Consequences of Possible US Negotiations with Ansarollah

2019/09/18 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: The Americans have now come to the conclusion that the continuation of the Yemen war is to the detriment of the West and their position in the region, and are therefore trying to prevent Ansarollah’s increasing power by planning the negotiations. Jafar Ghanadbashi - Middle East Affairs Expert

US officials have recently claimed that they have opened negotiations with Ansarollah to end the Yemen crisis. David Schenker, the Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs, told reporters that the Trump administration is narrowly focused on trying to end the war in Yemen.

However, Hamid Assem, a chief Ansarollah negotiator in an interview with AFP, neither confirmed nor denied that talks had been held.

Regardless of the accuracy of these reports, the announcement by the US officials on negotiations with Ansarollah itself proves a number of very important points; first, the United States has accepted Ansarollah and the Houthis as the main negotiator and rejected Saudi claims that the group was terrorist or coup plotter. This could have many negative consequences for Saudi Arabia and could weaken its position in the region and in international relations.

On the other hand, the United States by holding these talks seeks to bypass Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and take the initiative in Yemen. Washington seeks to reduce reliance on its infamous allies in the region as far as possible, something that should be included in Trump’s election campaign program next year or at least ease the intensity of the criticisms of US-Saudi ties.

Another important issue is that the Americans have now come to the conclusion that the continuation of the Yemen war is to the detriment of the West and their position in the region, and are therefore trying to prevent Ansarollah’s increasing power by planning such talks. This US attempt and aim indicates that Washington has no hope that Riyadh would be able to end the Yemeni crisis without suffering irreparable losses.

Indeed, what is certain is that the Americans view the continuation of the Yemeni war to their detriment and by trying to end the war, explicitly admit that continuing the Yemeni crisis will result in strengthening Ansarollah, as well as the movement’s allies and supporters. In the meantime, as noted, this US action means ignoring the damage the end of the war will inflict on Saudi Arabia because the end of the war in the current situation will clearly mean the defeat of Riyadh.

On the contrary, Ansarollah’s attitude about the negotiations is also important; Principally the Ansarollah is unlikely to engage in full-fledged negotiations with the Americans. In their view, a positive response to the passive US request will mean low-level contacts and efforts to divide the US and its allies in the region. It is because, according to the rule, if Ansarollah wants to negotiate with the US in the conventional sense, it will raise a series of demands that Washington will have to meet.

Since the beginning of the war, Ansarollah has insisted that before holding any negotiations it wants the war to ends first and then deal with the wounded and prisoners of war. However, this demand by Ansarollah, namely the end of the war, has not been materialized yet. Therefore, it seems that these negotiations will be pursued at a low level because the conditions set by Ansarollah have not been met.

The current negotiation between Ansarollah and the US can be somewhat compared to the Taliban-Washington talks, implying that the Americans may want to repeat the experience of the Taliban talks which excluded the central government in Kabul. Nevertheless, the US talks with the Taliban too have failed and President Donald Trump has announced the suspension of the negotiations after the Taliban claimed responsibility for a recent bomb attack in Afghanistan.

There are, of course, differences, such as Ansarollah, unlike the Taliban, is not an internal group but a stream independent of Yemeni central government that has taken over part of the country. So the realization of negotiations with Ansarollah is higher than the Taliban.

However, it is also possible that the United States may seek to deceive Ansarollah by conducting negotiations. That is, Washington may engage Ansarollah in the political scene and, on the other hand, inflict blows on it in the military field: An issue that Ansarollah will undoubtedly take into consideration.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading