loader image

Vulnerability of Interests of Zionist Regime and Host Countries in Persian Gulf

2020/09/29 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The illegitimate presence of the Zionists in the Persian Gulf will increase vulnerability of these forces; as the Arab nations of the region are not psychologically and culturally ready to accept the citizens of the Israeli regime and this is considered a serious challenge for Tel Aviv. There may also be underground movements in the future to strike at the interests of the Israeli regime in the Arab countries. Hassan Hanizadeh – Expert of the Middle East

Normalization of relations of the Zionist regime, first with the United Arab Emirates and then with Bahrain, has highlighted this scenario that Tel Aviv, in the light of such relations, would probably intend to maintain a military presence in the region. However, the targets of the Zionist regime should be analyzed a little more deeply and its consequences should be examined.

In fact, the Zionist regime is trying to expand its sphere of influence with two targets; first the Zionist authorities are trying to implement the historical part of the Torah, which oversees the revival of the Greater Israel plan from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Presence of two parallel blue lines in the Israeli flag confirms this, and Israeli officials have been working for the past eighty years to keep the slogan alive in every possible way in the geographical area of ​​the region.

Presence of the Zionist regime in South Sudan and Ethiopia shows that part of the slogan from the Nile to the Euphrates has been fulfilled and now more than 10,000 Israeli military and security experts are active in these two African countries, i.e. South Sudan and Ethiopia.

On the other hand, attempts of the Israeli authorities is aimed at completing the slogan by coming close to the Euphrates, and to this end currently the Tel Aviv officials are trying to achieve their target of Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates through their presence in Iraq and the Kurdish region.

The second purpose of the Zionist regime’s presence in the Persian Gulf countries is to cut off relations of these countries with Iran in the political, economic, military, and security spheres. Based on the ideas of former Israeli President Shimon Peres, Israeli officials believe that by normalizing relations between Tel Aviv and countries members in the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council by 2025 trade volume between the regime and the Persian Gulf states reaches 70 billion dollars annually.

On the other hand, the Zionist regime authorities believe that the military and security presence of this regime on the other side of the Persian Gulf will diminish the influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Meanwhile, the Zionist regime’s domination over a part of the Persian Gulf could lead to causing disturbances for the Iranian ships in this region.

Therefore, it is natural that this presence will cause disturbances for Iran and the level of the Zionist regime’s espionage operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran will increase. At the same time, in addition to the Persian Gulf, Tel Aviv may in the future establish a military presence in the strategic Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in the Red Sea and cause inconveniences to the Iranian merchant ships.

Also, from the point of view of the reactionary Arab regimes on the southern shores of the Persian Gulf, the military presence of the Zionist regime could change the balance of power in favor of these regimes, because Israel has the military capability to confront Iran.

Meanwhile, Iran will vigilantly monitor the Israeli regime’s movements across the Persian Gulf for an appropriate and measured response. However, the reactionary Arab regimes are desperately seeking a confrontation between Tehran and Tel Aviv in the light of formation of a possible global consensus against Iran.

It should also be noted that in such a situation, due to the opposition of Islamic nations with the military presence of Israel in the Persian Gulf, reactionary Arab regimes such as Bahrain, the UAE, and even Saudi Arabia will face serious challenges at home and in the region in future. The Palestinian people now face two enemies; first is the Zionist regime, and the second is the reactionary Arab regimes that are now on the side of Israel. The recent visit of Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas Political Bureau, to Beirut and his meetings with the leaders of the Palestinian militant movements, as well as Haniyeh’s meeting with Hezbollah Secretary General Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, will lead to the formation of a broad and resistant front against the Zionist and reactionary Arab regimes. This will be one of the serious dangers of Israel’s presence in the region for its host countries.

Eventually, the illegitimate presence of the Zionists in the Persian Gulf will increase vulnerability of these forces; as the Arab nations of the region are not psychologically and culturally ready to accept the citizens of the Israeli regime and this is considered as a serious challenge for Tel Aviv. There may also be underground movements in the future to strike at the interests of the Israeli regime in the Arab countries.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading