Greece-Libya-Turkey Tension Continues in Eastern Mediterranean Economic Zone

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: At the end of November, Greece expanded the area of activity of the vessel chartered by ExxonMobil and Hellenic Energy (former Hellenic Petroleum) to the south of the island of Crete by publishing a new instruction. This action was carried out following the pressure of the consortium on the Greek Ministry of Energy. The consortium claims that there is a possibility of discovering gas resources in that area. It is expected that through this measure, Athens intends to push the Libyan government to negotiate to delimit the maritime areas between the two countries or direct it to the option of referring it to the International Court of Justice. Mahmoud Fazeli – Analyst of international affairs

According to the Greek side, this will effectively cancel the agreement signed between Turkey and Libya regarding the delimitation of the maritime zones between the two countries. Of course, it will be possible to do it only after holding elections and forming a government in Libya. Due to Turkey’s influence in Tripoli, any negotiation with Tripoli’s transitional government is impossible, and basically the current Libyan government lacks the necessary competence and authority to sign binding agreements.

Libya, on the other hand, has expressed dissatisfaction with Greece’s exploration activities in the field of hydrocarbons in the south and southwest of Crete and accuses that country of abusing Libya’s internal crisis. Libya claims that Greece is trying to take advantage of the Libyan crisis and, by concluding contracts for hydrocarbon research in the southwest of Crete, inside the disputed areas, put Libya in front of the demarcation of maritime areas between the two countries. Following the confirmation of the information regarding the start of exploration activities of the Sanco Swift ship on behalf of foreign companies that have signed contracts with Greece, Libya emphasizes that by using all possible legal and diplomatic tools with all its might, it will continue to defend its maritime borders and sovereign rights in the maritime areas of the country.

But in response to Libya’s positions, Greece declared that ‘unlike those who conclude illegal and ineffective ‘memorandums’ that ignore and violate the basic rules of international law and the international law of the sea, Greece applies its sovereign rights with full respect for international law and the law of the seas. This is what has been done in delimiting the exclusive economic zone with Egypt and Italy. Athens has declared that the duty of the transitional government of Libya is to immediately lead that country towards elections, and that they will work within the framework of the rules of the international law of the seas, with an elected government in Libya that has the necessary legitimacy and authority to conclude valid international agreements. Agreements in line with the roadmap set by the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (LPDF) in 2020.

While there is no sign of a reduction in the tension between Turkey and Greece, Athens has not been able to tolerate the cooperation agreement for the extraction of offshore hydrocarbon between Turkey and Libya and has sent a letter to the United Nations claiming that the agreement between Turkey and Libya violates the rights and sovereignty of Greece in the Mediterranean Sea. Athens warns that any attempt to implement the memorandum of understanding for hydrocarbon exploration activities signed between Turkey and Libya, which violates Greece’s sovereign rights, will lead to tension and instability in the region. Greece considers this memorandum of understanding as invalid as the 2019 agreement and asks Libya and Turkey to refrain from any measure that actually violates Greece’s rights regarding the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone. From the point of view of Athens, the Libyan government does not have the authority to sign contracts that cause problems in the relations of this country with other countries and are binding for it, and signing of the memorandum of understanding between Turkey and Libya is such a contract.

On the other hand, Turkey and Libya sent a joint letter to the United Nations regarding the memorandum of understanding signed between the two parties, advising Greece to end its aggressive rhetoric and intensify its measures and respect the sovereign decisions of the two neighboring countries. The government of national unity of Libya has the necessary powers to conclude international agreements and sign agreements with other countries, and it is Greece that deliberately ignores the signing of various agreements between EU member states and the Libyan government in the field of energy, infrastructure and economic activities.

On the other hand, on behalf of Ankara, the drilling ship “Abdul Hamid Khan” has started new drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean region. This ship is supposed to move towards the exclusive economic zone of Libya, where seismic activity has been carried out in the past. Egypt and Greece have been seeking greater coordination in countering Ankara’s policies since Turkey signed an initial gas and maritime deal with the Tripoli-based government in October. Both countries accuse Ankara of abusing the agreement to expand its influence in the Mediterranean Sea.

Tensions between Athens and Ankara have risen since 2019, when Turkey signed an agreement with Libya’s Tripoli-based government granting Turkey access to a disputed economic zone in the Eastern Mediterranean.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Reasons Why the Netanyahu Govt Is Preventing a Ceasefire Agreement

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The last round of indirect negotiations between Hamas officials and the Zionist regime, which was conducted in Cairo with the mediation of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States, was unsuccessful due to the Zionists’ “Obstruction.”
Hamid Khoshayand, an expert on regional issues

Claims of a US Arms Embargo against Zionist Regime Reveal America’s Deception

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that the US claims to have suspended sending weapons to the Zionist regime is a political deception to silence public opinion because this would make no difference in the nature of Washington’s support for the Zionist army and the existence of this regime.

Goals of Blinken’s Recent Trip to Saudi Arabia

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A researcher of Saudi affairs said that US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Riyadh recently during a regional trip and had consultations with the Riyadh officials. It seems that one of the items on the agenda between Saudi Arabia and America, in addition to the Gaza war, is the process of normalizing relations between the Israeli regime and the Arab kingdom.

Dr. Kharrazi's response to the new US position on Iran's nuclear program:
It Was America That Abandoned Nuclear Diplomacy/ Iran Also Considers Diplomacy the Best Approach

Strategic Council Online: The President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations stated: “The US State Department spokesperson, after my interview with Al Jazeera, reiterated their past remarks, stating that they won’t allow Iran to build nuclear weapons, but ultimately said diplomacy is the best approach. Yes, we too prefer diplomacy since based on the Fatwa of our Supreme Leader are not for nuclear weapons; rather, we are advocates of diplomacy to make the Middle East a nuclear-free region. But, in case the Israeli regime threatens us with nuclear weapons, we surely cannot sit idle and wait for permission from others.”

Europe’s Confusion in Securing Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Red Sea

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The strategic Strait of Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea have recently faced serious problems and crises due to the Gaza war. This is because of the protectionist approach of the Yemeni army forces toward Palestine, which, since the beginning of the Israeli regime’s attacks on the Gaza Strip, has included attacks on ships bound for or from the origin of the regime in the Red Sea.
They said they will continue their attacks until the Israeli regime’s military aggression in the Gaza Strip ends. The United States, as the most important supporter of the Israeli regime, was the first country to respond to this policy of Yemeni army forces and tried to form a global coalition to counter these attacks under the cover of supporting freedom of navigation, which, of course, failed because of conflicts of interests of Western countries and ended in the actions of the US and British attacks on positions in Yemen. Of course, although European countries were not seriously involved in the American coalition, they have numerous and complex interests in this inflammatory, and as a result, have adopted a particular and independent approach.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University Professor

The prospect of Possible Departure of Hamas Political Office from Qatar

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said Qatari authorities will definitely resist Western pressure to expel Hamas leaders from their territory, and probably the United States will not move towards a zero-hundred equation in this regard because if the Hamas leaders remain in Qatar, which is an ally of the United States, is better than moving to a country outside the power of the United States to exert pressure.

Loading