loader image

European Powers’ Policy towards Iran

2019/06/01 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: Europe does not seem to tilt toward the United States, but at the same time INSTEX too is unlikely to take some effective action. Abdolreza Faraji Rad - European Affairs Expert

In an overall assessment of the European countries’ policy towards Iran, we can say that they share almost the same line of policy. None of these countries, including the UK, France, Germany and other EU states really want the failure of the Iran Nuclear Agreement and Iran’s pullout from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

But when it comes to the recent tensions, the policy of European countries is different; in this respect, Britain is trying to get closer to America and follow its line of policies. London has adopted a similar policy line towards other countries. In other words, as soon as there are conflict or tension somewhere Britain sides with the United States. In the case of the US invasion of Afghanistan, Britain was one of the first countries contributing military support to the United States. In the case of Iraq, Britain immediately announced it was ready to join the US.

Over the past few weeks, as tensions have risen between Tehran and Washington, we are witnessing that London while supporting the JCPOA is acting in a way that if there is a problem between Iran and the US, it will naturally side with the US and join the US front.

The British excuse for declaring this position is that they have made numerous investments in the region to keep which they must enter into war. But if they are asked in the event of a military conflict why should they enter a war with Iran in order to maintain these investments and fight alongside a country that is the initiator of war and has pulled out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action they would have no response.

In relation to other countries, such as France and Germany, it should also be noted that the French almost followed their past policies in the recent tensions between Iran and the United States. That is to say in the same way they supported the JCPOA with some reservations (they always raise the issue of the Iranian missiles), they take very cautious stances about a possible confrontation between Iran and the US, and they are trying to put fire in the ashes. It could be said that among the European powers, Germany has had the best position in relation to the recent tensions. On the very first days of escalation of tension between Tehran and Washington, especially when Iran declared the suspension of some of its JCPOA commitments and set a 2-month deadline to Europe to take the next step, the Germans put the blame on Donald Trump for pulling out of the JCPOA and causing all these problems.

After tensions heightened, Germany tried to calm down the situation and even announced that it will send their political director to Tehran. Media reports on this issue quoted German officials as having said that Berlin would not ask for Washington’s permission to send its director general to Tehran.

To sum it up, Britain’s policies in these tensions, despite announcing that they comply with the Iran Nuclear Agreement are closer to the United States; French policy has not changed, and Germany has kept a distance from the United States to some extent. Other European countries, especially Eastern Europe, have kept mum in this regard and have not made any specific comments. In fact, Iran’s issue is not important for most of these countries, while many leaders in these countries endorse the right-wing policies of Trump, especially in Eastern Europe, and they naturally do not take a particular position on this matter, although they know that Washington is guilty.

With regard to possible scenarios in relations between Iran and Europe, given the US hindrances, it does not seem that these countries would tilt towards the United States, but at the same time, it would not be possible for INSTEX (Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges) to take some effective action. Europeans keep saying that they are severely under pressure and are even insulted by the Americans. But now it seems that they are not ready to display some dedication. Meanwhile, although Europe has been under US pressure and insulted, they have signed an important security deal that they must try to protect. This effort requires the cooperation of China and Russia in order to find a solution.

Europe can take advantage of the two-month opportunity and take some positive action through new initiatives and exchange of ideas with Iranian, Russian, Chinese, and even Indian sides. Indeed, they do not even have to engage Iran directly to avoid US pressures, but they can benefit from initiatives and circumvent part of the sanctions with the cooperation of Iran and other member states of the JCPOA.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading