What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

2023/05/31 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side's efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality. Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.

Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

 

After World War II, the dollar became the world’s reserve currency, and the Bretton Woods system led to the dollar’s dominance in the world economy. But in the 1970s, President Nixon announced the end of the relationship between the dollar and gold, and as a result, the Bretton Woods system ended. Nevertheless, the dollar still maintained its international credibility. Still, after the financial crisis in 2008 and the European debt crisis in 2011, doubts were raised about the continued position of the dollar as a dominant global currency. At the same time, with the approach of making countries indebted, including covering the European debt crisis, China paid attention to its approach to increasing the yuan’s position.

Four factors have helped China compete more seriously in the new arena of the world’s dominant currency: First, China’s economic growth, which is expected to surpass America’s gross domestic product in the future. However, a new competitor called India has also emerged in this field. But three other factors have increased the possibility of increasing China’s competitiveness in the international currency system.

The second factor is its growing trade with other countries. The ambitious plan of the new Silk Road is almost complete, and the long-term strategy of “Made in China 2025” has also helped to increase the demand for Chinese currency significantly during this expanding trade. Signing currency swap agreements with countries has also helped China to use the yuan in exchanges.

The third factor is the financial system, which, especially after the trade war between China and the United States in the mid-2010s, caused China to strengthen the international position of the yuan by removing the dollar from its stock market transactions. In addition, China opened its financial market to foreign investors and established institutions such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Geopolitics is the fourth factor; The withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan, the country’s extensive sanctions against other countries, and Trump’s aggressive approach, which is likely to be repeated, are the factors that gave China the opportunity to make its role stronger, although with the same approach of economic diplomacy. The reproaching between Iran and Saudi Arabia in China is an example of this capacity building that China needs to develop its silk road project and other enormous economic and commercial projects.

Nevertheless, the dollar remains the dominant global currency and cannot be expected to lose its dominant position. The volume of trade between China and America is one-tenth compared to the volume of trade between China and the world, and this relationship means that the competition has not yet entered a decisive stage. China’s strategic profile shows that it changes its strategies based on conditions, and the country’s aggressive currency approach has started after the approach of pegging the value of the yuan to the dollar. Therefore, its continuation also depends on the continuation of the economic-commercial-technological competition of the two countries.

On the other hand, the US followed the program to reduce the reference interest rate to cut inflation. In addition, in the main approach of the US, the US Treasury bankrolls financial expenses through the issuance of domestic and foreign bonds; Assets that increase the national debt of the US and, according to the constitution of this country, have a specific ceiling. Currently, Janet Yellen, the US Treasury Secretary, believes that the country’s inability to prevent the increase of these debts will endanger its position as the leader of the international economy and strengthen the possibility of entering a global recession. Although Republicans have taken an opposing stance, the deflationary rule has been effectively abandoned in the debt ceiling negotiations.

The conditions above mean that the future of the competition between the two currencies depends both on China’s ability to continue the “Made in China 2025” strategy and on the US approach to inflation and the country’s national debt issue. Although a country’s national debt does not indicate its weakness and reflects the international credibility of a government, its effect on weakening the value of the national currency can be challenging. But the US is still the world leader in terms of technology. At the same time, you should also pay attention to cryptocurrencies and their development. Just as globalization did not proceed according to probable trends, the competition between China and the United States may mean something other than entering into a new world order, and relying solely on one of the two sides of the competition will be an irrational gamble.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Messages and Consequences of Student Protests in the United States

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Student protests in America take on new dimensions every day.
Because the university enjoys higher public trust and social capital than other civil and social institutions and is, therefore, more effective, the current protests put the U.S. government in a “difficult situation” that is clear in the statements of current and former U.S. officials.
Hamid Khoshayand – International Affairs Expert

An Analysis of New EU Sanctions Package Against Russia

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Caucasus issues said that Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström recently announced that EU states plan to include the ban on the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the sanctions against Russia.

An Analysis on Efforts by the US and China to Strengthen Mutual Military Capabilities

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on strategic issues said: The US Navy has put a project on the agenda to convert surplus oil platforms into mobile missile defense bases in the Pacific Ocean and face China’s threats. These platforms are supposed to be deployed in response to China’s growing missile threats in the Pacific region. Platforms converted into missile defense bases are expected to play an important role in increasing US air defense capabilities and assisting in the country’s strike missions.

Dimensions and Consequences of Erdoğan’s Visit to Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Note: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s recent trip to Iraq, after his last visit to Baghdad 13 years ago, is considered one of the most important political, economic, and security developments in the relations between the two countries.
Hamid Khoshayand- an expert on regional issues

Loading