China’s Trump Cards in Competition with US

2020/08/24 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The Americans hope that with the cooperation of India they will be able to implement the India-Pacific project and stop China; but China has opposed the India-Pacific project, meaning it wants to focus from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi - Asia Affairs Expert

The attainment of “global hegemonic power” in the 21st century is considered one of the most important reasons for the current confrontation between the United States and China. The United States has come to the conclusion that China is gradually becoming the world’s number one power, given its set of economic, political, and military conditions, and that it will overtake the United States; So the United States is trying to prevent China from gaining more power. China, meanwhile, has a major advantage over the United States; that is to say, it can obtain relatively cheap fuel in the Persian Gulf region and from other places and develop its industries; because production in China is very high and the cost of production is lower than in the United States; Therefore, we naturally see that Beijing is capturing the world’s consumer markets. This is a problem for American industry and the ruling liberal democratic system.

In such a situation, the Americans hope that with the cooperation of India, they can implement the India-Pacific project and stop China’s progress, but China has proposed the India-Pacific project, that is, it wants to focus from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean; Therefore, the main competition in this region seems to be in the Indian Ocean, and more specifically, this competition is on the Makran Coast with an area of ​​1500 km, part of which is in the hands of Iran and another part in the hands of Pakistan.

Two ports are very important in this area; the first is the port of Chabahar, which is located in Iran and India is making constructions building with the positive reaction of the United States, and the second is the port of Gwadar, which is located in Baluchestan, Pakistan, where the Chinese are present. China has a major project called One-Road One-Belt, which includes a land section that runs from Kasha to Gwadar, where a highway and then a railway line are to be built. The other part includes the oil and gas pipeline, which is to run from the port of Gwadar to China’s Xinjiang province and supply fuel to the western part of China. In this space, the Chinese seem to feel superior and therefore more focused on at least two countries; First, Pakistan, where they are pursuing the C-Pack project, which includes Chinese investment in mining, underground reserves, communications and industry. About $46 billion is expected to be invested by China in Pakistan.

The second is the 25 year comprehensive cooperation between Iran and China, the draft of which has been announced at the moment and it is not clear where it will be launched. The Chinese are using this cooperation as a trump card to implement the design of a one-road one-belt. In this regard, some American politicians have criticized Trump’s policy of maximum pressure against Iran, believing that pursuing this policy will bring Tehran closer to Beijing and thus increase China’s presence in the Persian Gulf, in addition to the Pacific Ocean and this will cause the Sino-US rivalry to become more serious in the Persian Gulf.

Of course, the United States is not idle in the meantime, and the recent agreement between the United Arab Emirates and Israel and the revelation of bilateral relations means that the United States wants to expand its presence in the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf. The US navies are based in Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman and Saudi Arabia, indicating that the Strait of Hormuz is somehow under US control. However, Iran is also making great efforts to secure this strait.

In terms of influence and role-playing in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, it may be said that China is incapable of confronting the United States; In fact, it will take time for China to invest and turn the port of Gwadar into an important port, but the Americans are already in the region. Washington will use the military option to maintain its presence in the region if it deems it necessary.

But in the case of the trade war between Beijing and Washington, it seems that China will win this battle because China’s economy is very aggressive and has been able to capture most of the world’s markets, while US power in the economy due to their internal problems and widespread military presence is declining. Their military is declining in many parts of the world. Yet Americans still hope to curb China’s political and economic influence in the world. In the meantime, there is a debate that countries such as China, Russia and Iran should form a security centre against NATO. If that happens then we will probably see a new kind of Cold War in the world.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Erdogan’s Motives and Opportunities for Reconciliation with the Syrian Government

Strategic Council Online—An expert on Caucasus issues said that the Turkish Foreign Minister recently stated in a joint press conference with his Saudi counterpart: “Our current strategy is dialogue and peace, and we ask Iran and Russia to play a constructive role in this process.” According to these statements, Turkey’s policy towards Syrian refugees and its consequences have once again been considered.

Japan’s Goals of Strengthening Its Military Power in East Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Japan said: Strengthening Japan’s military activities is a 25-year plan to show that it is capable of becoming one of the military powers of the region and the world by relying on its military values and capabilities.

An Analysis of the Possible Approach of the New British Government in Foreign Policy

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on European issues said: The British Labor Party, led by Keir Starmer, won the election by winning an overwhelming majority of the seats in the House of Commons. On the other hand, the Conservative party, led by Rishi Sunak, has lost 170 seats and is on the way to its heaviest political defeat since the party was founded in the 19th century.

Unpredictable Consequences of a Possible Comprehensive Attack on Lebanon for the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Jordan emphasized that the possibility of the Zionist regime’s army attacking Lebanon is high and said it is unlikely the ceasefire negotiations and the release of prisoners will play a deterrent role in preventing the war between this regime and the Hezbollah, the consequences of which cannot be avoided.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Erdogan’s Motives and Opportunities for Reconciliation with the Syrian Government

Strategic Council Online—An expert on Caucasus issues said that the Turkish Foreign Minister recently stated in a joint press conference with his Saudi counterpart: “Our current strategy is dialogue and peace, and we ask Iran and Russia to play a constructive role in this process.” According to these statements, Turkey’s policy towards Syrian refugees and its consequences have once again been considered.

Japan’s Goals of Strengthening Its Military Power in East Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Japan said: Strengthening Japan’s military activities is a 25-year plan to show that it is capable of becoming one of the military powers of the region and the world by relying on its military values and capabilities.

An Analysis of the Possible Approach of the New British Government in Foreign Policy

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on European issues said: The British Labor Party, led by Keir Starmer, won the election by winning an overwhelming majority of the seats in the House of Commons. On the other hand, the Conservative party, led by Rishi Sunak, has lost 170 seats and is on the way to its heaviest political defeat since the party was founded in the 19th century.

Unpredictable Consequences of a Possible Comprehensive Attack on Lebanon for the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The former ambassador of Iran in Jordan emphasized that the possibility of the Zionist regime’s army attacking Lebanon is high and said it is unlikely the ceasefire negotiations and the release of prisoners will play a deterrent role in preventing the war between this regime and the Hezbollah, the consequences of which cannot be avoided.

Loading