Iran’s Nuclear Approach to Counter America

2019/05/31 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: The Americans will revise their Iran policy once they find out that the anti-Iran sanctions have had either little impacts or are ineffective. Hassan Beheshtipour - International Affairs Expert

The United States in line with what is described as ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran has tightened restrictions on Tehran’s nuclear program by revoking two key sanctions waivers in a bid to force Tehran to stop producing low-enriched uranium.

The two waivers – one that allowed Iran to store excess heavy water produced in the uranium enrichment process in Oman, and another that allowed Iran to swap enriched uranium for mined uranium “yellowcake” with Russia – were not renewed.

In fact, the US has announced that any country buying Iran’s enriched uranium excess or swap it with natural uranium will be subjected to sanctions.

This left Tehran with two options: Either stop enrichment (which was not what Iran wanted) or ignore the ceiling set for uranium production!  Iran chose the second option. Thus, Iran by using the new generation of centrifuges, called IR6, increased its uranium enrichment capacity more than four times compared to former centrifuges called IR1. This was done to make the other side understand that it cannot stop Iran’s peaceful plan by boycotting the purchase of its surplus uranium or heavy water. This action is a signal to the other side to realize that Iran is not empty handed in dealing with the United States.

During this time, Iran did not need to produce more uranium but has already decided to increase its enriched uranium to 300 kilograms. It should be noted that Iran’s enriched uranium reserves have not increased 4 times, but we have moved in that direction to quadruple our production.

Iran’s move would not be regarded as a violation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) as long as it complies with the 300 kg reserve limit. It should also be noted that since America was the initiator of this course Tehran’s action was just a response to the US restrictions.

According to the Iran Nuclear Agreement (also known as JCPOA), Iran accepted not to store more than 300 kilograms of 3.67% enriched uranium and sell the surplus or swap it for natural uranium. The other party also has undertaken to accept the conditions for selling ​​surplus uranium or heavy water.

Meanwhile, Russia has requested an urgent meeting of the JCPOA Commission to consider how to deal with Iran’s 60-day deadline.

Iran’s specific demand is that the restrictions imposed on the country be lifted.

This is under conditions that failure to return to pre-JCPOA conditions is very important for Russia and Europe, as these countries consider Iran’s a nuclear power a threat against them and therefore they will seriously try to win Iran’s positive view.

There are, of course, many buts and ifs as to whether Europe has the possibility of cooperating with Iran or not. Because Europe over the past one year has shown that it apparently “wanted” to cooperate with Iran but did not have the “possibility” of taking such a move against US sanctions.

Iran’s move now is a signal for the other side, especially the United States and Europe, to know that Iran’s hands are not empty to counteract the violation of the JCPOA by the United States and Europe’s procrastination.

Regarding the future of the developments, one scenario is that Iran would continue to move toward more uranium production. Because Iran now has 110 tons of yellow cake, which we have received from Russia in return for 10 tons of enriched uranium; we also have 110 tons of stored natural uranium.

Therefore, Iran can continue the same trend so that Europeans would take some action. A pessimistic scenario also is to regard Europe lacking the necessary facilities for this task, and Russia alone would take action to meet Iran’s demand.

Some observers believe that the Russians will not be able to do anything under these conditions, and the only way is for Iran to enter into negotiations with America.

Ultimately, Iran’s recent move in suspending part of its commitment should have been taken at the very beginning of the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal. However, even though this action was taken with delay but as they say it is better to lose the saddle than the horse. On the other hand, it should be noted that although boosting Iran’s nuclear power can be very good and effective, it alone cannot force America to revise its policy. Tehran should also make significant economic reforms so that Washington would realize that the sanctions against Iran have had little or no impacts. In fact, the Americans would reconsider their policy when they realize that the sanctions are ineffective or have little impacts.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

Loading