US Deeply Concerned about Stronger Iran-China Relations

2020/08/19 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online - Many countries are redefining their previous relations with the Western bloc and paying much more attention to countries in the East, such as China, India, Japan, South Korea and even Russia because they know that in the 21st century, the world economic development revolves around Asian major powers.

Given the tremendous changes that have taken place in the international economic system and the dramatic changes that have occurred in the new international order, and the rise of some countries as emerging economic powers, many scholars believe that the 21st century is the century of Asia. It is also predicted that two very important Asian powers, namely China in East Asia and India in South Asia in the 21st century and from 2025 onwards, according to many indicators will become the first and third largest economic power in the world. This makes them look more positively at Asia as the hub of the global economy.

Experts agree that China will become the world’s largest economic power in the next few years; this is realized in the light of several economic, geographical and demographic realities. China is one of the largest countries in the world in terms of size and currently has the largest population in the world. Most importantly, China has rapidly become the world’s largest market and one of the largest producers of various goods due to the economic development it has achieved in recent decades. Therefore, different countries and economic blocs in the world are expected to pay more attention to China. The European Union, for example, which was once America’s largest trading and economic partner is gradually turning to China, and this trend has intensified, especially after the escalation of trade tensions between Washington and Brussels. Recently, we witnessed a meeting between the leaders of China and the leaders of the European Union with the aim of explaining and creating the necessary perspectives for the development of bilateral relations.

Meanwhile, India is gradually improving its role in the global economy due to its size, population and resources, and forecasts suggest that India will become the third largest economic power in the world in the next few years. This issue plays an important role in explaining the future of India and its position in the global economy. At the same time, Japan, which for a long time was the world’s second largest economy (although today its position has shrunk), is still one of the most important countries in the world in terms of economy, trade and industry, as well as in the field of new technologies. South Korea, despite not being considered in terms of population and size, but due to its industrial power and production and advanced technology, is one of the leading economies in the world.

Russia, as a Eurasian power, should not be overlooked; a country that has one foot in Europe and one foot in Asia. For this reason, Russia can be considered a semi-Asian country. Although Russia is the world’s largest energy producer and has considerable economic power, its economy still relies heavily on oil and gas exports and some industrial items. However, Russia has great potential for expanding relations with other countries.

Given these facts, we see that the United States is working hard to prevent China from increasing its economic power, and in this way, the Donald Trump administration is using all the tools at its disposal, including a trade war and the imposition of new tariffs on Beijing. The Washington administration and its armed forces, under the auspices of the US Department of Defense, have focused on concentrating US troops in the Asia-Pacific region, where 60 percent of the US Navy is stationed. All of this is because the United States is terrified of China becoming the world’s number one economic power and strengthens its growing military role and influence in this area. Meantime it claims that US allies and partners in East Asia have some worries in this respect and concerns and want the US military presence in the region to continue and increase. Specifically, countries such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are mentioned.

Given these facts, the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is now under increasing pressure from the West in general and the United States in particular in the form of policy or campaign of maximum pressure, and unfortunately Washington has achieved success in reducing Iran’s oil exports, Foreign and the need to reduce US pressure on the country, has turned significantly to the east. In this regard, we are witnessing negotiations on a 25-year agreement between Iran and China, which covers six main areas, from trade, economic and oil issues to new Internet technologies and investment in security and defense areas.

Naturally, this has caused concern in the United States, and they have already voiced their opposition. Washington officials claim that the agreement will pose a greater threat from Iran to US regional allies such as Saudi Arabia, the Zionist regime, and others. Therefore, Washington has repeatedly stated its strong opposition to the Iran-China strategic document.

But the fact is that not only Iran but many other countries are now redefining their previous relations with the Western bloc and in this regard they are paying much more attention to countries in the East such as China, India, Japan, South Korea and even Russia. Why? They know that in the 21st century, world economic development revolves around the great Asian powers.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading