Fears and Hopes in Inter-Afghan Talks

2020/09/22 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Under the present circumstances, the Taliban do not seem to accept power-sharing based on the Ashraf Ghani Government’s offer of 50% of power and some regional and international players at this juncture do not agree with the outlook that Afghanistan should achieve peace and stability; because for the time being, they do not see their interests in peace and stability in Afghanistan. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi - Expert in Subcontinent Issues

The Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Taliban announced that peace talks between the negotiating Taliban groups and the Kabul government will begin on Saturday (September 12, 2020) in Doha, Qatar. The need for holding such negotiations, known as the inter-Afghan talks, was raised after a peace deal Washington signed with the Taliban in the Qatari capital in February. Also, shortly after the announcement of the commencement of inter-Afghan peace talks, US President Donald Trump announced that his Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was leaving for Qatar to attend the opening of the talks.

In the agreement between the Taliban and the Americans it had been predicted that a month after the agreement was reached, the Taliban and the central government would enter into inter-Afghan talks, establish a ceasefire and pave the way for the establishment of peace; but there were problems in this regard the first of which being that the initiative was American-made and had little to do with the Afghan  government; in fact, they had bypassed the central government. From this angle, President Ashraf Ghani too put up some resistance against them. In the same manner that in connection with the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners from the list given by the Taliban, who were detained by the Kabul government, Ashraf Ghani implemented his own formula; that is to say, he did not release all of the prisoners at one time as they demanded, and finally he came to the point where he abdicated his responsibility; and by forming the Loya Jirga he finally agreed to release the remaining 400 people who had not committed serious crimes.

Of course, it is not yet possible to present an outlook for the future of this trend on such issues as where would Taliban stand in power and to what extent they would gain access to their expectations. But if we intend to look at the issue from an internal perspective and an outlook of regional countries as well as the influence these countries could have on the process of national reconciliation in Afghanistan, it seems that there are three influential currents in Afghanistan developments; the first is the internal events, which embodies political parties, ethnic groups and different religions, and based on the competition among these groups, they should reach a conclusion. However, following the decision made between Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani to elect Abdullah Abdullah as the head of the Peace Council to advance the negotiations, it seems that some unity of opinion has been shaped in Afghanistan.

The second current is the regional countries which should be considered at two levels; first Afghanistan’s peripheral neighbors such as Iran, Pakistan and Central Asian countries, and second, more distant but influential neighbors such as India, Turkey, the UAE and Saudi Arabia which have no common borders with Afghanistan but have defined interests for themselves in that country. Therefore, these two factors of neighbors and regional currents should also reach an agreement and contribute to the peace process in Afghanistan. Otherwise, the conflicting interests of these countries will not let peace to be established in Afghanistan.

The third current is the international players such as Russia, China, the US and Europe. These players should also come to a conclusion that in fact develops a kind of coordination between all three currents in order to enable us to witness a successful inter-Afghan negotiations.

In general, under the present circumstances, the Taliban do not seem to accept power sharing based on the Ashraf Ghani Government’s offer of  50% of power and some regional and international players at this juncture do not agree with the outlook that Afghanistan should achieve peace and stability; because for the time being they do not see their interests in peace and stability in Afghanistan.

However, as the Americans and the Taliban have decided to settle the issue between themselves and Washington wants to avoid additional costs in Afghanistan, the hope has been raised that somehow a coalition government or whatever the Taliban will be involved in it will be formed in the first phase and then through political means they seek the return of the Taliban to power.

Finally, it should be borne in mind that the Islamic Republic of Iran plays an important role in the peace process in Afghanistan, and national interests and security of our country lies in the establishment of peace and stability in the neighboring country and there is no doubt about it. Because, security of Tehran and Kabul are linked to each other. However, if the Taliban return to power, since this is an ideological current and their ideology is a combination of the Deobandi and Salafi schools and their political ties with Pakistan and their ideological ties with Saudi Arabia, Iran does not seem to welcome full and exclusive return of the Taliban to power. Even though, now Iran and many other countries have come to the realization of the fact that peace and stability in Afghanistan is not possible without cooperation of the Taliban.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading