Netanyahu’s Defeat; Tel Aviv’s Uncertainty

2019/10/24 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: An international relations professor said the current status of the elections and formation of the government reflects Netanyahu's defeat. Under the current situation, all his concerns is to remain the prime minister and continue to enjoy political and judicial immunity to keep himself and his wife out of court.

Speaking to the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Ahmad Bakhshayesh said: “The Israeli regime has two main parties and four sub-parties. The two main parties are Likud, led by Netanyahu, which has won about 55 seats in its coalition but needs 61 votes to be able to form a cabinet. The other is the Blue and White Party, led by Benny Gantz, with 33 votes and the Arabs about 11 votes.

He said that while Netanyahu was prime minister, he thought he could form government within 28 days. He had contacted Benny Gantz three times and proposed formation of the unity government. He was even willing to hand over good offices to Benny Gantz, for example in the cabinet giving the best positions to the Blue and White Party. Netanyahu and his wife have a series of financial lawsuits which will drag the couple to court. As long as he is prime minister, he is immune and that is why he repeatedly suggested to Benny Gantz that they should form a national unity government.

The international relations professor said Benny Gantz looks set to succeed in forming government, adding that he has been given 28 days to form a government. When Benny Gantz proposes to form a government, he will be the prime minister himself, but will distribute positions.

Referring to Netanyahu’s failure to win six votes in 28 days, he said: “It looks like Benny Gantz is giving the Likud and Lieberman the concessions and with the help of the Arabs he can form his coalition government.”

Bakhshayesh saying the coalition government is usually vulnerable, added: “If the parties fail to form coalition, there should be re-election, in which case the Likud Party would show a weaker performance as it has been in office for three years and is usually blamed for weaknesses.” Under the current conditions in the Zionist regime, Benny Gantz is a demanding party.

On the effects of Zionist regime’s internal failures on Israel’s foreign policy adventures, the professor said: “Israel is strategically backed by the United States because it has always been committed to maintaining Israeli stability and security since 1917 and the Balfour Agreement and after World War II because of the presence of the AIPAC lobby and the wealthy Jews in America. The US has to keep Israel safe anyway.

“Trump is also interested in Netanyahu’s presence, and this will put some pressure on Benny Gantz as he is more focused on domestic issues,” he added. Netanyahu usually focused on foreign policy to divert domestic affairs, such as attacking Lebanon, Syria and Iraq when the election was near, but Benny Gantz is more concerned with Israeli society than Netanyahu. It seems that since his government would be fresh and he has a military background, he will be more concerned with domestic issues.

The international relations professor said the current status of the elections and formation of the government reflects Netanyahu’s defeat. Under the current situation, all his concerns is to remain the prime minister and continue to enjoy political and judicial immunity to keep himself and his wife out of court. Obviously, they will most likely be brought to court after the cabinet of Benny Gantz is formed and Netanyahu’s failure to become prime minister is announced even if he gets a post in government.

Trump worked hard so that Netanyahu will win the election. Trump helped him a lot. His position was entirely in Netanyahu’s favor, but during the formation of the government, Trump was dealing with the impeachment affair.

As for the future state of Zionist foreign regime, he said: “This regime will be a little more conservative, but Israel’s survival will depend on insecurity for others, so its overall policy is to create insecurity.” Having a strategic alliance with the US and attracting its support and creating insecurity around it to stay on the scene are the general policy of this regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading