Analysis of Iran’s Strategic Authority in Peripheral Waters

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An analyst on West Asia affairs says Iran will in no way detract from its national interests and security and stability in its peripheral waters. ”From the beginning of the victory of the revolution Iran’s principled and strategic policy in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman has been based on creating stability and maintaining sustainable security with the cooperation of the Persian Gulf countries and non-interference of foreign forces.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Asghar Zarei stated that Iran’s principled and strategic policy from the beginning of the victory of the revolution in the Persian Gulf region has been based on lasting security and stability with the cooperation of the Persian Gulf countries and non-interference of foreign forces, adding: In this regard, Iran has always emphasized the need for cooperation and unity of the Persian Gulf countries as the greatest guarantee for its stability and security, and is the only country in the region that has independently undertaken this heavy mission under various conditions of sanctions and threats.

Principled policy of providing collective and participatory security

He added: Strategy of trans-regional actors and enemies in this region is to create insecurity and instability and in return, Iran has considered the policy of providing collective and participatory security in different decades as its main strategy in the Persian Gulf and considers intervention and presence of foreign forces against national interests and security and stability of this region.

Zarei pointed out: The Persian Gulf region is one of the regions that has both strategic value for Iran and is also considered as the center of threats of the opposition and intervening powers; in this regard, Iran has always focused on a regional deterrent system to deal with those threats.

The expert on West Asia affairs said that Iran is committed to provide security of the strategic Persian Gulf waterway, noting: Unfortunately, despite all the positive messages given by Iran and despite the positive plans and approaches, we have been witnessed to some powers on the southern shore of the Persian Gulf turning to foreign countries and to the creation of coalitions and alliances that are against common interests of the countries in the region, and effects of the intervention of the intelligence and security services of Western powers is quite obvious in this regard.

Regional conditions changing

Zarei pointed to the existence of military bases of some Western countries in the southern Persian Gulf countries and continued: The recent policy of normalizing relations between the countries in the southern Persian Gulf and the fake Zionist regime and the open presence of the regime’s military and intelligence forces in those countries show that the situation in the region is changing with the presence of several other actors and some countries, instead of trying to form a sustainable strategy in the region, have continued to organize their approach on the basis of divisive policies and discord.

Referring to the US bomber maneuver and that country’s failed attempt to flee a violator oil tanker from the clutches of Iranian forces, he said: Such issues show that Iran’s defense capabilities have changed dramatically from previous decades and are in no way comparable to the past. In many cases, such capabilities have been proven and demonstrated.

Zarei added: Interception and crash of the Global Hawk, the super-strategic and operational aircraft, in the Jask region from the highest altitude, interception and observation of another of such drones in the northwest of the Persian Gulf and what happened to prevent the escape of the offending oil tanker, in which the IRGC navy demonstrated its power despite the threatening presence of US ships, and their submarine, despite its very high capability, was only passively observing Iran’s power, has been among the scenes of demonstrating Iran’s capabilities.

Supremacy of Iran’s power in the Persian Gulf

The expert on West Asia affairs noted: Such developments show that Iran is the leading power in the region today, and this capability has been proven to all, which we witness in some statements of top officials of Western countries and the fake Zionist regime.

Saying that this defense power and capability could be well operationalized in the Persian Gulf, the Sea of ​​Oman and the Indian Ocean, he referred to the successful operation of sending Iranian tankers to Lebanon and Venezuela and added: The presence of the Iranian navy in St. Petersburg in the farthest point of the northern hemisphere and the presence in a parade held by Russia shows Iran’s capabilities and strategic cooperation with some powers in the region.

Zarei added: Such performance confirms this point that Iran will not in any way detract from its national interests and security and stability in its peripheral waters, and will respond to any action with an accurate and timely response; because security, economy and politics in this region are interrelated. The enemy also knows that Iran is not a forgiver, nor passive about its security and interests.

Emphasizing that Iran has always stressed the need to establish a model of collective security cooperation in the Persian Gulf region, the expert on West Asia affairs continued: Unfortunately, some governments in the southern Persian Gulf region do not have enough independence in their regional and foreign policy and pursue proxy actions by inciting Iranophobia.

Saying that religious and ethnic issues and rivalries in the field of oil have created an inherent rivalry between those countries and Iran, Zarei noted: Unfortunately, those factors have caused the enemies of the region to abuse dependence of the Persian Gulf countries, and today we cannot say optimistically that in the future, it is possible to reach a coalition and an alliance to establish joint security arrangements with some Arab countries in the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading