India and the Pacific oceans. Biden has bowed to the twist and even tries to further strengthen the quadrilateral alliance called Quad including the US, India, Japan, and Australia. This shows that the future US policies in the coming year must be seen as such: Leave the Belt, Press the Road. This means that the land belt of the Silk Road will spare from the US pressure, but the sea route will totally remain under pressure. In short, Beijing’s effort to launch and advance the new Silk Road must be seen in the competition between Washington-Beijing in the competitive economic areas at the “surface” level. But in-depth, the New Silk Road will remain the geo-politics rivalry between China and the US to dominate the world during the 21st century.

China has so far, tried to go on with its policies in West Asia based on the positive balance with the regional parties involved in the tension. Beijing has established close economic relations with Ankara and the Persian Gulf sheikhdoms. Likewise, because of its dire need for new technologies, China adopted increasing cooperation with the Zionist Regime. Yet, because of the unwanted outcomes of China’s containment policy adopted by the US as well as Biden’s pressure on his middle-east allies not to support Beijing, the relations between Tehran –Beijing will be transformed from economic to strategic relations more than ever in the past. In fact, the US unwantedly sponsors the formation of a new strategic block (and not an alliance) between the Lion and the Dragon.

In such a competition of power between China and the US, Iran should establish her policies based on seizing the opportunities and bypassing the threats. If the Chinese sea route is under pressure, then we should be smart in selection of our ports allocated to China. With her macro strategy called MAOSAM, and having played the pivotal role, India follows the idea of establishing economic relations with her traditional trade partners in the Indian Ocean. The region covers East Africa, Southern Iran, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. It can be understood that the Indian presence in Chabahar port is the first step to materialize her MAOSAM strategy and launching her Cotton Road to have access to Afghanistan and Central Asia through Chabahar port, confronting with Chinese pearl chain and joining the North-South economic corridor. That’s the reason one should understand why Chabahar port is the only place in Iran to remain unhurt from the US sanctions. If the Chinese presence in Chabahar port will lead to Indian exit, then it is not a far-sighted decision because it would lead to the sanction of a single oceanic port in Iran. So, it will be better if we encourage China to invest in Jaask (and not Chabahar) port. For sure, China would rather establish its commercial base in a port nearer to the Strait of Hormuz, the critical energy highway, or at least we should smartly manage the simultaneous presence of New Delhi and Beijing in Chabahar port.

In short, Iran can’t benefit from the strategic achievements of the Agreement without harboring this notion that she is the fulcrum of the new Silk Road.

A package of import-export agreements accompanied with promises of political support will not stay for long without any connecting way between the two ancient civilizations. The outlook of the effect of the Agreement to the benefit of Iran’s national interests can be visualized only if we have a strategic conception.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading