What Happened at the 14th Astana Meeting on Syria?

2019/12/17 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: The Turkish government has announced that its army will remain on the Syrian soil until the political situation in Syria is stabilized despite calls by Iran, Russia and the Damascus government for withdrawal of foreign forces including the Turkish army from Syrian territory. Hassan Hanizadeh - Middle East affairs expert

Syrian peace talks (Astana 14) was held in Kazakhstan Capital City Nursultan (Dec. 10-11, 2019) with the participation of Syrian peace guarantors including the Islamic Republic of Iran, Russia and Turkey. In a statement issued at the end of the meeting, Iran, Russia and Turkey reaffirmed their strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic as well as to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and highlighted that these principles should be universally respected and complied with;

Syrian opposition calls for an overall change of the constitution, banning presidential tenure for more than two five-year terms, deciding the fate of the armed forces and security apparatus, reducing the powers of the president, delegating executive powers to the prime minister and holding elections and referendum on transferring power to an agreed-upon political figure. And these demands raised at the recent Astana meeting faced opposition from representatives of the Syrian government.

Indeed, representatives of the Syrian government are demanding the transfer of power over a long process and Bashar Assad’s participation in the upcoming presidential election. Therefore, it seems that the talks will take a long time and the output will not be accepted by any of the parties involved.

On the other hand, there is a major disagreement between Turkey, Russia and Iran over the presence of the Turkish military in Idlib. Ankara has occupied parts of Idlib and advanced to a depth of 40 kilometers on Syrian soil. The government of Recep Tayyip Erdogan claims that the Syrian Democratic Forces may unilaterally declare autonomy in northeast Syria in the future, which will undermine Turkey’s security. Therefore, the Turkish government has announced that its army will remain on Syrian soil until the political situation is clear, while Iran, Russia and the Damascus government want withdrawal of foreign forces, including the Turkish military, from the Syrian territory.

Of course, a series of coordination has been made between Russia and Turkey for joint operations against terrorist groups. But Moscow’s dispute with Ankara is that the Turkish government considers the Syrian Democratic Forces part of a terrorist group and bombs its positions in northeast Syria, while Russia does not consider the Democratic Party forces terrorist.

It should be noted that Bashar Assad had promised the Kurds to grant them autonomy after the Syrian crisis was over because they had guaranteed that they would cooperate with the Syrian government against the terrorists and that their cooperation was subject to their autonomy after Syria was cleared of the terrorist groups. This issue now has become a crisis in Syria. Moreover, the autonomy defined by the Syrian Kurdish group in the northeast of the country faces opposition from Turkey.

All these differences have led to the recent negotiations of delegates attending the 14th Astana meeting not to be an acceptable achievement.

It must be noted that after eight years of crisis, the Syrian field and political situation has changed in the interest of Bashar Assad’s government. Despite the Turkish military occupation of Idlib, about 95% of Syrian territory has been cleared of terrorist groups, but reports indicate that the United States, Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime continue to encourage opposition groups to raise their political demands in the peace talks. So Syria’s political situation is now more complicated than it used to be, while the Syrian Armed Forces and the Resistance Axis have taken the initiative in the field.

Meanwhile, part of the Syrian political community wants Bashar Assad to run in the presidential election (if held). If elections are held Assad is very likely to be elected, but opposition groups provoked by the United States, Saudi Arabia and Israel are trying to prevent that.

At the same time, there is currently no strong rival known for Assad, but an opposition transitional council may be formed to transfer power in a six-month process but the Syrian government has opposed the idea.

Despite opposition from Washington, Riyadh and Tel Aviv, Iran and Russia also want Bashar al-Assad to run from happening.

Finally, regarding post-war Syria reconstruction, it should be noted that the damage caused by the eight-year Syrian crisis reportedly amounts to $500 billion, and the Syrian government wants all friendly countries, including Iran and Russia, to participate in the reconstruction. However, it seems that rebuilding the country will take 20 years, and countries such as Iran will be involved in the process.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

France’s Role-Making in West Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European issues spoke about France’s efforts to negotiate with regional countries on the Gaza war; West Asia is having hard times and in the process of transformation; Netanyahu is finished, and everyone is preparing for a significant change.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis on the Adoption the IAEA Board of Governors’ Resolution Against Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international lawyer and senior expert on international affairs said: The abstention and negative votes to the resolution of the Board of Governors regarding Iran should not overshadow the importance of the resolution’s content. In the past, there had been resolutions that were adopted with a similar voting ratio but that, nevertheless, ultimately left a negative impact on the nuclear dossier by shifting the course towards an unfavorable direction.

An Analysis of US House Vote to Sanction International Criminal Court

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of West Asian issues said: The US House of Representatives voted by a comfortable majority on June 4 to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) following its prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The move by the House was taken in full support of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Strategy in Response to Western Sanctions

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Following the escalation of tensions between Russia and Western countries due to the war in Ukraine, Moscow is looking for solutions to deal with the extensive sanctions of the United States and its allies.
Hossein Sayyahi, researcher of international politics

Ambiguities and Prospects of the New US Plan to End the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online: – Opinion: US President Joe Biden recently presented a four-and-a-half-page plan to establish a ceasefire and end the Gaza war. After his speech at the White House, the American President announced that the Zionist regime proposed this plan.
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

An Analysis of the Proposed Peace Plans for Ceasefire in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said: The plans proposed by some Arab governments and the United States for a ceasefire in Gaza and the end of the war are not operational, and rather than looking at solving the crisis in Gaza and Rafah, these countries are after their own national interests.

Growing Trend of Recognition of Independent State of Palestine in the World

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said China’s position on recognizing the Palestinian state is not a new issue, but this agreement and cooperation in the global trend will strengthen the position of supporting Palestine and forming an independent Palestinian state.

France’s Role-Making in West Asia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on European issues spoke about France’s efforts to negotiate with regional countries on the Gaza war; West Asia is having hard times and in the process of transformation; Netanyahu is finished, and everyone is preparing for a significant change.

Loading