Impact of ‘Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process’ on Afghan Peace Talks

2019/07/17 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: Heart of Asia - Istanbul Process Meeting is expected to help build peace and stability in Afghanistan so that the interests of the neighbouring countries of Afghanistan are also served. Pir Mohammad Mollazehi - Subcontinent Affairs Expert

“Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process” Preliminary Meeting was held in Ankara with the participation of senior officials from Turkey, Afghanistan and representatives of member states and their sponsor organizations (June 25).

The first meeting of “Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process 2011” was held with the participation of foreign ministers from 14 countries including Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan and the United Arab Emirates.

The second meeting of the “Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process 2012” was hosted by Afghanistan, the third round (2013) was held in Kyrgyzstan, the fourth (2014) in China, the fifth (2015) in Pakistan, the sixth (2016) in India with participation of delegates from 40 countries, the seventh (2017) in Azerbaijan under the theme “security and economic connectivity to improve the situation in the Heart of Asia”.

Australia, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Finland, Germany, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Norway, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States are also countries that support this trend. Several regional and international organizations have also supported it.

As noted above, the conference began in Istanbul in 2011, and in the first place neighbouring countries of Afghanistan, such as Iran and China, which share borders with this country, and in the second place neighbouring countries that do not have a common border but have influence, such as Turkey, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and India attended the conference.

These countries have proposed a plan to somehow help Afghanistan achieve peace by adopting a regional outlook about the country’s problem. Because the trend followed by the Americans is one that will let the Western powers take the initiative. As a result, the Istanbul Process was launched to enable Afghanistan’s neighbouring countries to pursue another trend to attain Afghan peace.

Because there is a perception that every issue in Afghanistan will somehow affect its neighbouring countries: countries that share borders with Afghanistan or countries that have some kind of interests there. Therefore countries that are covered by each of these groups attended the Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process meeting to help track the peace process in Afghanistan. It should also be noted that this initiative was originally proposed by Iran, but later it was more followed by Russia.

With these points in mind, the overall agenda of this meeting is how to help Afghanistan establish peace in the country and how the Taliban will reach understanding with Afghan government forces. Another goal of the meeting is the diminution of the role of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, as Doha talks have so far advanced to some extent, and the Taliban and Americans are said to have agreed on two main demands of the parties.

The US wanted the Taliban to negotiate with the central government and accept the peace process, and the Taliban demand complete US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the Doha talks apparently they have reached some conclusions and the ground has been prepared to make the talks somewhat intra-Afghan. However, the situation is now more favourable than the past, and for this reason, it is expected that the Heart of Asia – Istanbul Process meeting will contribute to the establishment of peace and stability in Afghanistan, in the interests of the countries neighbouring Afghanistan more than before.

Finally, it should be noted that such meetings are in some way aimed at countering the unilateralism of the United States of America in the world, and in this regard, in particular, the American initiative on Afghan peace is largely questioned.

It is very important for the countries of the region to play a role in the complex issue of Afghanistan, and the presence of China and Russia in this summit has further affected the trend of US unilateralism.

When other influential sources of power are involved in important global developments linked to peace and stability, these powers can also play a role, and so we will witness the strengthening of multilateralism globally. It should be borne in mind that the Europeans are also aligned with this process, and even their interests demand that the United States will not be the lone rider and advance its own policies. Meanwhile, the United States, too, has supported this process because Washington will support any move that will help build peace and stability in Afghanistan. In fact, there is a common goal between all the countries, namely establishing peace in Afghanistan, but the difference is in the question as to who holds the initiative.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading