Why foreign policy was lacking in Joe Biden’s inauguration speech?

2021/02/07 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An analyst of America issues says Joe Biden’s inauguration speech demonstrated that domestic issues of the United States is put on the spotlight while foreign policy has been sidelined as Americans are facing identity threats from inside.

Amirali Abolfath told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that while Trump highlighted the “America First” slogan during his inauguration speech in 2017, Biden used the “America United” theme for his inauguration speech to deal with the domestic problems of the United States created during 2017 and 2021 by the Trump administration.

“On the basis of the America First them, Trump had proposed promises to make America Great Again. Trump focused his speech on domestic problems especially in the area of economy and finance and emphasized that the US needs to focus on domestic issues and resolve domestic problems.”

He said that Trump highlighted that US allies need to pay the costs if they seek American support.

“On his foreign policy during the inauguration speech, Trump indicated that he is not going to give a free ride to others. For the first time in history, the President of the United States used the word “Islamic terrorism” and that was important for Muslims and Islamic countries.”

Abolfath said Trump believed that domestic issues are prioritized over foreign warmongering and interventions, adding that the former US president focused his attention on patriotism and nationalism.

Biden’s inauguration speech focus on domestic issues

Abolfath referred to the main points of Biden’s inauguration speech as the new US President and said his speech focused on the issue of strengthening democracy and unity inside America.

“Biden specifically focused on two points. The first issue was to safeguard and strengthen democracy which he emphasized was undermined and jeopardized during the last elections and the second issue was to consolidate unity among Americans,” he said, adding that Biden highlighted the need for the American society to set aside differences and consolidate unity.

He said while Trump focused his theme on America First, Biden spotlighted United America in his inauguration.

Abolfath said Biden did not refer to foreign policy in his inauguration speech, adding that domestic issues have gained precedence even after four years of Trump’s focus on them.

“This Biden’s policy in his inauguration speech indicates that domestic issues remain salient in the United States even after four years of focus on resolving domestic issues. After four years, people in the United States are still worried and concerned about domestic maladies and want to find solutions to overcome them. Under such circumstances, foreign policy has become sidelined as Americans are facing identity threats from inside.”

This expert of American studies referred to the focus of attention of the politicians and public opinion of other countries to the inauguration speech of US presidents in the past and said while inauguration speeches of US presidents attract the attention of other countries, domestic issues such as welfare, business, employment, insurance, security and integrity and efficiency of the state are more important for Americans.

“Foreign policy has never been a priority for American presidents during their inauguration speech unless there is a foreign policy issue influencing the daily life of American people. Indeed, foreign policy per se is of no significance for ordinary American people. One of the criticisms against former US governments especially in the 1980s and the 1990s was that the country’s energy was exhausted on focusing on foreign policy issues as in those years US presidents assumed big roles and focused their energy on foreign policy issues and its costs.”

 

Domestic restrictions of the United States

Referring to Trump’s desire to openly and radically reduce costs of American engagement in foreign policy issues, Abolfath said “Since there are traces of internationalism and globalism inside the Biden’s administration, he wants to make a balance in this respect. Biden does not want to oppose in the same degree Trump rejected globalism; however, there are restrictions inside the United States for Biden as very serious dangers and menaces have been created in the past four years inside America, leading Biden to put his focus more on domestic rather than foreign issues.”

This expert of American issues said domestic issues are usually highlighted in most of speeches by American presidents in the past, adding that George Bush inauguration speech was made in 2005 in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks while he highlighted issues of national security, terrorism and the war on terrorism.

Therefore, he said, Bush focused a major part of his speech on the inauguration of his second term in office on such foreign policy issues but that was an exception.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Challenges Facing Modi in Indian General Election

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on East Asian affairs said: Despite the chances of victory, the number of seats that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will have in the next parliament is likely to be less because it seems that Muslims and other ethnic groups would vote for parties opposed to the ruling party.

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading