Behind the Scene of Dubai-Abu Dhabi Disputes

2019/07/20 | political, top news

Strategic Council Online: The United Arab Emirates, as its name implies, consists of seven emirates with Dubai and Abu Dhabi being the most important ones; however, these two emirates have always had differences of views over the expansion of their domination and power inside and outside the country due to adopting opposite policies and tendencies. Davoud Ahmadzadeh - Middle East Affairs Expert

Dubai is considered an economic hub that follows international trade and investment talks with American and European countries, while Abu Dhabi Sheikhdom is a sovereign and dominant emirate due to its political status and oil reserves. In other words, through the sale of oil and the revenues thereby, it provides financial and economic assistance to other UAE sheikhdoms by providing these donations and concessions Abu Dhabi retains its dominance over the other emirates.

The UAE was founded in 1971, and as it was mentioned, Dubai became the trade centre of the Emirates and Abu Dhabi acted as the centre of politics and governance; according to the constitution of the UAE, the Abu Dhabi ruler operates as the supreme authority and the prime minister and vice president are picked from Dubai as second and third highest official places in the country. At present, Khalifa bin Zayed is the ruler of Abu Dhabi and Mohammad bin Rashid al-Maktoum is the ruler of Dubai.

Despite news censorship and an atmosphere of political repression, disagreements between the two Emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi became more apparent when the ruler of Abu Dhabi Mohammad Bin Zayed, was in full compliance with the regional policies of Saudi Arabia and in a self-made coalition it tried to continue massacre of innocent and poor Yemenis by crisis building and dispatching troops to the south.

On the other hand, the Emirates, with Ben-Zayed’s sovereignty remains one of the main obstacles in the way of stabilizing and restoring peace to Syria alongside Saudi Arabia. The adoption of these war-mongering policies in the region is not favourable to the other small sheikhdoms. Meantime, sheikhdoms like Fujairah and Ajman regard these policies the main cause of bloodshed and chaos in the region as well as in making the UAE poorer.

In fact, apart from Abu Dhabi, which seeks to keep pace with Saudi policies in pursuit of the war-mongering strategies in the region, other sheikhdoms do not advocate this strategy. On the question of Qatar in particular, the hardline positions of Abu Dhabi officials have not been consistent with other policies of the UAE sheikhdoms in extending and maintaining the sanctions against Doha so that the Emirate of al-Fujairah has unexpectedly declared independence and separation, and even Sheikh Rashed Bin Hamad, the second governor of al-Fujairah secretly travelled to Doha and sought asylum in Qatar.

However, this separation is the first in the history of the United Arab Emirates, although many tried to cover it up somehow, in any case, the main argument is that the continuation of disputes within the UAE sheikhs can undermine its already unstable sovereignty more than before.

On the other hand, as mentioned, some experts speak of political disagreements between some Emirates, in particular Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and maintain  that Abu Dhabi is destroying Dubai’s security and stability, because Dubai believes in non-state trade and economic policies based on the free market system and expansion of business cooperation with other countries in the region. While the possession of oil and its distribution through Abu Dhabi has caused the sheikhdom to dictate its policies to other emirates.

Other news reports indicate that there are internal differences regarding the adoption of regional policies towards Iran, which suggests that Dubai and some other UAE sheikhdoms, due to extensive trade relations with Tehran and the presence of Iranians in the economic and security structure of these sheikhdoms, seek easing of tensions and establishment of healthy and constructive relations with Tehran; Abu Dhabi and its rulers on the other hand, support tension and presence of interventionist forces in the Persian Gulf region, especially the Americans, because of blindly following the regional policies of Saudi Arabia.

So, it can be said that along with how the mechanisms of organizing security and economic policies of the UAE sheikhdoms in relation to Syrian, Yemen and Qatar works out, Iran is one of the issues that, despite the denials and cover-ups of the disputes between the United Arab Emirates is one of the decisive points of difference in the country’s decision-making process.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading