Threat of Suspending Iran’s Voting Right; Blatant Disregard of UN Charter

2021/02/06 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The warning to suspend Iran’s voting right in the United Nations prepares the ground for denying Iran access to international rights and opportunities. Reza Majidzadeh - Researcher on Political Economy of Development

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres announced on January 13 that Iran, along with countries such as Libya, Comoros and Central Africa, are at the risk of deprivation from voting right for non-payment of their membership dues for more than two years. In fact, Guterres has warned member states that UN funding will last until the end of October, and if indebted countries do not pay their dues, they will be forced to sell some of the organization’s assets. The 129 member states have paid 1.990 billion dollars in membership fees and the UN budget deficit is 1.386 billion dollars.

Although Iran’s membership fee has been paid to the United Nations over the past few years despite widespread financial and commodity sanctions, and negotiations have been underway since 2018 to pay for this year’s membership fee through a secure channel, it appears that this point has not been taken into account, and UN officials have made no distinction between non-payment of debts as a result of sanctions and blocking of financial and banking channels and access to international instruments with non-payment of debts.

However, according to Article 19 of the UN Charter, if the United Nations concludes that non-payment of membership dues by a country is due to factors beyond the authority and control of that country, it may not suspend its voting rights. Even Iran’s latest offer to pay off this debt has been the withdrawal of blocked resources in South Korea with the permission of the Central Bank of Iran.

Apart from the ongoing negotiations, an important point in this matter is the enforceability of the laws and their provisions at international level and negligence or lack of information of those laws. In other words, the Secretary-General of the United Nations is expected to have full authority over those laws and provisions and consider the provisions of each law. Such negligence, even if it is inadvertent and aimed at one country, in the long run erodes the trust of other members of the United Nations and creates a sense of discrimination among countries based on their level of influence and power.

Although Trump’s flaunt at international arena in disregarding international and regional protocols and treaties as well as violating international law, including the withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), has shown that enforcing laws at the international level, without a supportive power, is meaningless and in practice, exercise of influence plays a more prominent role in international relations. This position, of course, is not a value judgment against world order or conspiracy theory; it rather shows inferences based on the facts of the past few years.

Indeed, the UN Secretary-General’s lack of information of Article 19 of the UN Charter seems unlikely, and it seems that pressure from rival regional countries and the United States has even affected the mentality of international organizations; while the officials of those organizations must take neutral positions in every field; the change in Saudi Arabia’s position over the past few years and its presence as the chair of the Women’s Rights Panel in the Human Rights Council further demonstrates the violation of this neutrality and discrimination. All in all, despite severe US sanctions against Iran over the past few years and heavy economic and financial sanctions for violating sanctions, some countries have opened the door to international opportunism, and have taken steps from blocking Iran’s financial resources up to other measures.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading