Vulnerability of Interests of Zionist Regime and Host Countries in Persian Gulf

2020/09/29 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The illegitimate presence of the Zionists in the Persian Gulf will increase vulnerability of these forces; as the Arab nations of the region are not psychologically and culturally ready to accept the citizens of the Israeli regime and this is considered a serious challenge for Tel Aviv. There may also be underground movements in the future to strike at the interests of the Israeli regime in the Arab countries. Hassan Hanizadeh – Expert of the Middle East

Normalization of relations of the Zionist regime, first with the United Arab Emirates and then with Bahrain, has highlighted this scenario that Tel Aviv, in the light of such relations, would probably intend to maintain a military presence in the region. However, the targets of the Zionist regime should be analyzed a little more deeply and its consequences should be examined.

In fact, the Zionist regime is trying to expand its sphere of influence with two targets; first the Zionist authorities are trying to implement the historical part of the Torah, which oversees the revival of the Greater Israel plan from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Presence of two parallel blue lines in the Israeli flag confirms this, and Israeli officials have been working for the past eighty years to keep the slogan alive in every possible way in the geographical area of ​​the region.

Presence of the Zionist regime in South Sudan and Ethiopia shows that part of the slogan from the Nile to the Euphrates has been fulfilled and now more than 10,000 Israeli military and security experts are active in these two African countries, i.e. South Sudan and Ethiopia.

On the other hand, attempts of the Israeli authorities is aimed at completing the slogan by coming close to the Euphrates, and to this end currently the Tel Aviv officials are trying to achieve their target of Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates through their presence in Iraq and the Kurdish region.

The second purpose of the Zionist regime’s presence in the Persian Gulf countries is to cut off relations of these countries with Iran in the political, economic, military, and security spheres. Based on the ideas of former Israeli President Shimon Peres, Israeli officials believe that by normalizing relations between Tel Aviv and countries members in the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council by 2025 trade volume between the regime and the Persian Gulf states reaches 70 billion dollars annually.

On the other hand, the Zionist regime authorities believe that the military and security presence of this regime on the other side of the Persian Gulf will diminish the influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Meanwhile, the Zionist regime’s domination over a part of the Persian Gulf could lead to causing disturbances for the Iranian ships in this region.

Therefore, it is natural that this presence will cause disturbances for Iran and the level of the Zionist regime’s espionage operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran will increase. At the same time, in addition to the Persian Gulf, Tel Aviv may in the future establish a military presence in the strategic Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in the Red Sea and cause inconveniences to the Iranian merchant ships.

Also, from the point of view of the reactionary Arab regimes on the southern shores of the Persian Gulf, the military presence of the Zionist regime could change the balance of power in favor of these regimes, because Israel has the military capability to confront Iran.

Meanwhile, Iran will vigilantly monitor the Israeli regime’s movements across the Persian Gulf for an appropriate and measured response. However, the reactionary Arab regimes are desperately seeking a confrontation between Tehran and Tel Aviv in the light of formation of a possible global consensus against Iran.

It should also be noted that in such a situation, due to the opposition of Islamic nations with the military presence of Israel in the Persian Gulf, reactionary Arab regimes such as Bahrain, the UAE, and even Saudi Arabia will face serious challenges at home and in the region in future. The Palestinian people now face two enemies; first is the Zionist regime, and the second is the reactionary Arab regimes that are now on the side of Israel. The recent visit of Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas Political Bureau, to Beirut and his meetings with the leaders of the Palestinian militant movements, as well as Haniyeh’s meeting with Hezbollah Secretary General Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, will lead to the formation of a broad and resistant front against the Zionist and reactionary Arab regimes. This will be one of the serious dangers of Israel’s presence in the region for its host countries.

Eventually, the illegitimate presence of the Zionists in the Persian Gulf will increase vulnerability of these forces; as the Arab nations of the region are not psychologically and culturally ready to accept the citizens of the Israeli regime and this is considered as a serious challenge for Tel Aviv. There may also be underground movements in the future to strike at the interests of the Israeli regime in the Arab countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading