US Intentions behind Increasing Troop Deployment to Eastern Syria

2020/01/20 | political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Although the increase in the number of US troops deployed in eastern Syria cannot significantly affect major developments and the security order in the West Asian region due to its small number, but it could contribute to continuation of Syrian and Iraqi crises as well as affect the oil markets. Dr. Hossein Ajorlou - Middle East affairs expert

The United States has increased the number of its troops in eastern Syria, especially in oil-rich regions over the past few months, and even President Donald Trump in his tweets has pointed to the importance of Syrian oil and US dominance over the oilfields. Now, the question is what are the strategic implications of the increase in the number of US troops in eastern Syria? In response, it can be said that the United States continues to maintain its influence and part at a minimal cost to play a role in the developments in West Asian region.

A glance at US foreign policy in the past decade shows that the United States has sought to reduce its military presence in the West Asian region due to regional conditions as well as the high costs of direct intervention. This issue has been raised in the electoral slogans as well as the stances of Barack Obama and Donald Trump in many different ways. The US goal of reducing military presence does not mean to exercise less influence in the region, but a shift from direct balancing strategy to offshore balancing.

In offshore balancing, the United States will continue to reduce its political, military, security, and economic costs in the region and at the same time maintain a level of its regional role by strengthening its political and security allies. Adoption of this strategy appears to have faced a major challenge in the name of the Axis of Resistance led by the Islamic Republic of Iran in the West Asian region. In recent years, Iran has been able to improve its position in regional equations by playing an effective role in regional developments such as the crises in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen, as well as managing its nuclear case. This has hampered the proper pursuit of an offshore balancing strategy, forcing the United States to maintain part of its forces in the region.

One of these regions is eastern Syria, where, notwithstanding Trump’s statement, we have not only not witnessed a decline in the number of US troops, but even in recent months we have seen an increase to that effect. Looking at the recent developments in the West Asian region and Syria, the reasons for adopting this policy and its strategic implications can be described as follows:

  1. Playing an unrelenting role in Syrian crisis: One of the characteristics of the actor claiming to be hegemonic is his active involvement in regional and international dossiers. Given that Iran and Russia as US rivals, hold the upper hand in the Syrian case, and that the only case that has prompted continued US presence in the case, is its limited military presence in eastern Syria under the pretext of supporting the allied forces, US officials seem to believe that by reducing their military presence in Syria, they have effectively reduced the level of American involvement in the Syrian case and have no further bargaining chip, which is not acceptable to them as a hegemon. That is why the United States is continuing to maintain or even increase its level of engagement in the Syrian developments.
  2. Managing Oil Markets: Many economists believe that given the recent oil market developments such as more output and less demand as well as US entry into the market as an exporter, Washington is seeking to manage its oil markets while maintaining a favorable price and increase oil export. Looking at US policies in recent years, it can be said that by using sanctions tools and through controlled chaos, Washington is seeking to reduce oil exports by other countries and find new clients for its own oil. These experts analyze the oil sanctions against Iran and Venezuela, as well as the crisis in oil-exporting countries such as the Qatar crisis in this line. Although Syria does not have a large share of the oil market but US dominance of these resources can be a good incentive to pursue this US policy.
  3. US Regional Allies Push for Continued Presence in Syria: Given the growing strength of the Axis of Resistance and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s leading role in the West Asian region, US regional allies are seeking its active involvement in regional cases. These allies, especially the Zionist regime and Saudi Arabia, with their lobbying in Washington, are pressuring US officials to continue their presence in Syria. So even after Trump ordered US troops out of Syria in 2018 these states voiced dissatisfaction with the decision and used all their political power to block the implementation of the decision, and given the increase in US troops in Syria, they seems to have been successful in their attempt.
  4. Growing threats against US Troops in Iraq: Due to increased tension between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the US in Iraq, the possibility of increased US casualties in Iraq has gone up. The United States appears to be seeking to help reduce its military casualties by moving troops to Syria while maintaining its role in Iraq.
  5. Reduce friction with Turkey: The presence of US forces in northeast Syria due to the Kurdish-Turkish tensions has created many challenges in US-Turkey relations, and the US appears to be managing this tension. Deployment of US troops on Syria’s oil rich regions which is somewhat distant from the Turkish border, could prevent friction and escalation of tension between Ankara and Washington, as well as continued US support for the forces enjoying American backing in Syria.

To sum it up, although the increase in the number of US troops deployed in eastern Syria cannot significantly affect major developments and the security order in the West Asian region due to its small number, but it could contribute to continuation  of Syrian and Iraqi crises as well as affect the oil markets. It seems that the foreign policy apparatus of the Islamic Republic of Iran should, with careful observation of the developments, adopt appropriate policies to reduce US presence and influence in the West Asian region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading